ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 525

Efficacy, Tolerability and Reasons for Changing Dmards, Biologics and Small Molecule Drugs in RA Patients without RA Lung Disease from a United States Tertiary Referral Center

Richard Meehan1, Isabelle Amigues2, David Muram3, Eric Hoffman4, Jim Crooks5, Tho Truong6 and Pearlanne Zelarney7, 1MEDICINE, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO, 2Division of Rheumatology, Columbia University, College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, NY, 3Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, 4Medicine/Rheumatology, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO, 5Biostatistics, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO, 6Rheumatology, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO, 7Bioinformatics, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Biologic agents, DMARDs, drug therapy, drug toxicity and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 5, 2017

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy Poster I: Comorbidities and Adverse Events; Efficacy and Safety of Small Molecules

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: The goal of therapy of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is to achieve a state of low disease activity (LDA) or remission and reduce joint damage and disability. When treatment with one agent is unsuccessful, an alternative DMARD, biologic or small molecule drug will be prescribed. This retrospective study reports the frequency and reasons for drug changes in RA patients in a tertiary US academic practice.

Methods: Records of 1300 RA patients were reviewed by 3 rheumatologists to select patients who received at least one biologic (b) DAMRD, had no other rheumatic disease, no interstitial lung disease or chronic infections, and were followed for at least one year to be included in this report. The study cohort consists of 198 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Patient demographics, drugs used, duration of use, and reasons for change of therapy were recorded.

Results: Of the 198 patients, 75% were females, average age was 51, 65% were ACPA positive, and 31% of patients had erosions at first visit. Patient demographics are summarized in Table 1. These patients received an average of 2.5 drugs before their first visit. They changed to a new drug an average of 2.4 times during their average follow up visits of 6.2 years. The longest average duration of continuous use for any of the DMARDs was 6-24 months (Table 2). The main reasons for discontinuation of these medications were lack of efficacy and the occurrence of adverse events (AEs). The rate of AEs among patients receiving bDMARDs was similar to that in patients receiving conventional DMARDS. The reasons for discontinuation of specific medications are summarized in Table 3.

Conclusion: This retrospective review suggests that most patients with RA will require a change of therapy every 2-3 years, primarily due to perceived lack of efficacy or the occurrence of AEs. The frequent change of therapy in patients with chronic disease like RA suggests that patients will use many different drugs in the course of their illness. In the absence of an effective biomarker that predicts response to a specific medication, therapeutic agents selected may not be efficacious and require early recognition of lack of efficacy and subsequent change of therapy.

 

 

 

 

 


Disclosure: R. Meehan, Eli Lilly and Company, 2; I. Amigues, None; D. Muram, Eli Lilly and Company, 1,Eli Lilly and Company, 3; E. Hoffman, Eli Lilly and Company, 2; J. Crooks, Eli Lilly and Company, 2; T. Truong, None; P. Zelarney, Eli Lilly and Company, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Meehan R, Amigues I, Muram D, Hoffman E, Crooks J, Truong T, Zelarney P. Efficacy, Tolerability and Reasons for Changing Dmards, Biologics and Small Molecule Drugs in RA Patients without RA Lung Disease from a United States Tertiary Referral Center [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-tolerability-and-reasons-for-changing-dmards-biologics-and-small-molecule-drugs-in-ra-patients-without-ra-lung-disease-from-a-united-states-tertiary-referral-center/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-tolerability-and-reasons-for-changing-dmards-biologics-and-small-molecule-drugs-in-ra-patients-without-ra-lung-disease-from-a-united-states-tertiary-referral-center/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology