ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 793

Associations of Foot Forces and Pressures to Regional Foot Pain: The Framingham Foot Study

Jody L. Riskowski1, Thomas J. Hagedorn2, Alyssa B. Dufour3, Virginia A. Casey2 and Marian T. Hannan1, 1Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife & Harvard Med School, Boston, MA, 2Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, MA, 3Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Harvard Medical School & Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Foot disorders and pain

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Foot and Gait Disorders

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ARHP)

Background/Purpose:

Foot pain is a risk factor for disability; however, not all foot pain is the same. Foot pain etiology can vary by region (e.g., toe pain may arise from overlapping toes, forefoot pain from hallux valgus), suggesting its effects on foot biomechanics may differ as well. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate differences in foot biomechanics during gait by region of foot pain.

Methods:

Framingham Foot Study participants with complete data on regional foot pain, foot biomechanics, and foot disorders were included in this study.

A trained examiner conducted a validated foot exam to determine presence of the following structural foot disorders: hallux valgus, hallux rigidus, claw toes, overlapping toes and hammer toes. 

Biomechanical data were collected using a pressure mat (Tekscan Matscan) as participants walked barefoot at a self-selected pace. Data were processed (Novel Automask) to extract maximum force and peak pressure at the toes, forefoot, midfoot, and rearfoot.

Participants selected location(s) of foot pain from a graphic, with location options including toe, nail, ball of foot, forefoot, arch, heel and hindfoot. The eight locations of pain were collapsed into four regions: toes (toe and nail pain); forefoot (forefoot and ball pain); midfoot (arch pain); and rearfoot (heel and hindfoot pain).

Each foot was classified into one of seven groups: 1) toe pain only; 2) forefoot pain only; 3) midfoot pain only; 4) rearfoot pain only; 5) pain in two regions; 6) pain in three or more regions; and 7) no regional pain (referent).

A per-foot analysis using General Estimating Equations (SAS, v. 9.3) determined associations between regional foot pain and biomechanical measures, adjusting for age, gender, weight and presence of structural foot disorders. Alpha was set to p≤0.05.

Results:

There were 3158 participants (6280 feet) included (age: 66 ± 10.5 years; BMI: 28 ± 5.5 kg/m2; 56% women), with 2634 (42%) feet having one or more structural foot disorder.

After adjustment, individuals with midfoot pain had higher midfoot force with greater toe pressure (Figure 1), while those with forefoot pain had greater rearfoot force and less toe force, compared to the referent. Individuals with pain in toes, rearfoot, and multiple regions typically displayed lower rearfoot pressure and force relative to the referent.

Conclusion:                                                          

Region of foot pain is associated with biomechanical differences at the pain locale and other foot regions. These results suggest that region of foot pain may be associated with biomechanical differences during gait at other lower extremity joints (e.g., knee and ankle). As changes in gait affect mobility and fall risk, future work should evaluate how region of foot pain affects lower extremity function, falls and disability.


Disclosure:

J. L. Riskowski,
None;

T. J. Hagedorn,
None;

A. B. Dufour,
None;

V. A. Casey,
None;

M. T. Hannan,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/associations-of-foot-forces-and-pressures-to-regional-foot-pain-the-framingham-foot-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology