ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2438

Open Label Transitioning from Originator Etanercept to Biosimilar SB4 Compared to Continuing Treatment with Originator Etanercept in a Historical Cohort in Rheumatic Diseases in Daily Practice

L. Tweehuysen1, V.J.B. Huiskes2, B.J.F. Van den Bemt (PharmD, PhD)3, S. Teerenstra4, F.H.J. van den Hoogen5, C.H.M. van den Ende5 and A.A. Den Broeder5, 1Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, Netherlands, 2Pharmacy, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, Netherlands, 3Pharmacy, Sint Maartenskliniek and Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Netherlands, 4Biostatistics, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Netherlands, 5Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek and Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Netherlands

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: axial spondyloarthritis, biosimilars, Psoriatic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and treatment

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 7, 2017

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy Poster III: Efficacy and Safety of Originator Biologics and Biosimilars

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Blinded transitioning from originator infliximab (INX) to biosimilar CT-P13 was not inferior to continuing INX treatment.1 Open label mandatory transitioning resulted in a  slightly lower 1-year CT-P13 retention rate than for INX in a historical cohort.2 However, non-mandatory transitioning might be preferred above mandatory. Therefore, we assessed the effects of open label non-mandatory transitioning from originator etanercept (ENB) to biosimilar SB4 on drug survival and effectiveness in rheumatic diseases in daily practice.

Methods: In 2016, 642 ENB treated patients were asked to transition to SB4 by a structured implementation strategy with opt-out option. Consenting patients were eligible for inclusion in our study [BIO-SPAN]. ENB treated patients in 2014 were recruited as historical cohort. The 6-months retention rate in the two cohorts was compared. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to calculate HR for discontinuation adjusted for baseline characteristics (age/gender/diagnosis/ENB treatment duration/ENB dose interval/csDMARD/CRP) and with a robust variance estimator to account for repeated subjects. Reasons for discontinuation and change in DAS28-CRP, BASDAI and CRP after 6 months were assessed.

Results: 635 (99%) patients agreed to transition to SB4 of whom 625 patients (433 RA, 128 PsA, 64 AS; 55% women; age 57 (14) years) were included in the transition cohort. 600 patients were included in the historical cohort. Crude 6-months retention rates of SB4 in the transition cohort and ENB in the historical cohort were: 90% (95%CI 88%-93%) vs 92% (95%CI 90%-94%). The transition cohort had a significantly higher relative risk of discontinuation than the historical cohort (adjusted HR 1.57, 95%CI 1.05–2.36). Reasons for discontinuing SB4 (n=60, 10%) and ENB (n=46, 8%) were: lack of effect (43% vs 61%), adverse events (47% vs 28%), malignancy (3% vs 4%), pregnancy (4% vs 4%) and other (3% vs 3%). In the transition cohort, 17 patients restarted ENB, 32 patients switched to another biologic and 11 patients maintained biologic-free. DAS28-CRP, BASDAI and CRP were not statistically different between baseline and month 6 in the transition cohort. Due to a slightly lower baseline CRP (1 [0-5] vs 3 [1-5], p<0.001) and DAS28-CRP (1.9 [1.5-2.6] vs 2.1 [1.6-2.9], p<0.001) changes in CRP (0.5 (12) vs -1.5 (14), p=0.01) and DAS28-CRP (-0.01 (0.93) vs -0.26 (-0.99), p<0.001) at month 6 favored the historical cohort.

Conclusion: Open label non-mandatory transitioning from ENB to SB4 showed a statistically significantly but clinically not relevant lower retention rate compared to a historical cohort, similar to retention seen after mandatory INX transitioning. Non-mandatory transitioning, when executed optimally, might therefore be an attractive alternative to mandatory transitioning.

References: 1Jørgensen KK. Lancet 2017 2Glintborg B. Ann Rheum Dis 2017


Disclosure: L. Tweehuysen, None; V. J. B. Huiskes, None; B. J. F. Van den Bemt (PharmD, PhD), Pfizer Inc, 8,Abbvie, 8,Sandoz, 8,UCB, 8; S. Teerenstra, None; F. H. J. van den Hoogen, Biogen Idec, 5,Celltrion, 5,Janssen Pharmaceutica Product, L.P., 5,Mundipharma, 5,Sandoz, 5; C. H. M. van den Ende, None; A. A. Den Broeder, CZ, 2,Menzis, 2,ZonMW, 2,Amgen, 5,Boehringer Ingelheim, 5,Bristol-Myers Squibb, 8,Pfizer Inc, 8.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Tweehuysen L, Huiskes VJB, Van den Bemt (PharmD PhD) BJF, Teerenstra S, van den Hoogen FHJ, van den Ende CHM, Den Broeder AA. Open Label Transitioning from Originator Etanercept to Biosimilar SB4 Compared to Continuing Treatment with Originator Etanercept in a Historical Cohort in Rheumatic Diseases in Daily Practice [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/open-label-transitioning-from-originator-etanercept-to-biosimilar-sb4-compared-to-continuing-treatment-with-originator-etanercept-in-a-historical-cohort-in-rheumatic-diseases-in-daily-practice/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/open-label-transitioning-from-originator-etanercept-to-biosimilar-sb4-compared-to-continuing-treatment-with-originator-etanercept-in-a-historical-cohort-in-rheumatic-diseases-in-daily-practice/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology