ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1212

Relation of Incident Bisphosphonate Use to Bone Marrow Lesion Volume in Knee Osteoarthritis

Tuhina Neogi1, Jeffrey Duryea2, Na Lu1, Jingbo Niu1 and Yuqing Zhang1, 1Clinical Epidemiology Research and Training Unit, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 2Radiology, Brigham & Women's Hospital/ Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Bisphosphonates, bone marrow lesions and osteoarthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 6, 2017

Title: Osteoarthritis – Clinical Aspects Poster I: Clinical Trials and Interventions

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Bone marrow lesions (BMLs) are important contributors to pain and progression of knee OA. There has been recent interest in bisphosphonates as a potential disease modifier through amelioration of BMLs; however, there is theoretical concern that long-term suppression of bone turnover may be detrimental to healing of BMLs. One randomized controlled trial demonstrated beneficial effects of intravenous zoledronic acid on BML volume at 6 months, though this effect was no longer statistically significant at 12 months. We sought to determine the effect of commonly prescribed oral bisphosphonates on BML volume over 12 months.

Methods: We identified women in the Osteoarthritis Initiative who newly initiated an oral bisphosphonate (alendronate or risedronate) and who had a MRI at the visit at which they reported initiating a bisphosphonate as well as the following clinic visit (i.e., 12 months later) after initiation. We excluded women who reported use of other bone-active agents, such as PTH, calcitonin, or raloxifene. We propensity-score matched (see Table for covariates) bisphosphonate initiators to women who did not initiate bisphosphonate use with greedy matching, and used multiple imputation to address missing covariate data. BML volume was assessed using the sagittal turbo spin echo fat-suppressed intermediate-weighted MR images (slice thickness 3mm). A validated semi-automated process was used to segment the subchondral OA-related BMLs in the distal femur and proximal tibia to determine the total volume of BMLs based upon the number of voxels (0.382 mm3) within the outlined region of interest (intra- and inter-reader reliability: 0.96, 0.97, respectively). We evaluated the mean change in BML volume over 12 months among the bisphosphonate initiators compared with the non-initiators using multiple linear regression, as well as by proportion with changes in BMLs over 12 months.

Results: We identified 145 bisphosphonate initiators, who were well-matched to their comparators (mean age 65, mean BMI 26.2). A similar proportion of bisphosphonate initiators and non-initiators had BMLs at their index visit (51% vs. 47%, p=0.3). The proportion of subjects with decrease, increased, or unchanged BML volumes over time were similar in both groups, though there was a trend towards decreased BMLs in the bisphosphonate initiators (Table). However, mean change in total BML volume for the whole sample, regardless of presence of baseline BMLs, was not significantly different between the two groups (difference in mean change in total BML volume: 98.8mm3, 95% CI -156.6 to +354.2, p=0.4).

Conclusion: In this ‘real-world’ setting of women starting bisphosphonates, we found no clear evidence of benefit or harm of oral bisphosphonate use over a 12-month period on BML volume. Longer term follow-up is likely necessary to better appreciate the effects of bisphosphonates on BMLs in knee OA.

 


Disclosure: T. Neogi, None; J. Duryea, None; N. Lu, None; J. Niu, None; Y. Zhang, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Neogi T, Duryea J, Lu N, Niu J, Zhang Y. Relation of Incident Bisphosphonate Use to Bone Marrow Lesion Volume in Knee Osteoarthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/relation-of-incident-bisphosphonate-use-to-bone-marrow-lesion-volume-in-knee-osteoarthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/relation-of-incident-bisphosphonate-use-to-bone-marrow-lesion-volume-in-knee-osteoarthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology