ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 349

Preferences and Satisfaction in a Pediatric Multidisciplinary Infusion Center

Catherine McDermott &1, Brian Sohl1, Lisa M. McGregor2 and Lisabeth V. Scalzi3, 1Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, 2Penn State Hershey Children’s Hospital, Hershey, PA, 3Department of Rheumatology, Penn State Hershey Children’s Hospital, Hershey, PA

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: infusions, pediatric medical center and psychological well-being

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 5, 2017

Title: Patient Outcomes, Preferences, and Attitudes Poster I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Many pediatric rheumatology patients receive infusions in multi-specialty infusion centers (MSICs). There is little data about pediatric patient satisfaction and preferences within MSICs and no data about their physicians’ perceptions of these preferences. In order to better understand and improve the patient experience, we studied these concepts.

Methods:

We created and administered a survey containing free response and 5-point Likert scale questions to parents of children receiving infusion therapy and their respective physicians at our center. We compared means and sums of the scores using t-tests and ANOVA analyses. 

Results:

We surveyed 21 physicians (8 oncologists, 13 non-oncologists) and 174 parents of patients with oncologic (n=66) and non-oncologic (n=108) diagnoses who were receiving infusions in our MSIC. Our results showed significant differences between family satisfaction/preference and physician perception (Fig 1).

For all 3 questions, families responded positively towards the multi-specialty nature of the infusion center, though oncology families to a lesser degree than non-oncology families (respectively, mean=4.5 ±0.07 vs. 4.8 ±0.05; p<0.009).

Rheumatologists had a greater discrepancy than oncologists did in their perceptions of their patients’ preferences, predicting their patients would be less satisfied receiving care in an MSIC than patients reported (Fig 2). In addition, rheumatologists believed their patients would prefer to receive infusions in a center specific for children without cancer, despite families not having this preference (mean = 1.3 ± 0.58 vs. 2.7±0.90; p<0.027, respectively).

Lastly, the majority of families surveyed reported they had increased awareness and empathy from exposure to children with other diagnoses, reflected in their comments (Table 1).

Conclusion:

Pediatric rheumatology patients are satisfied with their experiences in an MSIC. Patients are significantly more satisfied than their physicians perceive. As infusion therapy for rheumatologic conditions increases, it is important to understand patient preferences as a crucial aspect of patient-centered care. Patients are content to receive infusions in an MSIC and find value in their experiences with families of children with other diagnoses.

 


Disclosure: C. McDermott &, None; B. Sohl, None; L. M. McGregor, None; L. V. Scalzi, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

McDermott & C, Sohl B, McGregor LM, Scalzi LV. Preferences and Satisfaction in a Pediatric Multidisciplinary Infusion Center [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/preferences-and-satisfaction-in-a-pediatric-multidisciplinary-infusion-center/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/preferences-and-satisfaction-in-a-pediatric-multidisciplinary-infusion-center/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology