ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2397

Bilateral Femoral DXA Scan in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Marco Massarotti1 and Marwan Bukhari2, 1Rheumatology, Royal Lancaster Infirmary, University Hospital of Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust, Lancaster, United Kingdom, 2Royal Lancaster Infirmary, Lancaster, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: DXA, osteopenia, Osteoporosis and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 7, 2017

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Clinical Aspects Poster III: Comorbidities

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: RA is in independent risk factor for osteoporosis and fractures. The diagnosis of osteoporosis is based on T-score at lumbar spine or hip and conventionally femoral BMD is measured at left hip. RA could affect hip BMD results as a consequence of impaired mobility and gait abnormalities related to the disease itself. Since treatment decision in patient with RA is frequently based on the FRAX tool score and it relies on hip BMD results, measuring the left hip only we could miss some patient with low BMD worth to be started on treatment.

Our aim was to assess if measuring BMD at both hips could increase the number of RA patients diagnosed with osteoporosis/osteopenia and potentially to be started on treatment.

Methods: RA patients who underwent a DXA scan at Royal Lancaster Infirmary between June 2006 and October 2015, and had both hips scanned were included in our analysis. We compared the prevalence of osteoporosis/osteopenia pending on the results of each hip using simple statistics.

Results: 1527 patients were included in our analysis. 1207 (79%) were female, mean age was 64.3 (SD 11.6), BMD levels (neck and total hip) were 0.85 g/cm2 (SD 0.15) and 0.90 g/cm2 (SD 0.17 ) at the left hip and 0.85 g/cm2 (SD 0.15) and 0.90 (SD 0.17) at the right hip.

According to left hip results (Neck or Total Hip) 198 patients (13%) were classified as osteoporotic and 621 (40.1%) as osteopenic, while according to right hip results 183 patients (12%) were classified as osteoporotic and 598 (39.2%) as osteopenic.

Overall 245/1527 (16%) patients could be diagnosed as osteoporotic with 136/245 patients having BMD levels in the osteoporotic range at both hips (55.5%), 62/245 patients (25.3%) at the left hip only and 47/245 patients (19.2%) at right hip only. No significant differences in terms of age, sex, BMI and steroid exposure were found among patients with discordant results between the two hips. Surprisingly a higher frequency of previous fragility fractures was observed in the group with osteoporosis at the right hip only compared to the one with osteoporosis at the left hip only (28/47 vs 23/62, p = 0.020).

Conclusion: Measuring BMD at both hips could increase the number of RA patients diagnosed with osteoporosis or osteopenia and consequently the number of patients started on bone sparing treatments. This strategy could eventually lead to a decrease of fragility fractures among patients with RA.

OP L hip +/R hip – OP L hip -/R hip + p
Patients 62 47
Age (Mean +/- SD) 69 +/- 12 71 +/- 11 n.s.
Sex (F) 83.8% 78.7% n.s.
BMI (Mean +/- SD) 25.7 +/- 5.3 25.9 +/- 5.1 n.s.
Steroids 56.4% 51.1% n.s.
Previous fractures 37.1% 59.6% 0.020


Disclosure: M. Massarotti, None; M. Bukhari, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Massarotti M, Bukhari M. Bilateral Femoral DXA Scan in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/bilateral-femoral-dxa-scan-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/bilateral-femoral-dxa-scan-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology