ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2578

Effect of Omega-3 Fatty Acids on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Ali Duarte Garcia1, Elena Myasoedova 1, Paras Karmacharya 1, Cynthia Crowson 2 and Kenneth Warrington 3, 1Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 2Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, 3Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Lupus and complimentary and alternative therapy

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 12, 2019

Title: SLE – Clinical Poster III: Treatment

Session Type: Poster Session (Tuesday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Omega-3 fatty acids may have anti-inflammatory properties. In animal models of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) Omega-3 fatty acids decrease autoantibody levels, reduce inflammatory markers and prolong the lifespan of lupus-prone mice. However clinical studies in patients with SLE have been small, with wide confidence intervals and conflicting findings. Thus, we aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine a more accurate and precise estimate effect of omega-3 fatty acids on SLE disease activity in adults.

Methods: Following an a priori established protocol, a comprehensive search in any language of several databases designed by two expert librarians was conducted from database’s inception to January 11th, 2019. Studies that were randomized controlled trials (RCT) of adults with SLE comparing omega 3 fatty acids supplementation to placebo or standard of care and reported SLE disease activity were included. Abstracts and full text reviews were evaluated independently and in duplicate by two investigators.

To combine outcomes, we standardized the disease activity scales (SLEDAI and SLAM) into standardized mean differences (SMD). Since small sample sizes can lead to biased overestimation of the SMD, we used Hedges’ (adjusted) g methods. For continuous outcomes we calculated the SMD and 95% confidence interval (95CI), we used the inverse variance approach random-effects model. Dichotomous outcomes were reported as odds ratio (OR) and 95CI. Heterogeneity was calculated with the I2 statistic. Results were presented in standardized mean response for SLE disease activity and 95CI. To improve clinical interpretability, the pooled data was scaled back to the SLEDAI by multiplying SMD by standard deviation of the studies that utilized SLEDAI.

Results: Six studies were included in the meta-analysis. The studies were published between 1990 and 2015. All the included studies were RCTs. The treatment group sizes ranged from 8-43 patients (median 20). In total 180 patients were in the comparison groups and 183 in the treatment groups. Half of the studies utilized the usual dose 3 grams or less of Omega 3 fatty acids while the rest used up to 20 grams. The trial follow-up time ranged from 22 – 52 weeks. The mean age of the patients was 43.2 years and 80% or more were female.

Four RCTs with 225 participants had continuous outcomes, 2 used SLEDAI and 2 used SLAM to measure SLE disease activity. As shown in the figure, the SMD of the included trials ranged from -0.18 (95CI, -0.88, 0.52) to -0.58 (95CI, -1.12,-0.05). The pooled SMD was -0.4 (95CI, -0.67, -0.14). We transformed the SMD to units of the SLEDAI scale. Compared to placebo, Omega 3 fatty acids reduced disease activity by 1.4 (95CI, -2.9, -1) SLEDAI points. The statistical heterogeneity was low with an I2 of zero.  

Two RCTs with dichotomous variables were included in the analysis. 64 patients were part of these studies. The pooled odds ratio was 0.29 (95CI, 0.04, 2.31). The statistical heterogeneity was high with an I2 of 72%.  

Conclusion: This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of Omega-3 fatty acids for the treatment of SLE. Our results suggest that Omega-3 fatty acids are a potential therapy that can be added to the immunosuppressive treatments used for SLE.

Forest plot of the effects of Omega 3 fatty acids vs. placebo in trials. Upper panel continuous outcomes. Lower panel dichotomous outcomes.


Disclosure: A. Duarte Garcia, None; E. Myasoedova, Pfizer, 2; P. Karmacharya, None; C. Crowson, Crescendo Bioscience, 5, Crescendo BioScience Inc., 5, Crescendo Bioscience Inc., 5, Crescendo Biosciences inc., 5, Pfizer, 2; K. Warrington, Eli Lilly, 2, GlaxoSmithKline, 2, roche, 2, 8, Roche, 2, 5, 8, Sanofi, 5, sanofi, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Duarte Garcia A, Myasoedova E, Karmacharya P, Crowson C, Warrington K. Effect of Omega-3 Fatty Acids on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/effect-of-omega-3-fatty-acids-on-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-disease-activity-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/effect-of-omega-3-fatty-acids-on-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-disease-activity-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology