ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 639

Is a Primary Good Response to Nsaids Predictive of the Subsequent Response to the First TNF Inhibitor in Patients with Early Axial Spondyloarthritis ?

Loukianos Couvaras1, Daniel Wendling2, Vanessa Pauly3, Vincent Pradel4, Anna Molto5, Pierre Lafforgue1 and Thao Pham6, 1Rheumatology, Aix-Marseille University, APHM, Marseille, France, 2service de rhumatologie, CHU J Minjoz, Besancon, France, 3Public Health, Aix-Marseille university, AP-HM, Marseille, France, 4Public Health, APHM, Marseille, France, 5Hôpital Cochin, Department of Rheumatology, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France, 6Rheumatology Department, Aix-Marseille University, APHM, Marseille, France

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: anti-TNF therapy, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and spondylarthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 21, 2018

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Clinical Poster I: Imaging, Clinical Studies, and Treatment

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Good response to NSAIDs is a SpA feature included in classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Among patients eligible for a TNF inhibitor (TNFi), some patients may have never responded to NSAIDs (NSAIDs non-responders) while others primary responded before secondary failure (NSAIDs responders). Our aim was to determine if the primary NSAIDs response is an independent predictive factor of a subsequent good response to the first TNFi in patients with early axSpA.

Methods:

Patients: Subjects from the prospective observational DESIR cohort of early axSpA cohort who started a TNFi over the 5 years of follow-up.

NSAIDs response and TNFi response definitions: NSAIDs response was defined by the item “good response to NSAIDs according to Amor’s criteria” at the inclusion visit. TNFi response was defined by the BASDAI50 response between the “baseline” visit (last cohort visit before TNFi initiation) and the “follow-up” visit (visit taking place after at least 8 weeks of TNFi treatment).

Analysis
We compared the characteristics of the NSAIDs responder to the non-responders and their response to the first TNFi. We performed a multivariate logistic regression modeling the impact of an NSAID response to the TNFi response. We included known predictive factors of TNFi response in this model (age, gender, HLAB-B27, activity of the disease [ASDAS-CRP], CRP, X- ray and MRI sacroiliitis). To account for selection bias and for confirmation purpose, we applied a propensity score with Inverse Probability Weighting (IPW) method to predict TNFi response (SAS, version 9.2).

Results:

Among the 708 patients of the cohort, 236 were included in the analysis. At baseline, the main characteristics were the following: 106 (44.9%) males, mean age 33.9 ± 8.9 years, mean BASDAI 54.4 ± 17.3 and 202 (85.6%) were NSAIDs responders. The NSAIDs responder and non-responder groups were comparable at M0 except for HLA-B27 positive status: 59.9% vs 41.2%, p = 0,041, history of psoriasis: 17.8% vs 35.3%, p = 0.019 and BASDAI: 53.0 ± 18.1 vs 61.8 ± 13.2, p = 0,001, in responder and non-responder patients, respectively.
The percentage of TNFi responders was 32.2% (65/202) and 23.5% (8/34) in the NSAIDs responder and non-responder groups, respectively (univariate analysis (OR 1.5 [IC95%: 0.7-3.6], p = 0.313).
The multivariate logistic regression found the following independent factors of the TNFi response: gender [adjusted OR (aOR) = 2.9 [CI95%: 1.4–6.0], p=0.004], age [aOR = 0.9 [CI95%: 0.91-0.99], p=0.026], HLA-B27 status [aOR = 2.5 [CI95 %: 1.2–5.3], p = 0.02], ASDAS-CRP score [aOR=1.6 [CI95 %: 1.1–2.4], p = 0.016], and MRI sacroiliitis [aOR = 2.0 [CI95 %: 1.0–4.2], p = 0.054]. Response to NSAIDs was not significantly associated to the response to the TNFi [aOR = 1.93 [CI95 %: 0.6-6.3], p = 0.275]. The IPW aOR confirmed the non-association between NSAIDs good response and TNFi good response: 1.60 [CI95%: 0.7–3.3], p = 0.20.

Conclusion:

NSAIDs good response, according to the Amor’s criteria, does not seem to be an independent predictive factor of the subsequent TNFi response in early axSpA patients.


Disclosure: L. Couvaras, None; D. Wendling, None; V. Pauly, None; V. Pradel, None; A. Molto, None; P. Lafforgue, None; T. Pham, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Couvaras L, Wendling D, Pauly V, Pradel V, Molto A, Lafforgue P, Pham T. Is a Primary Good Response to Nsaids Predictive of the Subsequent Response to the First TNF Inhibitor in Patients with Early Axial Spondyloarthritis ? [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/is-a-primary-good-response-to-nsaids-predictive-of-the-subsequent-response-to-the-first-tnf-inhibitor-in-patients-with-early-axial-spondyloarthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/is-a-primary-good-response-to-nsaids-predictive-of-the-subsequent-response-to-the-first-tnf-inhibitor-in-patients-with-early-axial-spondyloarthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology