ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 468

Initiation of Biologic Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drug Therapy and Associated Changes in Disease Activity Measures in Routine Clinical Practice: Findings from a Large Contemporaneous Real World Cohort

Zhaohui Su1, Tom Brecht1, Anna Lafontant1, Costas Boussios1, Francis O’Donovan2, Charles Kekeh2, Kathryn Starzyk1, Richard Gliklich3 and Vandana Menon1, 1Research, OM1, Inc, Cambridge, MA, 2Data Science, OM1, Inc, Cambridge, MA, 3OM1, Inc, Cambridge, MA

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: CER, DMARDs and Disease Activity

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 5, 2017

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Clinical Aspects Poster I: Treatment Patterns and Response

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

While many clinical trials provide direct comparisons between biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARD) and nonbiologic DMARD (nDMARD), there is a need for additional evidence on the effectiveness of these therapies in routine clinical practice. We evaluated changes in disease activity measures associated with bDMARD therapy, in a large cohort of patients with RA, under conditions of routine clinical practice.

Methods:

The OM1 platform collects, links, and leverages, structured and unstructured data from electronic medical records (EMR) and other sources in an ongoing and continuously updating manner. The OM1 RA Cohort includes data on >75,000 patients treated by rheumatologists. This analysis included patients who were treated with nDMARD between January 2013 and April 2017, had not received prior treatment with bDMARD, and either added or switched to another nDMARD or initiated bDMARD during the observation period (date of change in therapy is the index date). Established American College of Rheumatology cutpoints for standard disease activity measures (RAPID-3, CDAI, DAS28) were used to define remission. Advanced natural language processing was used to impute missing disease activity categories. Drug eras were defined using Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) definitions. Survival analyses were conducted to evaluate time to initial remission and confirmed remission defined as 2 consecutive scores denoting remission. To reduce the impact of subsequent treatment changes, data were censored at 12 months. Patients who switched or added nDMARD but subsequently initiated bDMARDs within 6 months after the index date were excluded in sensitivity analyses. To reduce the bias that more frequent disease activity measures may be associated with shorter time to remission, we matched the two groups on average number of disease activity measures per patient.

Results: The analysis cohort included 4,957 patients who met study inclusion criteria, none of whom were in remission at index date; 1,334 added or switched to another nDMARD and 3,623 added or switched to a bDMARD. There were an average of 4.2 disease activity measures per patient and a total of 20,605 disease activity measures during the 12 month study period. A larger proportion of patients in the bDMARD group achieved initial remission (18% versus 16%, p<0.05) and confirmed remission (13% versus 11%, p<0.05) compared to the nDMARD group. Time to remission was significantly shorter in the bDMARD group (mean±SD=5.2±3.4 months) compared to the nDMARD group (5.7±3.2 months, p<0.05). These results were unchanged in the sensitivity analysis.

Conclusion: Disease activity improved with changes in DMARD therapy; however, the addition of bDMARDs were associated with significantly shorter time to remission. This study uses novel data collection techniques to replicate findings from prior observational studies in a much larger and contemporaneous cohort of patients under conditions of routine clinical practice.


Disclosure: Z. Su, None; T. Brecht, None; A. Lafontant, None; C. Boussios, None; F. O’Donovan, None; C. Kekeh, None; K. Starzyk, None; R. Gliklich, None; V. Menon, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Su Z, Brecht T, Lafontant A, Boussios C, O’Donovan F, Kekeh C, Starzyk K, Gliklich R, Menon V. Initiation of Biologic Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drug Therapy and Associated Changes in Disease Activity Measures in Routine Clinical Practice: Findings from a Large Contemporaneous Real World Cohort [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/initiation-of-biologic-disease-modifying-antirheumatic-drug-therapy-and-associated-changes-in-disease-activity-measures-in-routine-clinical-practice-findings-from-a-large-contemporaneous-real-world-c/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/initiation-of-biologic-disease-modifying-antirheumatic-drug-therapy-and-associated-changes-in-disease-activity-measures-in-routine-clinical-practice-findings-from-a-large-contemporaneous-real-world-c/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology