ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1966

Risk of Tuberculosis in Biologic Users for Rheumatic Diseases: Results from the South African Biologics Registry

Clive Pettipher1 and Romela Benitha2, 1Rheumatology, Private Practice, Stellenbosch, South Africa, 2Rheumatology, Private Practive, Johannesburg, South Africa

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Biologics, registry and tuberculosis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 7, 2017

Title: Epidemiology and Public Health Poster III: Rheumatic Disease Risk and Outcomes

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

To evaluate the rate of tuberculosis (TB) in biologic users for rheumatic diseases in South Africa, a TB endemic country, the effectiveness of our latent TB (LTB) screening program, risk factors and clinical outcome.

Methods:

Documented cases of TB were collected from the South African biologics registry (SABIO), practicing rheumatologists and pharmaceutical companies. Data on demographics, LTB screening tests and prophylaxis, biologic and DMARD therapies, TB diagnosis and treatment outcomes were recorded. A matched control arm evaluated the risk of TB in non-biologics users.

Results:

96 TB cases were collected from June 1999 to June 2017 (RA=55 (57%), AS=27 (28%), PsA=4 (4%), JIA=10 (10%)). The rate of TB was 1,240/100,000 person-years for all biologic users (n=96) compared to the control arm of 0/100,000 years (n=0) with an incidence rate difference of 0.0124 (95% CI 0.007 to 0.018, p<0.0001). Of these, 60/96 (62.5%) had pulmonary and 36/96 (37.5%) had extra-pulmonary disease. Reactivation TB occurred in 45/96 (51%) cases, despite a vigilant LTB screening program; new TB in 49/96 (47%) cases and 2 were undetermined. TB occurred in all 7 biologics licenced for use in SA (adalimumab 48, infliximab 15, golimumab 3, etanercept 19, tocilizumab 2, abatacept 5 and rituximab 4) with the majority from monoclonal TNF inhibitors (1,683/100 000 person-years) compared to etanercept (861/100,000 years) and non-TNF inhibitors (681/100,000 years). The incidence rate ratio (IRR) for monoclonal inhibitors compared to etanercept was 1.96 (95% CI 1.16 to 3.45, p=0.005) and 2.47 (95% CI 1.29 to 5.19, p=0.002) compared to non-TNF inhibitors. There was no significant difference between non-TNF inhibitors and etanercept (IRR 0.79; 95% CI 0.34 to 1.75, p=0.336). From registry data, it was extrapolated that 625 from 4830 patients (12.9%) screened LTB positive and were treated, yet 14 still developed TB (9 reactivation and 5 new onset TB). The majority (77) of TB cases, screened negative and screening was not done in 5. Steroid use, methotrexate use and male gender were significantly associated with acquiring TB (OR = 6.12; p<0.001, OR=7.5; p<0,001 and OR = 1.82; p=0.005 respectively), while the underlying rheumatic condition, race and geographic region were not. Two drug resistant TB cases and 6 deaths were recorded.

Conclusion:

TB poses a significant risk to all biologics users, including non-anti TNF’s in SA, a TB endemic country, despite our screening program. Concomitant methotrexate and steroid use further increase this risk.

Comparison of TB rates in biologic users across registries

SABIO

(RSA)

BSRBR (British)

BADBADASER (Spanish)

RATIO (French)

US National Data bank

Total number of patients

4 830

10 712

5 198

Not reported

6 460

Number of TB cases

96

40

15

69

4

TB rate using anti TNF per 100 000 person-years

1 387

106

172

116

52

TB rate using non-anti TNF per 100 000 person-years

681

Not reported

Not reported

Not reported

Not reported

TB rates of individual biologic agents (SABIO)

Sum of biologic exposure (years)

TB cases per drug (n=96)

TB rate per 100 000 person-years

Adalimumab

2,954

48

1,625

Infliximab

694

15

2,160

Golimumab

273

3

1,099

Etanercept

2,207

19

861

Abatacept

546

5

916

Rituximab

803

4

498

Tocilizumab

265

2

754

 


Disclosure: C. Pettipher, Have been awarded a research grant by Pfizer, 2; R. Benitha, Research grant from Pfizer, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Pettipher C, Benitha R. Risk of Tuberculosis in Biologic Users for Rheumatic Diseases: Results from the South African Biologics Registry [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/risk-of-tuberculosis-in-biologic-users-for-rheumatic-diseases-results-from-the-south-african-biologics-registry/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/risk-of-tuberculosis-in-biologic-users-for-rheumatic-diseases-results-from-the-south-african-biologics-registry/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology