ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1385

Decisional Conflict in Doctor – Patient Discussions about Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs

Rohit Nallani1 and Richard W Martin2, 1Michigan State University, College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, MI, 2Medicine, Rheumatology, Michigan State University, College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, MI

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Communication, Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, doctor-patient relationship and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 6, 2017

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Clinical Aspects Poster II: Pathophysiology, Autoantibodies, and Disease Activity Measures

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: There are few published studies describing patient-physician discussions about initiating new rheumatoid arthritis (RA) medications in real world settings. The purpose of this study is to describe the incidence of these discussions, levels of decisional conflict and its correlation with primary adherence.

Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study of consecutive RA patients attending a routine rheumatology clinic visits. Immediately after the visit, we identified all patients whom had a discussion about starting a new medication. We conducted immediate written and 30-day post-visit telephone surveys. This assessed patient preference, actions and decisional conflict about starting the proposed medication.

Results: Of 580 RA patients seen during the observation period, 104 (17.9%) patients confirmed discussing a new medication. 91 (87.5%) completed the follow up survey. Demographics: mean age = 55.4 years, 79.8% female, 7.7% minority, 3.8% with inadequate health literacy RA duration 7.5 years, and mean CDAI 20 (range 0-50). 65.4 % of discussions involved adding or changing disease modifying drug therapy (DMARD). Mean post-visit Decisional Conflict Scale score (DCS)1 was 18.3 (SD: 18.8), with 11.8% demonstrating high2 DCS. Mean 30 day DCS was 16.1 (SD: 18.4). There was no difference between immediate post-visit and 30 day DCS (p=.47). While 97.1% of patients intended to start the discussed medication, primary adherence was 68.3% at 30 days. Most patients identified “Too Risky” as the reason for primary non-adherence. There was no significance difference in decisional conflict between patients considering DMARD vs. non-DMARD therapy.

Conclusion: Discussions to start or change medications occurred daily in community rheumatology practice. Despite short times of deliberation after visits, patients reported high levels of feeling informed about benefits and harms and had relatively low levels of decisional conflict. This raises questions about the depth and quality of patient deliberation following physician – patient discussions about initiating new DMARD therapy.

References:

1. O’Connor AM. Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Making. 1995; 15(1):25-30.

2. O’Connor AM. User Manual – Decisional Conflict Scale. Ottawa: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; © [updated 2010; cited January 20, 2017]. Available from: https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/docs/develop/User_Manuals/UM_Decisional_Conflict.pdf


Disclosure: R. Nallani, None; R. W. Martin, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Nallani R, Martin RW. Decisional Conflict in Doctor – Patient Discussions about Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/decisional-conflict-in-doctor-patient-discussions-about-disease-modifying-anti-rheumatic-drugs/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/decisional-conflict-in-doctor-patient-discussions-about-disease-modifying-anti-rheumatic-drugs/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology