Session Information
Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session
Session Time: 2:30PM-4:00PM
Background/Purpose:
The Flare-RA questionnaire was developed and validated in French (1) for assessing the occurrence of a flare of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) during a 3-month period, and cross-culturally adapted for the English, Spanish and Danish languages. The objective was to assess its cross-cultural equivalence in dimensionality and scale calibration, conditioning its validity.
Methods: Patients included in studies in each of 4 countries (2 cohort studies and 2 clinical trials) were age 18+ years, had RA according to 2010 ACR criteria, were in routine care in three studies and attended a tele-health consultation in one study. Flare occurrence during the most recent 3 months was assessed at baseline and at 3 months of follow-up using the Flare-RA 11-item questionnaire. Flare was measured in two dimensions, namely arthritis-related (5 items) and general (6 items) subscales scoring from 0 (no flare) to 10 (maximum flare). Statistical analysis used exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses to determine dimensionality. Rasch modelling for scale calibration was used to search for differential item functioning (DIF) for countries, sex, and flare anchor (yes/no) using RUMM 2030®.
Results:
Overall, 571 patients (by center: 75, 105, 138 and 253) with mean±SD age 56.9±13.5 years and 75.3% female were included. Self-perception of a flare was reported by 39.9% of patients. Baseline RA disease activity varied by center. Mean DAS28 scores for each center were 2.1±0.8, 2.5±1.2, 2.9±1.2 and 3.6±1.4. Flare-RA items did not show any ceiling effect; mean score was 2.9±2.7 for arthritis-related and 2.5±2.6 for general subscales.
Principal component analysis showed a consistent first factor (65.7% variance), and demonstrated a strong bi-dimensional structure (75.8% variance)(figure). This dimensionality was stable over time and across countries in confirmatory analysis.
The Rasch partial credit model for subscales showed no local dependency, good person separation index (range 0.76–0.87) and good ordering of scale modalities. Only one item on “pain killer intake” performed less well, with less balanced ordering. Two items presented some misfit (fit residual>|2.5|) for each subscale. It was decided to keep them for clinical relevance. Finally, there was some significant but moderate DIF for countries in 7 items, all being uniform DIF. No interaction (DIF) was seen by sex, and only 2 minor DIF with flare anchor.
Conclusion:
This international effort confirms the solid bi-dimensional structure of the Flare-RA questionnaire, with arthritis-related and general subscales, and its good scale measurement properties. There was a slight DIF that might be investigated in larger samples, but it nevertheless can be used as a quantitative scale. These findings demonstrate that the Flare-RA questionnaire has validity for measurement and for international comparison across cohorts and clinical trials.
1. Fautrel B, et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017;69:309-19.
To cite this abstract in AMA style:
Guillemin F, Erpelding ML, de Thurah A, Myasoedova E, Schneeberger EE, Crowson CS, Maribo T, Citera G, Matteson EL, Fautrel B. Detection of Flare over the Past 3 Months in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Cross-Cultural Equivalence of the Self-Report Flare-RA Questionnaire [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/detection-of-flare-over-the-past-3-months-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-cross-cultural-equivalence-of-the-self-report-flare-ra-questionnaire/. Accessed .« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/detection-of-flare-over-the-past-3-months-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-cross-cultural-equivalence-of-the-self-report-flare-ra-questionnaire/