ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2123

Clinical Features of Prosthetic Joint Infections in Patients with Rheumatic Diseases vs Osteoarthritis

Susan Goodman1, Milan Kapadia 2, Andy Miller 2, Laura Donlin 3, Michael Henry 2, Linda Russell 2, Mark Figgie 4, Allina Nocon 2 and Peter Sculco 2, 1Hospital For Special Surgery/Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, 2Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, 3Hospital For Special Surgery, New York, NY, 4Hospital for Special Surgery/Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, New York, NY

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Autoinflammatory Disease and total joint replacement, prosthetic joint infection

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 12, 2019

Title: Infection-Related Rheumatic Disease Poster

Session Type: Poster Session (Tuesday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Rheumatic disease (RD) patients are at increased risk for prosthetic joint infections (PJI), however, diagnosis is challenging because active RD may mimic joint infection and definitive microbiologic diagnosis may be delayed. We aimed to identify the clinical and microbiological features of total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) PJI in RD and OA patients, using an institutional PJI registry and compare the incidence of culture negative (CN) PJI in RD vs OA. Baseline clinical differences between CN-RD and culture positive (CP)-RD and OA PJI as well as the relationship of infection free survivorship of the prosthesis were also evaluated.

Methods: A retrospective cohort of THA/TKA PJIs, from 2009 to 2016, were identified by ICD codes, and confirmed by chart review. RD cases were also confirmed by use of RD-specific medications. CN cases were defined as PJIs with no evidence of microbial growth in intraoperative cultures and CP PJI cases were defined by positive microbial growth in intraoperative cultures. Treatment failure was defined as subsequent surgical treatment for infection after the index procedure- debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR), one stage or two stage exchange. Demographics, medications, microbiology, surgical therapy and outcome were abstracted. Baseline characteristics were evaluated using Fisher’s exact and Chi-Square tests.Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to calculate infection free survivorship.

Results: 807 PJI cases were identified including 36 RD (33 RAand 3 SLE) and 771 OA. A higher proportion of RD PJI were CN (N=10, 27%) vs. OA PJI (N=109, 14%, p=0.02). Fewer CN-RD cases met PJI histopathology criteria compared to CN-OA, (p=0.08). On average, RD-CN were younger than OA-CN (59 vs 69, p=.01), but no different than RD-CP cases. One year survivorship of CN-OA and CN-RD were 87% and 66%, respectively and 47% for CP-RD. Comparing CN-RD vs. CP-RD, no difference was observed in age, smoking, diabetes, or Charlson comorbidities, but a trend towards higher prevalence of prior PJI in the CN-RD group. No differences were found in surgical treatment (p=0.92) or use of biologics and DMARDs (p=0.12) between CN and CP RD patients.  Among CP cases, there was no difference in diabetes, comorbidities, smoking, or history of PJI, but more RD were female (p=.0003) and used glucocorticoids (p=.0001). Across all CP cases, 57.4% were Staphylococcal, with no differences between groups.  Overall surgical treatment included 2-stage exchange (54.8%), DAIR (39.24%) and 1-stage exchange (4.51%), with no differencebetween groups (p=0.76). Treatment failure was more frequent for CP-RD (30.4% vs 42.3%), but the difference was not significant (p=0.19).

Conclusion: RD PJIs are more likely to be culture negative than OA PJIs, but small numbers limit our analysis. Prior PJI, histopathology and better outcomes suggest biologic differences between CN and CP PJI that should be explored further.


Table 1

Table 1. Baseline Characteristics


Figure 1 The Kaplan


Disclosure: S. Goodman, BMC Rheumatology, 5, 6, Calgene, 5, Celgene, 5, Current Rheumatology reports, 5, Current Rheumatology Reports, 6, Horizon, 2, 5, horizon, 2, Novartis, 2, 5, NYU College of Medicine, 3, NYU Langone College of Medicine, 3, Pfizer, 2, 5, Regenosine, 4, 9, Roche, 2, UCB, 5; M. Kapadia, None; A. Miller, None; L. Donlin, Karius Inc, 9, Karius, Inc, 2, Stryker, 5; M. Henry, None; L. Russell, Arthritis Foundation, 6; M. Figgie, Insight, 4, Lima, 7, Mekanika, 4, Wishbone, 4, 5, 7; A. Nocon, None; P. Sculco, EOS Imaging, 5, Intellijoint, 5, Intellijoint Surgical, 2, Lima Corporate, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Goodman S, Kapadia M, Miller A, Donlin L, Henry M, Russell L, Figgie M, Nocon A, Sculco P. Clinical Features of Prosthetic Joint Infections in Patients with Rheumatic Diseases vs Osteoarthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/clinical-features-of-prosthetic-joint-infections-in-patients-with-rheumatic-diseases-vs-osteoarthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/clinical-features-of-prosthetic-joint-infections-in-patients-with-rheumatic-diseases-vs-osteoarthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology