ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2040

Improving Quality of Care for Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients in an Underserved Area

Qingying Lai1 and Beverly Johnson2, 1Internal Medicine, Jacobi Medical Center, Bronx, NY, 2Department of Rheumatology, Jacobi Medical Center, Bronx, NY

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Quality measures and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 7, 2017

Title: Measures and Measurement of Healthcare Quality Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) has endorsed a set of quality measurements for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).  Our patient population was at two city hospitals which serve a large underserved population. This study is aimed to use these ACR quality measurements to assess the quality of care of RA patients in this population.

Methods:

This is a retrospective study conducted by chart review of patients with an ICD-9 or ICD-10 diagnosis code of RA that visited rheumatology clinic of two public hospitals in an underserved area between July 1st, 2015-July 1st, 2016.  All patients met ACR criteria for RA. We measured five ACR endorsed quality measurements (see Table 1) and compared between patients of different socioeconomic status (SES) and different provider type (trainees and attendings).

Results:

240 patients were seen in rheumatology clinic of the two public hospitals during the targeted time period, 89% of whom were of low SES defined as having Medicare/Medicaid or no insurance. Almost all patients were on DMARD (95.8%) during the index clinic visit and 35% were on biological DMARD.  The majority of the patients (7/11) not on DMARD were of low SES and were not on DMARD due to documented non-compliance and poor follow-up. All patients (83/84) with increased disease activity had changes in regimen except for one who refused changes. Among the 28 patients who were started on biological DMARD during the targeted year, 25% (7/28) had no tuberculosis (TB) screening documented within the prior 12 months (3 had TB screening more than 12 months prior, 2 were documented after initiation of biological DMARD and 2 had no documentation).  Less than half of the patients (43%) had Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) documented in >=50% of the clinic encounters. Attendings had a slightly better percentage of CDAI documentation than trainees (49% vs 40%) but the difference was not statistically significant (chi-square test, p=0.206). Only 7% of patients were on prednisone > 10mg daily for more than 3 months and most of them (10/13) had a documented glucocorticoid taper plan.

Conclusion:

Providing high quality of care to patients with rheumatoid arthritis in an underserved area is challenging. Our providers did a good job of initiating DMARD, escalating treatment in the face of high disease activity and decreasing high prednisone doses.  In these areas, the main limitation was low SES with medication non-compliance.  Areas for improvement are reaching 100% screening for TB prior to starting biologics and to achieve higher disease activity documentation rate. Based upon this study, a prospective intervention will be started in the clinics to improve TB screening and documentation of disease activity as an ongoing divisional QI project.

Table 1: ACR Endorsed Quality Measurement

   1

Percentage of patients with diagnosis of RA who were prescribed DMARD therapy within 12 months

   2

Percentage of patients with increased disease activity have changes in regimen (e.g. Change DMARD/glucocorticoid dose, add additional DMARD et al.)

   3

Percentage of patients who have TB screening documented within 12 months prior to receiving first course of biological DMARD

   4

Percentage of patients have >=50% total number of outpatient encounters with disease activity assessment

   5

Percentage of patients being on prolonged doses of prednisone > 10mg daily have documented glucocorticoid management plan

 


Disclosure: Q. Lai, None; B. Johnson, Johnson & Johnson, 1,TREG, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Lai Q, Johnson B. Improving Quality of Care for Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients in an Underserved Area [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/improving-quality-of-care-for-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-in-an-underserved-area/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/improving-quality-of-care-for-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-in-an-underserved-area/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology