ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2817

Cardiovascular Disease Risk with Biologics and Tofacitinib Compared to Conventional Synthetic Dmards in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Gulsen Ozen1, Sofia Pedro2 and Kaleb Michaud1,2, 1Rheumatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 2FORWARD, The National Databank for Rheumatic Diseases, Wichita, KS

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Biologic drugs, Cardiovascular disease, Epidemiologic methods, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and tofacitinib

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2018

Title: 5T088 ACR Abstract: RA–DX, Manifestations, & Outcomes IV: CV Co-Morbidities (2814–2819)

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:30PM-4:00PM

Background/Purpose: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) represents the leading cause of death in RA, accounting for ~50% of excess mortality. Disease activity, strongly linked to CVD, has been significantly improved by biologic (b) and targeted-synthetic DMARDs in RA. However, the influence of these agents targeting different inflammatory pathways on the CVD risk in RA is not yet clear. We examined the comparative effects of bDMARDs and tofacitinib against conventional synthetic (cs) DMARDs on incident CVD in RA patients.

Methods: RA patients with ≥1 year participation in FORWARD, The National Databank for Rheumatic Diseases, from 1998 through 2017 were assessed for incident CVD (myocardial infarction, stroke and heart failure validated from hospital/death records). DMARDs were categorized into 7 mutually exclusive groups: (1) csDMARDs-referent (2) TNFi (3) Abatacept (4) Rituximab (5) Tocilizumab (6) Anakinra (7) Tofacitinib. For glucocorticoids (GC), a weighted cumulative exposure (WCE) model which combines information about duration, intensity, and timing of exposure into a summary measure was used. Event rates were calculated and compared across bDMARDs using Cox proportional hazards with adjustment for sociodemographics, comorbidities, and RA severity measures.  

Results: 1,561 CV events were identified in 17,363 RA patients (mean [SD] age 63[13] years, disease duration 18[13] years) during a median (IQR) 4.1 (1.8-8.2) years of followup. TNFi and nonTNFi bDMARDs users had significantly higher disease activity, disability, and comorbidity scores than csDMARD users. The incidence rate (95% CI) of CVD for the entire cohort was 1.78 (1.69-1.87) per 1,000 patient-years. Incidence rates in each DMARD group are shown in the Table. The adjusted model showed a significant CVD risk reduction with TNFi (HR 0.79 [0.69-0.92]) and abatacept (HR 0.53 [0.30-0.92]) compared to csDMARDs whereas GC as WCE was associated with significant risk increase (HR 1.15 [1.11-1.20]). Other bDMARDs and tofacitinib were not significant (Figure). In analysis of individual TNFi, although all TNFi tended to be associated with decreased CV risk, only the risk with infliximab (HR 0.81 [0.67-0.98]) and etanercept (HR 0.78 [0.64-.95]) reached statistical significance.

Conclusion: TNFi, notably infliximab and etanercept, and abatacept were associated with decreased risk of CVD and GC with increased risk. Despite reported similar efficacies of bDMARDs in RA, the difference in CV benefits may be due to drug-specific mechanisms directly influencing the atherosclerosis or metabolic changes.

 

 

Table. Crude incidence rates and risk of cardiovascular disease in rheumatoid arthritis by treatment

 

No. of events/exposure

Patient-years

Incidence rate

(95% CI)* 

Unadjusted HR (95% CI)

Adjusted HRƪ

(95% CI)

All patients

1,561/17,363

87,723

1.78 (1.69-1.87)

–

–

Glucocorticoids

646/8,914

29,930

2.16 (2.00-2.33)

1.18 (1.15-1.21)

1.15 (1.11-1.20)

DMARD Category

    csDMARDs (referent)

1,184/14,418

64,265

1.84 (1.74-1.95)

Referent

Referent

TNFi

340/7,178

20,260

1.68 (1.51-1.87)

0.57 (0.50-0.64)

0.79 (0.69-0.92)

    Abatacept   

15/1,048

18,913

0.79 (0.48-1.32)

0.21 (0.13-0.35)

0.53 (0.30-0.92)

Rituximab

11/509

5,467

2.01 (1.11-3.63)

0.47 (0.26-0.85)

0.78 (0.41-1.47)

Tocilizumab

6/390

4,411

1.36 (0.61-3.03)

0.31 (0.14-0.69)

1.00 (0.44-2.27)

Anakinra

4/137

1,419

2.82 (1.06-7.51)

1.08 (0.41-2.90)

0.87 (0.32-2.33)

Tofacitinib

1/275

1,769

0.57 (0.10-4.01)

0.10 (0.01-0.72)

0.33 (0.05-2.38)

*Per 1,000 patient-years

ƪAdjusted for age, sex, disease duration, socioeconomic status (employment and education level, insurance, location of residency), ethnicity, smoking, hypertension ,diabetes,  comorbidity index, BMI, HAQ, NSAIDs, statins, prior count of csDMARDs and bDMARDs, prior CVD history and year of entry

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Disclosure: G. Ozen, None; S. Pedro, None; K. Michaud, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Ozen G, Pedro S, Michaud K. Cardiovascular Disease Risk with Biologics and Tofacitinib Compared to Conventional Synthetic Dmards in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/cardiovascular-disease-risk-with-biologics-and-tofacitinib-compared-to-conventional-synthetic-dmards-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/cardiovascular-disease-risk-with-biologics-and-tofacitinib-compared-to-conventional-synthetic-dmards-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology