ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2866

Microarray Pathway Analysis Comparing Baricitinib and Adalimumab in Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients, from a Phase 3 Study

Paul Emery1, Peter C. Taylor2, Michael Weinblatt3, Yoshiya Tanaka4, Edward C. Keystone5, Ernst R. Dow6, Richard Higgs6, William L. Macias6, Guilherme Rocha6, Terence P. Rooney6, Douglas E. Schlichting6, Steven H. Zuckerman6 and Iain B. McInnes7, 1Leeds MSK Biomed/Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom, 2NDORMS, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, 3Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, 4The First Department of Internal Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan, 5University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 6Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, 7University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: bioinformatics and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Gene Expression, Janus kinase (JAK)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 7, 2017

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy IV: Pharmacodynamic Markers and Therapeutic Intervention

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose: In RA-BEAM (NCT01710358), baricitinib (BARI), an oral selective inhibitor of Janus kinase (JAK) 1 and JAK 2, yielded significant improvements in patients (pts) with active RA who had an inadequate response to methotrexate compared to placebo (PBO) or adalimumab (ADA).1 We analyzed molecular pathways modulated by BARI compared with ADA after 4 and 12 weeks (wks) of treatment relative to PBO.

 

Methods: Pts (N=1307) were randomized 3:3:2 (PBO [switched to BARI after 24 wks], BARI 4 mg once daily, ADA 40 mg every other week) for 52 wks. Total RNA extracted from whole blood collected at baseline (BL), wk 4, and wk 12 was analyzed using the GeneChip Human Transcriptome Array 2.0 (Affymetrix). Probeset level data were summarized to a data-driven transcript level and analyzed using a mixed effects model on a log2 transformed response. Multiplicity was adjusted for by testing both within and between transcripts.

 

Results: Pathway analysis revealed that there was little overlap of the immune pathways modulated by both BARI and ADA at wk 4 with no significant overlap by wk 12 (Table). BARI downregulated JAK/Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription (STAT) signaling pathways, such as those induced by IFNs, IL-6, GM-CSF, IL-5, and IL-3. Expression of interferon responsive genes (IRGs) was downregulated by BARI and upregulated by ADA. BARI reduced IRGs by 75% at wk 4 in pts that had high IFN gene expression at BL. ADA modulated complement pathways. Of interest, STAT transcripts were reduced at wk 4 by BARI (STAT1, 2, 3, 5A, 5B, 6); by wk 12 several STATs (STAT 1, 2, 5A) did not differ from PBO. In addition to different pathways being modulated, there were additional differences noted in the number of genes modulated by each treatment (Figure). Using PBO as standard, BARI modulated more genes than ADA at wks 4 and 12; BARI resulted in more gene modulation at wk 12 than at wk 4, whereas ADA gene modulation was similar at wks 4 and 12. In addition, both the numbers and types of genes modulated by BARI diverged further from ADA at wk 12 than at wk 4.

Conclusion: While BARI and ADA both showed significant benefits compared to PBO in the RA-BEAM trial,1 gene expression profiling revealed significant differences between treatments. Notably, BARI and ADA modulated JAK/STAT or complement pathways, respectively, and the drugs had opposite effects on interferons. This analysis indicates that different, and possibly complementary mechanisms of action underlie each targeted therapy.

1Taylor et al. N Engl J Med 2017;376:652-62


Disclosure: P. Emery, Pfizer, MSD, Abbvie, BMS, UCB, Roche, Novartis, Samsung, Sandoz, Eli Lilly and Company, 5; P. C. Taylor, AbbVie, Eli Lilly and Company, Galapagos, GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, UCB, Biogen, Sandoz, Novartis, Janssen, 5,Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Galapagos, UCB, Abide Therapeutics, 2; M. Weinblatt, Amgen, BMS, Crescendo Bioscience, UCB, Genzyme, 2,Amgen, Abbvie, BMS, Eli Lilly and Company, Gilead, Merck, Pfizer, Novartis, Roche, UCB, Crescendo Bioscience, Genzyme, Samsung, 5; Y. Tanaka, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Takeda, Bristol-Myers, Chugai, Astellas, Abbvie, MSD, Daiichi-Sankyo, Pfizer, Kyowa- Kirin, Eisai, Ono, 2,Daiichi-Sankyo, Astellas, Pfizer, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Bristol-Myers, Chugai, YL Biologics, Eli Lilly and Company, Sanofi, Janssen, UCB, 8; E. C. Keystone, Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Hoffmann-LaRoche, Janssen, Eli Lilly and Company, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis, UCB, 2,Abbott, AstraZeneca, Biotest, BMS, Crescendo Bioscience, Hoffmann-LaRoche, Genentech, Janssen, Eli Lilly and Company, Merck, Pfizer, UCB, 5,Abbott, AstraZeneca, BMS Canada, Hoffmann-LaRoche, Janssen, Pfizer, UCB, Amgen, 8; E. R. Dow, Eli Lilly and Company, 1,Eli Lilly and Company, 3; R. Higgs, Eli Lilly and Company, 1,Eli Lilly and Company, 3; W. L. Macias, Eli Lilly and Company, 1,Eli Lilly and Company, 3; G. Rocha, Eli Lilly and Company, 1,Eli Lilly and Company, 3; T. P. Rooney, Eli Lilly and Company, 1,Eli Lilly and Company, 3; D. E. Schlichting, Eli Lilly and Company, 1,Eli Lilly and Company, 3; S. H. Zuckerman, Eli Lilly and Company, 1,Eli Lilly and Company, 3; I. B. McInnes, Eli Lilly and Company, Abbvie, Pfizer, Novartis, Roche, Janssen, 2,Eli Lilly and Company, Abbvie, Pfizer, Novartis, Roche, Janssen, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Emery P, Taylor PC, Weinblatt M, Tanaka Y, Keystone EC, Dow ER, Higgs R, Macias WL, Rocha G, Rooney TP, Schlichting DE, Zuckerman SH, McInnes IB. Microarray Pathway Analysis Comparing Baricitinib and Adalimumab in Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients, from a Phase 3 Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/microarray-pathway-analysis-comparing-baricitinib-and-adalimumab-in-moderate-to-severe-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-from-a-phase-3-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/microarray-pathway-analysis-comparing-baricitinib-and-adalimumab-in-moderate-to-severe-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-from-a-phase-3-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology