ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1818

Greater BMD Gains with Denosumab Vs Risedronate in Glucocorticoid-Treated Subjects: Results from the Final 24-Month Analysis of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Study

Kenneth Saag1, Nicola Pannacciulli2, Piet Geusens3, Jonathan D. Adachi4, Osvaldo D. Messina5, Jorge Morales-Torres6, Ronald Emkey7, Peter W. Butler2, Xiang Yin2 and Willem F. Lems8, 1University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 2Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, 3Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands, 4McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada, 5Cosme Argerich Hospital, Buenos Aries, Argentina, 6Hospital Aranda de la Parra, Leon, Mexico, 7Emkey Arthritis & Osteoporosis Clinic, Wyomissing, PA, 8VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Bisphosphonates, denosumab, glucocorticoids and osteoporosis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 22, 2018

Title: 4M042 ACR Abstract: Plenary Session II (1816–1821)

Session Type: ACR Plenary Session

Session Time: 11:00AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Denosumab 60 mg subcutaneously every 6 months (Q6M) increased spine and hip BMD significantly more than risedronate 5 mg orally once daily (QD) at 12 months in glucocorticoid-treated subjects (as previously reported1). This analysis compared the BMD effects of denosumab vs risedronate and further characterized denosumab safety in this population at 24 months.

Methods: This phase 3, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy study enrolled adults ≥18 years receiving ≥7.5 mg daily prednisone (or equivalent) for <3 months (glucocorticoid-initiating subpopulation) or ≥3 months (glucocorticoid-continuing subpopulation). All subjects <50 years had to have a history of osteoporotic fracture. Glucocorticoid-continuing subjects ≥50 years had to have a lumbar spine, total hip, or femoral neck BMD T-score ≤–2.0, or ≤–1.0 and a history of fracture. Subjects were randomized 1:1 to denosumab 60 mg subcutaneously Q6M or risedronate 5 mg orally QD for 24 months. This analysis assessed denosumab superiority over risedronate for percentage change from baseline in lumbar spine and total hip BMD at 24 months.

Results: Of 795 randomized subjects, 590 (74.2%) completed the 24-month study (glucocorticoid-initiating: 109/145 denosumab, 117/145 risedronate; glucocorticoid-continuing: 186/253 denosumab, 178/252 risedronate). Denosumab was superior to risedronate for increases from baseline in lumber spine and total hip BMD at all timepoints assessed through 24 months in each subpopulation (Figure). Adverse events, serious adverse events (including infection), and fractures were similar between groups.

Conclusion: Denosumab was superior to risedronate for increases in spine and hip BMD through 24 months. The overall safety profile was similar between groups. Denosumab may offer a valuable osteoporosis treatment option for patients receiving glucocorticoids.

Reference: 1. Saag KG, et al. Denosumab versus risedronate in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, double-dummy, non-inferiority study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018: DOI: 10.1016/S2213-8587(1018)30075-30075.


Disclosure: K. Saag, Amgen Inc., 2, 5,Merck & Co., 2, 5,Lilly, 5,Radius, 5; N. Pannacciulli, Amgen Inc., 1, 3; P. Geusens, Amgen Inc., 2, 5,Lilly, 2, 5,Abbott, 2,Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2,Celgene Corporation, 2,Janssen, 2,Merck & Co., 2,Novartis, 2,Pfizer, Inc., 2,Roche, 2,UCB, 2,Will Pharma, 2; J. D. Adachi, Amgen Inc., 2, 5, 8,McMaster University, 3; O. D. Messina, None; J. Morales-Torres, Amgen Inc., 5, 8; R. Emkey, Amgen Inc., 5, 8; P. W. Butler, Amgen Inc., 1, 3; X. Yin, Amgen Inc., 1, 3; W. F. Lems, Amgen Inc., 5, 8,Merck & Co., 5, 8,Eli Lilly, 5, 8.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Saag K, Pannacciulli N, Geusens P, Adachi JD, Messina OD, Morales-Torres J, Emkey R, Butler PW, Yin X, Lems WF. Greater BMD Gains with Denosumab Vs Risedronate in Glucocorticoid-Treated Subjects: Results from the Final 24-Month Analysis of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/greater-bmd-gains-with-denosumab-vs-risedronate-in-glucocorticoid-treated-subjects-results-from-the-final-24-month-analysis-of-a-randomized-double-blind-double-dummy-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/greater-bmd-gains-with-denosumab-vs-risedronate-in-glucocorticoid-treated-subjects-results-from-the-final-24-month-analysis-of-a-randomized-double-blind-double-dummy-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology