ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 627

Efficacy and Safety of Apremilast through 104 Weeks in Subjects with Moderate to Severe Psoriasis Randomized to Placebo, Apremilast, or Etanercept Who Continued on or Switched to Apremilast after Week 16 in a Phase 3b Study

Kristian Reich1, Mark Goodfield2, Lawrence Green3, Kristine Nograles4, Rongdean Chen4, Eugenia Levi4 and Richard G.B. Langley5, 1Dermatologikum Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany, 2Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, United Kingdom, 3George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, WA, 4Celgene Corporation, Summit, NJ, 5Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 5, 2017

Title: Spondyloarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis – Clinical Aspects and Treatment Poster I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Many subjects (sbj) with chronic plaque psoriasis exhibit nail and scalp involvement that can markedly affect quality of life and be difficult to treat. The phase 3b LIBERATE study evaluated efficacy and safety of apremilast or etanercept vs. placebo in biologic-naive sbj with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Efficacy assessments included effects on preexisting nail and scalp disease and skin lesions.

Methods: In this double-blind, double-dummy study, sbj were randomized (1:1:1) to placebo (PBO), apremilast 30 mg BID (APR), or etanercept 50 mg QW (ETN) through Wk 16; thereafter, all sbj switched to or continued APR (PBO/APR, ETN/APR, APR/APR) through Wk 104. The primary endpoint was achievement of a PASI-75 response at Wk 16 with APR vs. PBO; the secondary endpoint was PASI-75 achievement at Wk 16 with ETN vs. PBO. Physician assessments were conducted for overall psoriatic activity (static Physician’s Global Assessment [sPGA]); scalp disease activity (Scalp Physician Global Assessment [ScPGA], limited to sbj with score ≥3 at baseline [BL], indicating moderate to very severe scalp disease); and nail disease (Nail Psoriasis Severity Index [NAPSI], limited to sbj with active disease [NAPSI ≥1] in the target nail at BL). Responses were assessed through Wk 104 using last-observation-carried-forward methodology.

Results: The APR extension phase (Wks 16 to 104) included 226 sbj (PBO/APR n=73; APR/APR n=74; ETN/APR n=79). At Wk 16, PASI-75 response vs. PBO was significant for both APR and ETN; long-term treatment with APR maintained both PASI-75 and sPGA 0 or 1 response levels (Table). Improvements were seen in nail and scalp disease at Wk 16, and the proportion of responders continued to increase with APR treatment over 104 wks and in sbj who switched from ETN to APR (Table). ScPGA 0 or 1 was achieved by 50.0% to 59.2% of sbjsacross treatment arms, and mean percent improvement from BL NAPSI score ranged from −48.1% to −51.1% (Table); the proportion of sbj achieving NAPSI-50 response ranged from 48.6% to 65.2%. Adverse events (AEs) occurring in ≥5% of sbj during Wks 0 to 16 were diarrhea, nausea, nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory tract infection, headache, and tension headache; long-term assessment by exposure-adjusted incidence rates (EAIR)/100 sbj-yrs showed no increase with longer-term APR exposure. No increase in EAIR/100 sbj-yrs of serious AEs occurred during the APR extension phase (4.01 to 5.49, across groups) vs. Wks 0 to 16 (PBO 0.0; APR 12.57; ETN 7.91). Changes in laboratory parameters were infrequent and transient; EAIR/100 sbj-yrs remained low across groups through 104 wks.

Conclusion: APR demonstrated efficacy through Wk 104 in sbj who continued APR and sbj who switched from PBO or ETN to APR at Wk 16. The AE profile remained consistent with prolonged APR exposure; no new safety or tolerability issues were observed through Wk 104 in sbj with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

 


Disclosure: K. Reich, AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene Corporation, Centocor, Covagen, Eli Lilly, Forward Pharma, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen-Cilag, LEO Pharma, Medac, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Novartis, Ocean Pharma, Pfizer Wyeth, Regeneron, Takeda, UCB Pharma,, 5,AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene Corporation, Centocor, Covagen, Eli Lilly, Forward Pharma, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen-Cilag, LEO Pharma, Medac, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Novartis, Ocean Pharma, Pfizer Wyeth, Regeneron, Takeda, UCB Pharma,, 5; M. Goodfield, None; L. Green, AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene Corporation, LEO Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, and Valeant, 5,AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene Corporation, LEO Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Valeant, 8; K. Nograles, Celgene Corporation, 3; R. Chen, Celgene Corporation, 3; E. Levi, Celgene Corporation, 3; R. G. B. Langley, AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, LEO Pharma, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, 9.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Reich K, Goodfield M, Green L, Nograles K, Chen R, Levi E, Langley RGB. Efficacy and Safety of Apremilast through 104 Weeks in Subjects with Moderate to Severe Psoriasis Randomized to Placebo, Apremilast, or Etanercept Who Continued on or Switched to Apremilast after Week 16 in a Phase 3b Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-and-safety-of-apremilast-through-104-weeks-in-subjects-with-moderate-to-severe-psoriasis-randomized-to-placebo-apremilast-or-etanercept-who-continued-on-or-switched-to-apremilast-after-week/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-and-safety-of-apremilast-through-104-weeks-in-subjects-with-moderate-to-severe-psoriasis-randomized-to-placebo-apremilast-or-etanercept-who-continued-on-or-switched-to-apremilast-after-week/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology