ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 197

Discordance Of Patient-Physician Assessments Of General Health In a US Hispanic Population With Rheumatoid Arthritis

Leyda Díaz-Correa1, Mariely Nieves-Plaza2, Yesenia C. Santiago-Casas3, Tania González-Rivera4, Grissel Ríos3 and Luis M. Vilá3, 1Department of Medicine, University of Puerto Rico Medical Sciences Campus, San Juan, PR, 2University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 3Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Puerto Rico Medical Sciences Campus, San Juan, PR, 4Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Disease Activity, Health Assessment Questionnaire, Hispanic patients and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Health Services Research, Quality Measures and Quality of Care-Rheumatoid Arthritis

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Instruments to measure rheumatoid arthritis (RA) activity such as the 28-Joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) are used to assess response to treatment. One component of the DAS28 is the patient global assessment of general health. This is a subjective measurement that has been shown to be influenced by multiple factors such as depression. Moreover, some studies have reported discordance between patient and physician ratings of general health; however, the factors associated with these discrepancies have not been well established. The aims of this study were to determine the level of discordance of patient-physician assessments of general health in a group of US Hispanics with RA, and to evaluate the factors associated with such discordance.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in 213 US Hispanics with RA (per 1987 ACR criteria) participating in an observational study. Demographic parameters, clinical manifestations, disease activity (per DAS28), comorbid conditions, functional status (per Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]), pharmacologic profile, and patient and physician global assessments (measured on a visual analogue scale [VAS]) were determined. Positive discordance of general health was defined as a patient rating minus physician rating >25 mm on a 100-mm VAS. Differences between study groups were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression analysis. All variables with a p≤0.10 in the bivariable analysis plus age, gender and disease duration were entered into the regression model.

Results: The mean (standard deviation [SD]) age of RA patients was 56.6 (13.6) years; 88.0% were females. The mean (SD) disease duration was 11.2 (10.0) years. Positive patient-physician discordance was found in 78 (36.6%) patients. Only 2 patients exhibited negative discordance. In the multivariable analysis, patients with positive discordance were more likely to have a higher global assessment of pain (OR=1.05, 95% CI 1.03-1.07, p<0.001) and HAQ scores (OR=3.19, 95% CI 1.70-6.00, p<0.001), and were more likely to receive therapy with biologic agents (OR=3.06, 95% CI 1.40-6.71, p=0.005) than those without discordance. Conversely, patients with positive discordance had lower physician’s assessment of function (OR=0.96, 95% CI 0.93-0.98, p=0.002). No association was found for comorbidities including depression and fibromyalgia syndrome.

Conclusion: In this group of patients with RA, a large number differed from their physicians in the assessment of general health. Positive discordance was associated with patients’ self-report of pain and disability, and the use of biologics. The awareness of these factors may help to better assess disease activity and treatment response in this population.


Disclosure:

L. Díaz-Correa,
None;

M. Nieves-Plaza,
None;

Y. C. Santiago-Casas,
None;

T. González-Rivera,
None;

G. Ríos,
None;

L. M. Vilá,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/discordance-of-patient-physician-assessments-of-general-health-in-a-us-hispanic-population-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology