ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 679

Longitudinal Changes in Manifestations of SLE

Amanda Eudy1, Jennifer Rogers 1, Raeann Whitney 1, Lisa Criscione-Schreiber 1, Jayanth Doss 1, David Pisetsky 2, Rebecca Sadun 1, Kai Sun 1 and Megan Clowse 1, 1Duke University, Durham, 2Duke University, Durham VAMC, Durham

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Disease Activity, Fatigue, patient-reported outcome measures and Type 1 and 2 SLE, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 10, 2019

Title: SLE – Clinical Poster I: Epidemiology & Pathogenesis

Session Type: Poster Session (Sunday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Our group has developed a conceptual model to categorize SLE manifestations into two dimensions termed Type 1 and Type 2. Type 1 SLE consists of active inflammatory manifestations like arthritis, nephritis, and rashes, and Type 2 SLE includes symptoms of fatigue, myalgia, mood disturbance, and cognitive dysfunction. SLE is characterized by waxing and waning of Type 1 inflammatory features considered to be disease activity. To advance lupus symptom characterization, we assessed whether Type 2 symptoms fluctuate over time.

Methods: SLE patients meeting SLICC criteria with ≥2 visits at a university rheumatology clinic between January 2018 and May 2019 were included. At each visit, SLEDAI was measured and patients completed the ACR FM Diagnostic Criteria. The FM severity score (FSS) is the sum of the widespread pain (0-19) and symptom severity scores (0-12). Patients were classified as having Type 1 SLE manifestations (SLEDAI ≥6, clinical SLEDAI ≥4, or active nephritis), Type 2 SLE symptoms (FSS >10), Mixed (both Type 1 and Type 2), or Minimal (neither Type 1 or Type 2). A clinically significant change in SLEDAI and FSS was defined as a +/- 2-point change between two visits for either of these measures. Changes in Type 1 and Type 2 severity between the two visits were estimated using simple statistics.

Results: 84 patients were included in the analysis (mean age 42 years, mean duration of SLE 14 years, 95% female, 65% African American, 56% with history of lupus nephritis). The average time between visits was 19 weeks (range: 4-34). At the first visit, 17% of patients were classified as Type 1, 12% as Type 2, 25% as Mixed, and 46% as Minimal. In patients with Minimal or Type 1 SLE at Visit 1, 8-14% experienced active Type 2 symptoms at Visit 2 (Figure 1). In comparison, for patients with Type 2 or Mixed SLE at Visit 1, approximately 40% were no longer classified as having active Type 2 symptoms at Visit 2.

Overall, 44% of patients had an improved FSS at Visit 2 and 30% had improvement in SLEDAI (Figure 2). Type 2 symptoms fluctuated in all patient groups between visits.  Type 2 SLE symptoms worsened in 21% of Minimal and 36% of Type 1 SLE patients.  Interestingly, patients with Mixed activity appeared to have a greater improvement in FSS (81%) compared to patients with only Type 2 SLE activity (50%).  When specific Type 2 symptoms were explored, 78% of patients who reported moderate or severe fatigue at Visit 1 continued to have moderate or severe fatigue at Visit 2, whereas only 16% of patients without fatigue at Visit 1 experienced fatigue at Visit 2. Fatigue was more prevalent and persistent in patients classified as Type 2 and Mixed at Visit 1. Improvements were seen in cognitive dysfunction, muscle weakness, and muscle pain, with approximately 40% of patients reporting improvement in symptoms at Visit 2.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that, similar to Type 1 features, Type 2 symptoms vary over time, with almost half of the patients in the analysis having an improvement in FSS between visits. Future studies are needed to determine Type 2 fluctuations over a longer follow-up period, as well as to identify treatment approaches to improve Type 2 symptoms.

Figure 1. Change in Type 1 and Type 2 SLE Classification Between Visits.
The bars represent the distribution of patient symptoms at Visit 2 for each Visit 1 classification group.

Figure 2. Change in Fibromyalgia Severity Score and SLEDAI between visits.


Disclosure: A. Eudy, GSK, 2; J. Rogers, None; R. Whitney, None; L. Criscione-Schreiber, None; J. Doss, None; D. Pisetsky, None; R. Sadun, None; K. Sun, None; M. Clowse, GSK, 2, UCB, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Eudy A, Rogers J, Whitney R, Criscione-Schreiber L, Doss J, Pisetsky D, Sadun R, Sun K, Clowse M. Longitudinal Changes in Manifestations of SLE [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/longitudinal-changes-in-manifestations-of-sle/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/longitudinal-changes-in-manifestations-of-sle/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology