ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 490

Validation of Risk Scores for Predicting Progression in Individuals “At Risk of Rheumatoid Arthritis”

Laurence Duquenne1, Jacqueline Nam 2, Kulveer Mankia 2, Andrea Di Matteo 2, Leticia Garcia-Montoya 2 and Paul Emery 2, 1Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, Leeds, England, United Kingdom, 2Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, Leeds, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: At-Risk of Inflammatory Arthritis, Doppler ultrasound and Shared Epitope, Risk score

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 10, 2019

Title: RA – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster I: Risk Factors, Predictors, & Prognosis

Session Type: Poster Session (Sunday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Risk scores for progression have been described in 2015 in a cohort of 100 anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) positive individuals at risk of developing Inflammatory Arthritis (IA) (Rakieh, 2015). The first score, designed for primary care, was based on anti-CCP and rheumatoid factor (RF) titres, small joints tenderness and early morning stiffness (EMS). A second score developed for secondary care added power Doppler presence (PD+) and/or at least one allele positive for the shared epitope (SE+).
The objective is to validate previous data by scoring risk factors in a new cohort of 318 individuals.

Methods: Individuals at risk of developing IA selected by a positive anti-CCP test and a new musculoskeletal symptom have been followed in a single-centre prospective observational cohort since 2008. Previous risks analysis were founded on the data collected among 100 patients, a sequential 318 patients’ data are analysed here with the same recruitment and follow-up pathways (Full data were available for 263 patients for secondary care).

Participants who had a negative anti-CCP test at first visit control and those followed for less than 6 weeks without progression were excluded.

Results: Participants from both cohorts were similar in terms of age and sex. Although the mean time to progression was comparable, there were significantly more participants with a high titre anti-CCP test in the 2015 cohort (Table 1). Cox multivariable analysis showed similar Hazard Ratios (HR) of progression for the two groups with a better predictive value of the CCP high titre in the 2019 group (Table 2.A). There was consequently a good correlation with progression rates in the highest scores (Table 2.B). The Kaplan-Meier curves in Figure 1 confirms survival rates according to level of risk in 2019. The secondary care score identified 10% more progressors at one year (HR 5.4 for High risk scores, p< 0.001).

Conclusion: These data from a new large cohort confirm the validity of previous Leeds Risk Scores for primary and secondary care and the fidelity of the risk factors over time to predict progression.

Table 1: Patients characteristics

Tabe 2

Figure 1: Probability of IA free survival over up to 75 Months of follow-up, according to categories of risk.


Disclosure: L. Duquenne, None; J. Nam, None; K. Mankia, None; A. Di Matteo, None; L. Garcia-Montoya, None; P. Emery, AbbVie, 2, 5, 9, BMS, 2, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, 9, Gilead, 5, Lilly, 2, 5, 9, MSD, 2, 5, 9, Novartis, 2, 5, 9, Pfizer, 2, 5, 9, Roche, 2, 5, 9, Samsung, 2, 5, 9, Samsung Bioepis Co., Ltd., 2, Sandoz, 2, 5, 9, UCB, 2, 5, 9.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Duquenne L, Nam J, Mankia K, Di Matteo A, Garcia-Montoya L, Emery P. Validation of Risk Scores for Predicting Progression in Individuals “At Risk of Rheumatoid Arthritis” [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/validation-of-risk-scores-for-predicting-progression-in-individuals-at-risk-of-rheumatoid-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/validation-of-risk-scores-for-predicting-progression-in-individuals-at-risk-of-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology