ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 144

Antiphospholipid Syndrome-Associated Preeclampsia Is Defined by a Distinct Clinical Phenotype

Shashank Cheemalavagu1, Beth Wallace 2, Wendy Marder 3, Jason Knight 4 and Andrew Vreede 5, 1Department of Internal Medicine, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, 2Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System; Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, 3Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, 4Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, 5Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Michigan Medicine; Rheumatology Section, VA Ann Arbor Health System, Ann Arbor, MI

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Antiphospholipid antibodies, antiphospholipid syndrome, complications and outcomes, pregnancy

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 10, 2019

Title: Antiphospholipid Syndrome Poster

Session Type: Poster Session (Sunday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) significantly increases risk of preeclampsia. It is assumed that APS is associated with a subset of severe preeclampsia, HELLP (Hemolysis; Elevated Liver enzymes; Low Platelet count) syndrome, and that APS-associated preeclampsia presents earlier and with increased severity compared to non-APS associated preeclampsia. However, little data exists that directly compares these groups of patients. Herein we compare clinical characteristics of patients with APS-associated preeclampsia to those of APS-negative preeclampsia patients.

Methods: We used the electronic medical record of a large academic medical system to identify adult APS patients with at least one preeclampsia episode between 2000-2018. APS diagnoses were confirmed using the updated Sapporo APS Classification, and preeclampsia diagnoses (including subsets of severe preeclampsia and HELLP) were classified according to American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines. We identified control patients from the same electronic medical record with at least one episode of preeclampsia and negative laboratory testing for antiphospholipid antibodies at the time of the preeclampsia event.  Groups were compared with respect to demographic factors, clinical presentation and fetal outcomes (including intrauterine growth restriction, intrauterine fetal demise and infant mortality within the first week of life) using Student’s t test and Chi-Square test.

Results: We identified eight APS patients and 29 controls with at least one episode of preeclampsia during the study period (Table 1). APS patients had a mean age of 30 years, 100% were white and BMI was 32 ± 2 (mean ± SD). Controls had similar demographics, with the exception that only 59% of controls were white. Of the eight APS patients, 38% had a pre-existing APS diagnosis (all based on obstetric complications; no thrombotic history), 38% were triple-positive (positive lupus anticoagulant, anti-cardiolipin and anti-β2 glycoprotein antibodies), 38% had at least one prior episode of preeclampsia and 50% had systemic lupus (likely low disease activity based on review of laboratory studies, lack of significant proteinuria, and treatment with few/no lupus medications). Although both groups had similar rates of severe preeclampsia, APS patients were more likely to have preeclampsia associated with at least partial HELLP (75%) compared to non-APS controls (20.7%) (p=0.004). Further, APS patients had more severe liver involvement (p=0.028) and thrombocytopenia (p=0.018). There was a trend for less severe proteinuria in APS-associated preeclampsia (p=0.36). No significant differences were seen in maternal or fetal outcomes, although there was a trend for more frequent intrauterine growth restriction complicating pregnancies of women with APS. Both groups developed preeclampsia at similar gestational ages.

Conclusion: As compared with preeclampsia in the general population, APS-associated preeclampsia has a distinct clinical phenotype, more often presenting in association with HELLP. If verified by other studies, these clinical differences suggest the possibility that distinct disease mechanisms underlie APS-associated preeclampsia.


Preeclampsia_APS_V5

Table 1: Comparison of preeclampsia patients with and without antiphospholipid syndrome


Disclosure: S. Cheemalavagu, None; B. Wallace, None; W. Marder, None; J. Knight, None; A. Vreede, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Cheemalavagu S, Wallace B, Marder W, Knight J, Vreede A. Antiphospholipid Syndrome-Associated Preeclampsia Is Defined by a Distinct Clinical Phenotype [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/antiphospholipid-syndrome-associated-preeclampsia-is-defined-by-a-distinct-clinical-phenotype/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/antiphospholipid-syndrome-associated-preeclampsia-is-defined-by-a-distinct-clinical-phenotype/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology