ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 877

Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients’ Perspectives on Tapering of Biologics: A Qualitative Study

Jack Chan 1, Lisa Stamp2, Nicola Liebergreen 1, Henry Ndukwe 1, Carlo Marra 1 and Gareth Treharne 1, 1University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand, 2University of Otago, Christchurch, Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and Biologics

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 10, 2019

Title: 3S092: New Approaches to Old Diseases (875–879)

Session Type: ARP Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:30PM-4:00PM

Background/Purpose: Tapering of biologics is now recommended in the management of people with RA in sustained remission.1 Clinical studies have shown some RA patients can successfully taper their biologic without significant increases in disease activity or radiographic progression. However, little is known of RA patients’ perspectives about the possibility of tapering their biologic. This study sought to identify factors that may influence RA patients’ decision to taper their biologic.

Methods: Patients meeting the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for RA and currently taking biologics were eligible to participate in focus groups or individual interviews. Patients with any level of disease activity were included to allow exploration of a wide range of perspectives and to avoid exclusion of potentially valuable insights. All interviews and focus group discussions were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were coded using an established approach to thematic analysis2 to determine themes relating to patients’ decision about tapering biologics.

Results: 128 eligible patients were invited, 76 declined or did not respond and 7 were unavailable. 45 participants were involved in either 1 of 6 focus groups (n=43) or an in-depth individual interview (n=2). Around two-thirds of participants were receiving biologics via infusion and the remaining were self-injecting. Five themes were identified: fear of the uncertainty of outcomes, prioritizing quality of life over the risk of adverse effects, relief from medication burden, healthcare system support, and preference for involvement in decision-making. Participants had strong concerns that tapering their biologic might lead to periods of uncontrolled disease activity leading to joint damage. Their desire for better quality of life outweighed the concern of adverse effects associated with long-term biologic use. Nevertheless, participants recognized a lower frequency of administration would provide convenience in some aspects of daily life. Prompt reinitiation of biologics and consultation with the rheumatology team if flares occur when tapering are crucial from the perspective of the participants. Furthermore, participants would prefer to make the decision to taper biologics together with their rheumatologist.

Conclusion: Concerns of uncontrolled disease and receiving access to treatment when disease flares are among the key issues that need to be addressed when planning tapering protocols. Tool to aid shared decision making may facilitate the exchange of information, improve patients’ knowledge and understanding of the benefits and risks involved in tapering their biologic leading to greater acceptance of tapering.

Reference

  1. Smolen et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2016 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(6):960-977
  2. Braun et al. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006;3(1):77-101

Disclosure: J. Chan, None; L. Stamp, None; N. Liebergreen, None; H. Ndukwe, None; C. Marra, None; G. Treharne, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Chan J, Stamp L, Liebergreen N, Ndukwe H, Marra C, Treharne G. Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients’ Perspectives on Tapering of Biologics: A Qualitative Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-perspectives-on-tapering-of-biologics-a-qualitative-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-perspectives-on-tapering-of-biologics-a-qualitative-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology