ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 684

ANTI-RO52 KDa and ANTI-RO60 KDa Analysis in Systemic LUPUS Erythematous Patients to Detect ANTI-RO False-Negatives

Elena Grau Garcia1, Inmaculada Chalmeta Verdejo1, David Gimenez-Romero2, Eztizen Labrador Sanchez1, Merixell Fernandez Matilla3, Francisco Miguel Ortiz-Sanjuán1, Carlos Feced Olmos1, Nagore Fernandez-Llanio Cornella3, Karla Arevalo Ruales1, Rosa Negueroles Albuixech1, Jose Ivorra Cortes1, Jorge Juan Fragio Gil1, Isabel Martinez Cordellat1, Roxana Gonzalez Mazario1, Luis Gonzalez Puig1, Cristina Alcañiz Escandell1, Carmen Najera Herranz1, Ines Canovas Olmos1, Elvira Vicens Bernabeu1, Jose Eloy Oller Rodriguez1, Jose Antonio Castellano Cuesta3, Victoria Fornes Ferrer4, David Hervás Marín4, Marta De la Rubia Navarro1 and Jose Andres Roman Ivorra1, 1Rheumatology Department. Hospital Universitario y Politecnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain, 2Physical-Chemistry Department, UV, Valencia, Spain, 3Rheumatology Section. Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain, 4Biostatistics Unit. IIS La Fe, Valencia, Spain

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Lupus and autoantibodies

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 5, 2017

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Clinical Aspects and Treatment Poster I: Biomarkers and Outcomes

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Systemic lupus erythematous (SLE) is an autoimmune disease characterized by immune system disruption with autoantibodies production. One of the upregulated autoantibodies is the specific to the Ro antigen, a ribonucleoprotein associated to a small RNA, constituted by the 52KDa and 60 KDa polypeptides, whose epitopes are mainly conformational. The routine detection method for anti-Ro is an enzyme immunoassay, however, is possible to obtain false-negatives for anti-Ro and this could be avoided by analyzing both subunits separately. The aim of the present study is to identify false-negatives for anti-Ro by analyzing both 52KDa and 60 KDa subunits separately, as well as to characterize if there are clinical or molecular differences in this subgroup of patients compared to anti-Ro negative cases.

Methods:

A cross-sectional, observational study of patients diagnosed of SLE according to SLICC 2012 criteria was performed. In these patients a complete blood-test was made, and clinical data by personal interview was collected. INF1A, Anti-Ro, anti-Ro52KDa and anti-Ro60KDa levels where measured by colorimetric methods. Biostatistical analysis was performed with R 3.3.2.

Results:

We selected 69 SLE patients with negative results for anti-Ro (2.34±4.17 U/mL) out of 142 total SLE patients. A total of 51 patients were negative for both anti-Ro subunits and 18 cases presented positive results (up to 20 pg/mL) for at least one of them.

NEGATIVES N=51

Anti-RO52KDa POSITIVES

N=8

Anti-RO60KDa POSITIVES N=2

Anti-RO52KDa / Anti-RO60KDa POSITIVES N=8

Anti-RO [U/mL] Mean (DS) 1.92 (3.11) 1.65 (3.2) 0.5 (0.71) 6.15 (8.37)
Anti-RO52 KDa [pg/mL] Mean (DS) 1.26 (1.89) 147.24 (74.25) 1.05 (0.89) 196.82 (50.06)
Anti-RO60 KDa [pg/mL] Mean (DS) 1.73 (2.71) 6.3 (7.01) 120.96 (111.78) 145.22 (76.69)

The subgroup of patients that exhibit simultaneously high levels of anti-Ro52KDa and anti-Ro60KDa have higher clinical activity compared to negative anti-Ro cases (75% of active patients against 41.2% in anti-Ro negative patients). However, no differences in the accumulated damage evaluated by SLICC score between negative anti-Ro cases and patients with at least one positive subunit were observed.

We analyze serum levels of INF1A cytokine in the four groups of patients, and anti-Ro and subunits negative cases showed significant lower INF1A levels than the other patients (8.26±14.87 pg/mL and 26.62±40.71 pg/mL respectively; P=0.04). In addition, patients with high levels of anti-Ro52KDa subunit are those with the highest INF1A levels (anti-Ro 52+/anti-Ro60- 23.5±47.6pg/mL of INF1A; anti-Ro 52+/anti-Ro60+ 36.4±37.9pg/mL of INF1A).

Conclusion:

In our anti-Ro seronegative patients, a 26% of false-negative cases were detected. These cases with high levels of almost one anti-Ro subunit showed significantly higher levels of INF1A in contrast to negative cases, supporting the fact that they are indeed a different group from the negative cases. Moreover, the high INF1A levels could be the reason of the observed differences in the clinical activity measured by SLEDAI score in both groups.


Disclosure: E. Grau Garcia, None; I. Chalmeta Verdejo, None; D. Gimenez-Romero, None; E. Labrador Sanchez, None; M. Fernandez Matilla, None; F. M. Ortiz-Sanjuán, None; C. Feced Olmos, None; N. Fernandez-Llanio Cornella, None; K. Arevalo Ruales, None; R. Negueroles Albuixech, None; J. Ivorra Cortes, None; J. J. Fragio Gil, None; I. Martinez Cordellat, None; R. Gonzalez Mazario, None; L. Gonzalez Puig, None; C. Alcañiz Escandell, None; C. Najera Herranz, None; I. Canovas Olmos, None; E. Vicens Bernabeu, None; J. E. Oller Rodriguez, None; J. A. Castellano Cuesta, None; V. Fornes Ferrer, None; D. Hervás Marín, None; M. De la Rubia Navarro, None; J. A. Roman Ivorra, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Grau Garcia E, Chalmeta Verdejo I, Gimenez-Romero D, Labrador Sanchez E, Fernandez Matilla M, Ortiz-Sanjuán FM, Feced Olmos C, Fernandez-Llanio Cornella N, Arevalo Ruales K, Negueroles Albuixech R, Ivorra Cortes J, Fragio Gil JJ, Martinez Cordellat I, Gonzalez Mazario R, Gonzalez Puig L, Alcañiz Escandell C, Najera Herranz C, Canovas Olmos I, Vicens Bernabeu E, Oller Rodriguez JE, Castellano Cuesta JA, Fornes Ferrer V, Hervás Marín D, De la Rubia Navarro M, Roman Ivorra JA. ANTI-RO52 KDa and ANTI-RO60 KDa Analysis in Systemic LUPUS Erythematous Patients to Detect ANTI-RO False-Negatives [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/anti-ro52-kda-and-anti-ro60-kda-analysis-in-systemic-lupus-erythematous-patients-to-detect-anti-ro-false-negatives/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/anti-ro52-kda-and-anti-ro60-kda-analysis-in-systemic-lupus-erythematous-patients-to-detect-anti-ro-false-negatives/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology