ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 657

Dyslipidemia Management Is Insufficient in Psoriatic Arthritis Despite Increased Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality

Richard Koch1, JEAN BERNARD RUIDAVETS Sr.2, Yannick Degboe3, Alain Cantagrel3, Adeline Ruyssen-Witrand4, JEAN FERRIERES5 and Arnaud Constantin3, 1Department of Rheumatology, Purpan Hospital, Toulouse III University, Toulouse, France, TOULOUSE, France, 2DEPARTMENT OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, URM 1027 INSERM, TOULOUSE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, TOULOUSE, France, 3Department of Rheumatology, Purpan Hospital, Toulouse III University, Toulouse, France, Toulouse, France, 4Rheumatology, Purpan Hospital, Toulouse III University, Toulouse, France, 5DEPARTMENT OF CARDIOLOGY, URM 1027 INSERM, TOULOUSE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, TOULOUSE, France

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Cardiovascular disease, psoriatic arthritis and risk assessment

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 5, 2017

Title: Spondyloarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis – Pathogenesis, Etiology Poster I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is associated with increased cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality. Assessing individual CV risk and achieving the recommended LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) target could contribute to reduce the burden of CV disease in PsA. Aims: To compare the prevalence of CV risk factors (CVRFs) and history of CV disease (CVD) among French PsA patients and age- and sex-matched controls; to quantify individual CV risk using SCORE, QRISK2 and REYNOLDS risk scores; to assess the proportion of PsA patients or controls achieving the recommended LDL-C target according to their individual CV risk.

Methods: Observational case-control single-site study. PsA patients (CASPAR criteria), consulting a rheumatologist or hospitalized in the Rheumatology Department of a French University Hospital between March 2016 and January 2017, were included in the study after informed consent was obtained. Age- and sex-matched controls (2:1) were extracted from the Mona Lisa, general population study. CVRF and history of CVD were collected and compared between PsA patients and controls. Individual CV risk was quantified, using SCORE (with or without using a 1.5 multiplication factor), QRISK2 (with or without including PsA as a CVRF) and REYNOLDS risk scores and compared between PsA patients and controls. The proportion of PsA patients or controls achieving the recommended LDL-C target according to their individual CV risk was assessed.

Results: 207 PsA patients and 414 controls were included in this study. CVRF and history of CVD were significantly increased in PsA patients in comparison with controls (Table1). Individual CV risk was higher in PsA patients in comparison with controls using SCORE (p=0.002), QRISK2 (p=0.001) and REYNOLDS (p=0.003) risk scores (data not shown). The proportion of PsA patients or controls achieving the recommended LDL-C target according to their individual CV risk, quantified using SCORE, was low in both groups (Table 2). Among PsA patients or controls with an individual risk score ³ 10%, quantified using QRISK2, only 22.9% or 35.8% were respectively treated with a statin.

Conclusion: Our study confirms that the prevalence of CVRF and history of CVD is higher in PsA patients than in controls. It shows that individual CV risk is higher in PsA patients than in controls, whatever risk score is used for its quantification. It highlights that a low proportion of PsA patients achieve LDL-C target (SCORE) or initiate a treatment with a statin (QRISK2) in spite of high individual CV risk.

Table 1. CVRF and history of CVD in PsA patients and controls

PsA patients

(n=207)

Controls

(n=414)

Mean or %

SD

Mean or %

SD

p

Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)

134

15

129

22

0.001

Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)

79

11

80

12

0.27

BMI (kg/m2)

26.6

4.9

25.2

4.0

0.001

Triglycerides (g/l)

1.24

0.72

1.06

0.63

0.001

LDL (g/l)

1.26

0.38

1.43

0.35

0.001

HDL (g/l)

0.54

0.14

0.59

0.14

0.001

Total cholesterol (g/l)

2.04

0.43

2.23

0.38

0.001

Hypertension

34.4

26.3

0.03

Diabetes 1 and 2

12.1

7.7

0.09

Dyslipidemia

25.1

42.0

0.001

Smoking

0.04

Never

42.0

48.1

Current

24.2

15.9

Former

33.8

36.0

Metabolic syndrome (NCEP2)

28.4

11.6

0.001

Myocardial infarction

5.8

2.9

0.08

Cerebrovascular stroke

2.4

1.0

0.18

Peripheral arterial disease

1.5

0.5

0.23

Cardiovascular disease

8.7

4.1

0.03

Table 2: Proportion of PsA patients or controls achieving LDL-C target (SCORE)

SCORE

LDL-C Target

PsA

n

%

Controls

n

%

p

SCORE < 5 %

LDL-C <1.15 g/l

SCORE 5-9 %

LDL-C < 1 g/l

SCORE ³ 10 %

LDL-C < 0.7 g/l

122

50

28

1

51

7

41

3.6

13.7

286

63

68

3

56

2

22

4.4

3.6

0.002

0.81

0.27


Disclosure: R. Koch, None; J. B. RUIDAVETS Sr., None; Y. Degboe, None; A. Cantagrel, None; A. Ruyssen-Witrand, None; J. FERRIERES, None; A. Constantin, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Koch R, RUIDAVETS JB Sr., Degboe Y, Cantagrel A, Ruyssen-Witrand A, FERRIERES J, Constantin A. Dyslipidemia Management Is Insufficient in Psoriatic Arthritis Despite Increased Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/dyslipidemia-management-is-insufficient-in-psoriatic-arthritis-despite-increased-cardiovascular-morbidity-and-mortality/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/dyslipidemia-management-is-insufficient-in-psoriatic-arthritis-despite-increased-cardiovascular-morbidity-and-mortality/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology