ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2839

Practice Patterns of Pneumocystis Pneumonia Prophylaxis in Connective Tissue Diseases:  a Survey of Infectious Disease Physicians

Rachel M. Wolfe1, Susan E. Beekmann2, Philip M. Polgreen2 and James E. Peacock Jr.3, 1Internal Medicine, Section on Rheumatology and Immunology, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC, 2Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, 3Internal Medicine, Section on Infectious Disease, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Opportunistic infections and treatment

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 7, 2017

Title: Infection-related Rheumatic Disease

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose: Potent immunosuppressive therapy for connective tissue diseases (CTDs) imparts an increased risk for opportunistic infections including Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP). High mortality rates have been reported in CTD patients with PCP which raises the question as to if and when prophylaxis for PCP is indicated. Unfortunately, the specific risk factors and precise indications for PCP prophylaxis in CTD patients remain poorly defined and are guided only by expert opinion and personal experience. Wide variations in PCP prophylaxis patterns among rheumatologists have been previously established. This study was aimed to evaluate patterns among infectious disease physicians.

Methods: An electronic survey on PCP prophylaxis in CTD patients was emailed to 1,264 adult infectious disease physicians who are members of the Infectious Diseases Society of America Emerging Infections Network.

Results: 631 (50%) physicians responded to the survey. Respondents were significantly more likely to work in an academic/university system (p = 0.02) and either be early (<5 years) or late (≥25 years) in their careers (p = 0.0002). Almost half (43%) reported that they did not make recommendations for PCP prophylaxis in non-HIV patients. Of those making recommendations for prophylaxis, there was little agreement on indications for prophylaxis. The greatest consensus for specific CTDs was for granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) with 53% advocating for PCP prophylaxis. Only about a third recommended prophylaxis for other vasculitides, lupus, lupus nephritis, inflammatory myositis and rheumatoid arthritis on high dose corticosteroids. Interestingly, the most frequent single response was “Not Sure” (35%) but this option was also often selected along with other specific CTDs (41% of total respondents). When questioned about specific therapies, corticosteroids ≥20 mg/day was the most frequently cited indication for PCP prophylaxis (87%). Few recommended PCP prophylaxis with DMARD therapy (both biologic and non-biologic) without concurrent high dose corticosteroids (2-12% versus 69-77%). Surrogate laboratory markers were not routinely used to guide decisions about prophylaxis (21%). There was no consensus for the specific indices although CD4 alone was the most frequent response. While the majority recommended discontinuation of PCP prophylaxis with tapering of corticosteroids (65%), there was considerable variability in the specific dose at which it should be discontinued. The most frequent response was below 16-20 mg/daily. 89% of respondents felt that guidelines about PCP prophylaxis would be helpful in their practice.

Conclusion: There is little consensus about PCP prophylaxis in CTDs among infectious disease physicians although certain diseases (GPA) and immunosuppressants (higher dose corticosteroids) are common indications to recommend prophylaxis. There remains much uncertainty in clinical practice with respect to the role for PCP prophylaxis in patients with CTD, both by infectious disease physicians and rheumatologists. Guidelines for PCP prophylaxis would be an important adjunct in caring for these complex patients.


Disclosure: R. M. Wolfe, None; S. E. Beekmann, None; P. M. Polgreen, None; J. E. Peacock Jr., None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Wolfe RM, Beekmann SE, Polgreen PM, Peacock JE Jr.. Practice Patterns of Pneumocystis Pneumonia Prophylaxis in Connective Tissue Diseases:  a Survey of Infectious Disease Physicians [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/practice-patterns-of-pneumocystis-pneumonia-prophylaxis-in-connective-tissue-diseases-a-survey-of-infectious-disease-physicians/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/practice-patterns-of-pneumocystis-pneumonia-prophylaxis-in-connective-tissue-diseases-a-survey-of-infectious-disease-physicians/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology