ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1350

Patient Disease Trajectories in Baricitinib-2 Mg-Treated Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Inadequate Response to Biologic DMARDs

Mark Genovese1, Michael Weinblatt 2, Jianmin Wu 3, Bochao Jia 3, Amanda Quebe 3, Luna Sun 3, Yun-Fei Chen 3, Cameron Helt 3, A. Kirstin Bacani 3, Paulo Reis 3 and Janet Pope 4, 1Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 2Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 3Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, 4Western University, London, ON, Canada

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and Janus kinase (JAK)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 11, 2019

Title: RA – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster II: Treatments, Outcomes, & Measures

Session Type: Poster Session (Monday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Baricitinib (BARI), a selective Janus kinase 1 and 2 inhibitor, is approved for the treatment of moderately-to-severely active RA in over 60 countries. In the RA-BEACON1 phase 3 trial, BARI 2-mg demonstrated clinical efficacy in patients (pts) with RA and an inadequate response to biologic DMARDs. The objectives of this analysis were to assess the response patterns to BARI 2-mg in the RA-BEACON trial and to describe the demographic and clinical characteristics for pts within each response pattern.

Methods: Observed data from all BARI 2-mg treated pts in the RA-BEACON trial (N=174) up to 24 weeks, protocol mandated rescue, treatment discontinuation, or loss to follow-up were included in the analysis. A Growth Mixture Model was used to classify the longitudinal disease patterns based on the time course of Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) improvement from week 0 to week 24. Baseline characteristics and disease measures were described between groups. The trajectories of HAQ-Disability Index (DI), pain, tender joint count (TJC), and swollen joint count (SJC) within each response pattern were also examined.

Results: BARI 2-mg treated pts were classified into 3 groups based on their CDAI trajectory patterns (Figure). Group 1 (n=90, 52%) had lower baseline CDAI (mean=34), achieved 53% improvement in group mean of CDAI at week 4 (change from baseline, ΔCDAI -18), 64% improvement at week 12 (ΔCDAI -22), and maintained similar improvement through 24 weeks. Group 2 (n=29, 17%) had higher baseline CDAI (mean=51), achieved 32% improvement in mean CDAI at week 4 (ΔCDAI -16) with greater improvement at week 12 (52%, ΔCDAI -27) and week 24 (66%, ΔCDAI -34). Group 3 (n=55, 32%) had a baseline CDAI (mean=52) similar to group 2, but had smaller improvement, achieving 18% improvement in CDAI (ΔCDAI -10) at week 24. The distributions of HAQ-DI, pain, TJC, and SJC within each response pattern showed a trajectory similar to the corresponding group CDAI trajectory. Baseline characteristics for these 3 groups are presented in Table 1. Compared to groups 1 and 2, group 3 had more pain, worse physical function (HAQ-DI), and a larger proportion of pts who used ≥3 bDMARDs at baseline.

Conclusion: There are three response patterns to BARI 2-mg treatment in the RA-BEACON trial. The majority of BARI 2-mg treated pts achieved good response (groups 1 and 2, 68%) with at least 50% improvement in CDAI by week 12. Response was observed as early as week 4 and was maintained or continued to improve in these groups through week 24. Pts with less response (group 3) tended to be more treatment experienced with more pain and worse physical function at baseline.

Reference: 1. Genovese MC et al. N Engl J Med 2016,374(13):1243-52; NCT01721044


Disclosure: M. Genovese, AbbVie, 2, 5, Abbvie, 2, 5, AbbVie, Inc., 9, Astellas, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, Eli Lilly and Company, 2, 5, EMD Merck Serono, 2, 5, Galapagos, 2, 5, Galapagos NV, 2, 5, 9, Genentech/Roche, 2, 5, Gilead, 2, 5, Gilead Science, 9, Gilead Sciences, Inc., 2, 5, 9, GSK, 5, Lilly, 2, 5, 9, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, 9, Pfizer Inc, 2, 5, Pfizer, Inc., 9, Pzier, 9, RPharm, 5, Sanofi Genzyme, 2, 5, Vertex, 2, 5; M. Weinblatt, Abbvie, 5, AbbVie, 5, Amgen, 5, BMS, 2, 5, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, Canfite, 1, 4, Corrona, 5, Crescendo Bioscience, 2, 5, Eli Lilly and Company, 5, Gilead, 5, Glaxo-Smith Kline, 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 5, GSK, 5, Horizon, 5, Lilly, 5, Lily, 5, Lycera, 1, 4, 5, Merck, 5, Novartis, 5, Pfizer, 5, Roche, 5, Samsung, 5, Samsung Bioepis Co., Ltd., 5, Sanofi Regeneron, 2, Sanofi/Regeneron, 2, Sanofi-Regeneron, 2, Scipher, 1, 4, 5, Set Point, 5, SetPoint, 5, Squibb, 5, Vorso, 1; J. Wu, Eli Lilly and Company, 1, 3; B. Jia, Eli Lilly and Company, 1, 3; A. Quebe, Eli Lilly & Company, 3, 4, Eli Lilly and Company, 1, 3; L. Sun, Eli Lilly and Company, 1, 3; Y. Chen, Eli Lilly and Company, 1, 3; C. Helt, Eli Lilly, 1, 3, Eli Lilly and Company, 1, 3; A. Bacani, Eli Lilly and Company, 1, 3; P. Reis, Eli Lilly and Company, 1, 3; J. Pope, AbbVie, 5, Abbvie, 5, Actelion, 5, Actellion, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, AstraZeneca, 2, Astra-Zeneca, 2, Bayer, 2, 5, BMS, 2, 5, Eicos Sciences, 5, Eli Lilly & Company, 5, Eli Lilly and Company, 5, EMERALD, 5, Emerald, 5, Genzyme, 5, Janssen, 5, Lilly, 5, Merck, 2, 5, Novartis, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, Roche, 2, 5, Sandoz, 5, Sanofi, 5, Seattle Genetics, 2, UCB, 2, 5, 8.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Genovese M, Weinblatt M, Wu J, Jia B, Quebe A, Sun L, Chen Y, Helt C, Bacani A, Reis P, Pope J. Patient Disease Trajectories in Baricitinib-2 Mg-Treated Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Inadequate Response to Biologic DMARDs [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patient-disease-trajectories-in-baricitinib-2-mg-treated-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-and-inadequate-response-to-biologic-dmards/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patient-disease-trajectories-in-baricitinib-2-mg-treated-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-and-inadequate-response-to-biologic-dmards/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology