ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1188

Novel PET-Coronary Flow Reserve Imaging to Assess for Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Compared to Subjects with Diabetes Mellitus and Controls

Cameron Speyer1, Corine Sinnette 1, Emma Stevens 1, Hongshu Guan 2, Courtney Bibbo 2, Marcelo Di Carli 2, Karen Costenbader 1 and Elena Massarotti 2, 1Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 2Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: positron emission tomography (PET) and cardiovascular disease, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 11, 2019

Title: Imaging Of Rheumatic Diseases Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session (Monday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: High risk of premature cardiovascular disease (CVD) among SLE patients is well documented, but the best means to detect the earliest stages of CVD in SLE are not known. Coronary microvascular dysfunction is thought to be one of the earliest detectable abnormalities and can be detected by measuring coronary flow reserve (CFR) with positron emission tomography (PET) scanning. PET-CFR is an emerging prognostic imaging technique used to detect increased CVD risk including death in non-SLE populations, even among those without overt obstructive coronary artery disease. We aimed to measure coronary microvascular function by CFR in active SLE patients and to compare findings to those of patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and non-SLE, non-DM controls.

Methods: We identified SLE patients with active disease (SLE disease activity index > 6), internal organ involvement and no history of known coronary artery disease, followed at the Brigham and Women’s Hospital Lupus Center. Pre-menopausal women and similar aged female controls without SLE or DM were enrolled as comparisons. Demographic and clinical data were collected. All subjects underwent rest and then stress myocardial perfusion PET scans, from which we measured regional and global left ventricular myocardial blood flow (in mL/min/g of tissue) and calculated the CFR as the ratio of myocardial blood flow during stress to that at rest. We used t-tests and Chi-squared tests to compare subject demographic characteristics, and ANOVA tests to compare mean global myocardial blood flow and CFR values between SLE, DM and control subjects.

Results: We studied 8 SLE, 12 DM and 6 control female subjects, all with normal PET scans indicating no evidence of obstructive CAD. Demographics are shown in Table 1. All SLE subjects were anti-dsDNA positive, 5/8 had lupus nephritis, and their mean SLEDAI score was 10 (SD 4.5) (Table 1). Rest myocardial blood flow was comparable across the three groups. Adenosine-stimulated myocardial blood flow was similar in SLE and pre-menopausal diabetic women (2.64 ± 0.52), but 21% lower in SLE patients than in controls (2.44 ± 0.28 vs. 3.09 ± 0.32 mL/min/g, p< 0.05) (Table 2). Although SLE patients were younger than the pre-menopausal DM women, they showed similar reduction in global CFR (Figure 1). Compared to controls, subjects with active SLE had a 22% reduction in global CFR (2.84 ± 0.41 vs 3.63 ± 0.96, p< 0.05).

Conclusion: Subjects with active SLE had a significant reduction in coronary microvascular function compared to non-diabetes, non-SLE controls. This reduction was similar to that observed in slightly older premenopausal women with diabetes mellitus. These preliminary findings suggest that coronary microvascular dysfunction, likely driven by inflammation in active SLE, may be an early marker of CVD risk among SLE patients, as it is in DM patients. Although studies are needed, PET-CFR may prove to be a useful tool for stratifying SLE patients in terms of their risks of CVD events and death.

We thank the John J. Holland and Virginia M. Bruen Fund for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research for supporting this study.


Table 1


Table 2


Figure 1


Disclosure: C. Speyer, None; C. Sinnette, None; E. Stevens, None; H. Guan, None; C. Bibbo, None; M. Di Carli, SpectrumDynamics, 2, Gilead Sciences, 2, GE Healthcare, 8; K. Costenbader, Astra-Zeneca, 2, Glaxo Smith Kline, 2, Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, 2, Lupus Foundation of America, 2, Lupus Research Alliance, 2, Merck, 2; E. Massarotti, Exagen, 2, 5, Sanofi, 2, BMS, 2, UCB, 5, EMD Serono (DSMB), 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Speyer C, Sinnette C, Stevens E, Guan H, Bibbo C, Di Carli M, Costenbader K, Massarotti E. Novel PET-Coronary Flow Reserve Imaging to Assess for Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Compared to Subjects with Diabetes Mellitus and Controls [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/novel-pet-coronary-flow-reserve-imaging-to-assess-for-coronary-microvascular-dysfunction-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-compared-to-subjects-with-diabetes-mellitus-and-controls/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/novel-pet-coronary-flow-reserve-imaging-to-assess-for-coronary-microvascular-dysfunction-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-compared-to-subjects-with-diabetes-mellitus-and-controls/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology