ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 433

Predictors of Earlier Biologic Initiation Among Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Starting Methotrexate

Michael D. George1, Brian Sauer2, Chia-Chen Teng, MS2, Grant Cannon2, Bryant R. England3, Gail S. Kerr4, Ted R. Mikuls5 and Joshua Baker6, 1Division of Rheumatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 2Salt Lake City VA Medical Center and University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 3Division of Rheumatology & Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Nebraska-Western IA VA Health Care System & University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 4VAMC, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, 5Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 6Rheumatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Biologics, Clinical practice, methotrexate (MTX) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 5, 2017

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Clinical Aspects Poster I: Treatment Patterns and Response

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Biologic therapy for the treatment of RA has increased dramatically and has substantially increased costs of care. This study aimed to identify factors associated with initiation of biologic use, including previous methotrexate (MTX) adherence and dose.

Methods: We used U.S. Veteran’s Affairs administrative databases to identify RA patients receiving a first-ever prescription of MTX between 2005 and 2014 with at least 6 months of prior baseline data. Patients with prior biologic therapy use or those initiating biologic therapy within 30 days of starting MTX were excluded. Multivariable Cox analysis assessed factors associated with biologic therapy initiation within 2 years of MTX start, censoring at death. To assess impact of MTX adherence and dose on biologic use, we examined a subset of patients who received MTX continuously for at least 6 months with no biologic initiation during this time. In this population we evaluated associations between PDC (proportion of days covered) in the first 6 months and MTX dose at 6 months with subsequent biologic initiation.

Results: 17,634 patients met inclusion criteria contributing 29,350 person years of follow-up. 3,263 initiated biologic therapy within 2 years (incidence 11.1%/year). CCP positivity, later calendar year, and concurrent use of glucocorticoids, leflunomide, or sulfasalazine were associated with a greater likelihood of biologic initiation (Table 1). Factors associated with a lower rate of biologic initiation included advancing age, non-white race, greater comorbidity (Charlson score), congestive heart failure, and malignancy (Table 1, Figure 1). Among the smaller cohort of 9,851 patients remaining on methotrexate continuously for 6 months, methotrexate adherence (PDC ≥ 0.8) was not associated with likelihood of subsequent biologic initiation [aHR 1.00 (0.89-1.13), p = 0.94]. Higher methotrexate dose was associated with greater likelihood of initiating biologic therapy (Table 2).

Conclusion: Biologic therapy is initiated less frequently in elderly patients and those with comorbidities, possibly reflecting safety concerns. Future studies should evaluate whether these concerns lead to under-treatment of these populations. Surprisingly, low methotrexate adherence and dose were not associated with increased biologic use; the impact of reduced methotrexate effectiveness could be masked by differences in disease severity, follow-up, or medication preferences in these patients.

Description: Macintosh HD:Users:George:Desktop:Table 1.png


Disclosure: M. D. George, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2; B. Sauer, Amgen, 2; C. C. Teng, MS, Amgen, 2; G. Cannon, Amgen, 2; B. R. England, None; G. S. Kerr, Janssen, BMS, Genetech, Pfizer, 2; T. R. Mikuls, BMS, 2,Ironwood Pharm, 2,Pfizer Inc, 5,NIH, VA, 2; J. Baker, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

George MD, Sauer B, Teng MS CC, Cannon G, England BR, Kerr GS, Mikuls TR, Baker J. Predictors of Earlier Biologic Initiation Among Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Starting Methotrexate [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/predictors-of-earlier-biologic-initiation-among-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-starting-methotrexate/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/predictors-of-earlier-biologic-initiation-among-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-starting-methotrexate/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology