ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1038

Distinct Cell-bound Complement Activation Signatures Are Observed in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Rebecca Schriefer 1, Gabriel Arguelles 1, John Atkinson 1, Dennis Hourcade 1 and Alfred Kim1, 1Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: complement and biomarkers, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 11, 2019

Title: SLE – Etiology & Pathogenesis Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session (Monday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Cell-bound complement activation products (CB-CAPs) have previously been shown to associate with SLE disease activity, but only a small fraction of total CB-CAPs has been examined. Leveraging mass cytometry, we have developed and validated a panel capable of comprehensively characterizing the types and quantities of CB-CAPs and complement receptors on human PBMCs. In this pilot study, we sought to characterize the types and amounts of CB-CAPs observed in flaring and inactive SLE and identify SLE patient stratifications based on CB-CAPs signatures.

Methods: Six paired PBMC samples from flaring and remission consented patients with 1997 ACR or 2012 SLICC classified SLE were obtained from the Washington University Lupus Clinic. Mass-tag barcoded PBMCs were stained using a validated set of 30 antibodies to cell surface markers, various CB-CAPs, and complement receptors. Stained PBMCs were run on a Helios-upgraded CyTOF2 mass cytometer, and data analyzed in Cytobank (viSNE, FlowSOM).

Results: We found that in flaring subjects, B cells possessed the greatest load of CB-CAPs compared to T cell and macrophages. Most CB-CAPs markers were absent in the paired remission samples. Evidence of classical, alternative, and common pathway activation was observed on these SLE B cells and can be categorized into six broad metaclusters. Five of the metaclusters possessed both classical and alternative pathway activation markers but differed in how completely the common pathway was activated, including 25% of B cells that did not activate C5 at all despite C3 activation. The fifth metacluster possessed only alternative and common pathway activation markers. B cell subsets of virtually every type could be found in each metacluster, with the exception of plasma cells which were devoid of any complement activation markers.

Conclusion: These data represent the first attempt to stratify SLE patients based off of CB-CAP signatures. B cells from flaring subjects broadly possess CB-CAPs, and all B cell subsets with exception of plasma cells are subject to complement activation. Subjects in remission were essentially devoid of CB-CAPs. We observed six distinct CB-CAPs signatures, with differences in the extent of classical, alternative, and common pathway activation defining these signatures. Our data may have important implications for how CB-CAPs biomarkers are best used in the clinic and clinical trials. Additionally, identification of CAPS signatures may inform investigators about which complement targets are best suited for specific individuals.


Disclosure: R. Schriefer, None; G. Arguelles, None; J. Atkinson, Kypha, Inc., 5, Compliment Corporation, 5, Gemini Therapeutics, 5, Celidex Therapeutics, 5, Clinical Pharmacy Services, 5, CDMI, 5, Omeros Corporation, 5, Achillion Pharmaceuticals, 5, True North Therapeutics, 5, BioMarin Pharmaceutical, 5, Annexon Biosciences, 5, AdMiRx, 5; D. Hourcade, None; A. Kim, Exagen Diagnostics, Inc., 5, 8, Exagen Diagnotics, Inc., 5, 8, GlaxoSmithKline, 2, 5, 8, Kypha, Inc, 2, Kypha, Inc., 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Schriefer R, Arguelles G, Atkinson J, Hourcade D, Kim A. Distinct Cell-bound Complement Activation Signatures Are Observed in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/distinct-cell-bound-complement-activation-signatures-are-observed-in-patients-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/distinct-cell-bound-complement-activation-signatures-are-observed-in-patients-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology