ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1437

C-Reactive Protein Levels in Patients with or without Structural Progression: A Post-Hoc Analysis from a Phase 3 Tofacitinib Trial

Roy Fleischmann1, Carol A Connell2, Haiyun Fan3 and Sander Strengholt4, 1Metroplex Clinical Research Center and University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 2Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT, 3Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, PA, 4Pfizer Inc, Capelle aan den IJssel, Netherlands

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: C-reactive protein (CRP), rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and tofacitinib

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 6, 2017

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy Poster II: Prognostic Factors, Imaging and Miscellaneous Reports

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We examined high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) levels in relation to structural progression in patients with RA receiving tofacitinib or methotrexate (MTX).

Methods: This was a post-hoc analysis of data from a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind controlled trial of tofacitinib monotherapy vs MTX (ORAL Start [NCT01039688]) in patients with early RA who were naïve to therapeutic doses of MTX. Patients were randomized to tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily (BID), tofacitinib 10 mg BID, or MTX titrated up to 20 mg/week. hsCRP levels through Month (M) 24 were analyzed descriptively for patients with structural progression at M12 (change from baseline in modified Total Sharp Score [mTSS] >0.5; mTSS progressors) and those without structural progression at M12 (mTSS non‑progressors). The proportions of patients who were mTSS non-progressors at M6, M12, and M24 were summarized for patients with baseline hsCRP level ≤7 mg/L and >7 mg/L.

Results: A total of 885 patients who had mTSS assessments at M12 were included in this analysis, of whom 345 received tofacitinib 5 mg BID, 371 received tofacitinib 10 mg BID and 169 received MTX. Mean baseline hsCRP levels were similar across treatment groups, but M12 mTSS progressors appeared to have a higher mean baseline hsCRP vs non-progressors in all treatment groups (Figure). On a group level, patients who were mTSS progressors at M12 generally had numerically higher mean hsCRP levels vs mTSS non-progressors over 24 months (Figure); effect was generally greater with MTX vs tofacitinib groups. At M24, mean changes from baseline in hsCRP appeared higher for M12 progressors (-21.5 to -27.8 mg/L across groups) vs non‑progressors (-12.6 to -16.7 mg/L across groups). Rates of mTSS non-progression appeared to be numerically higher at M6, M12, and M24 in patients with baseline hsCRP ≤7 mg/L vs those with baseline hsCRP >7 mg/L (Table). At M24, among patients with baseline hsCRP >7 mg/L, 59.5% of patients treated with MTX and 77.0% and 79.6% treated with tofacitinib 5 mg and 10 mg BID, respectively, were mTSS non-progressors, compared with 77.1%, 85.6% and 90.8%, respectively, among patients with baseline CRP ≤7 mg/L (Table).

Conclusion: Patients with RA receiving tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg BID or MTX who showed structural progression at M12 generally had numerically higher mean hsCRP levels through M24. Numerically higher rates of non‑progression were observed over time in patients with baseline hsCRP ≤7 mg/L vs >7 mg/L. At M24, structural progression was lower with tofacitinib vs MTX, regardless of baseline hsCRP level.


Disclosure: R. Fleischmann, Pfizer Inc,UCB,AbbVie, 2,Pfizer Inc,UCB,AbbVie, 5; C. A. Connell, Pfizer Inc, 1,Pfizer Inc, 3; H. Fan, Pfizer Inc, 1,Pfizer Inc, 3; S. Strengholt, Pfizer Inc, 1,Pfizer Inc, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Fleischmann R, Connell CA, Fan H, Strengholt S. C-Reactive Protein Levels in Patients with or without Structural Progression: A Post-Hoc Analysis from a Phase 3 Tofacitinib Trial [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/c-reactive-protein-levels-in-patients-with-or-without-structural-progression-a-post-hoc-analysis-from-a-phase-3-tofacitinib-trial/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/c-reactive-protein-levels-in-patients-with-or-without-structural-progression-a-post-hoc-analysis-from-a-phase-3-tofacitinib-trial/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology