ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 3184

Antiphospoholipid Antibodies in Giant Cell Arteritis. What Can They Tell Us?

Alojzija Hocevar, Rok Jese, Ziga Rotar, Polona Žigon, Sašša Čučnik and Matija Tomšič, Department of Rheumatology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Antiphospholipid Antibodies and giant cell arteritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Wednesday, November 16, 2016

Title: Vasculitis IV: Diagnosis and Assessment of Disease Activity

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 9:00AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: The aim of our prospective study was to evaluate the potential impact of the antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL-Abs) on the clinical presentation of giant cell arteritis (GCA).

Methods:  GCA patients diagnosed for the first time between 1 September 2011 and 30 April 2016 at our secondary/tertiary rheumatology center and in whom aPL-Abs were determined at presentation were included. Three types of aPL-Abs were studied in the patients’ sera: anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL; IgG and IgM isotype), antibodies to β2-glycoprotein 1 (aβ2GP1; IgG, IgM and IgA isotypes) and lupus anticoagulants (LA). The patients were stratified according to the number of positive aPL-Abs tests into three groups: without aPL-Abs, those with a single aPL-Ab and those with two or more aPL-Abs. Medical records of GCA cases were analyzed and data compared between the three groups.

Results:  During the 56-month observation period we performed aPL-Abs tests in 97/115 GCA patients (67 (69%) females, median (IQR) age 73.3 (67.2; 78.2) years). aCL, aβ2GP1 and LA were present in 47 (48%), 17 (18%) and 44 (45%) cases, respectively. 39 (40%) patients had single aPL-Ab, 28% had two and 5% had three aPL-Abs. aPL-Abs were not detected in 26 (27%) patients. Characteristics of aPL-Abs negative vs. positive (single and double or triple) groups are presented in Table 1. GCA patients with at least two aPL-Abs had more commonly had severe visual manifestations (transient and permanent visual loss) at presentation (100% vs. 22% of all visual disturbances; p=0.021), as well as symptoms (19% vs. 0%, p=0.029) and ultrasonographic signs of large vessel vasculitis (62% vs. 33%, p=0.054) than those without aPL-Abs. At least 1 year follow-up data (median (IQR) 101 (50.4; 104.4) weeks) were available in 71 patients. 35 (49%) patients relapsed during follow-up and relapses were not associated with the aPL-Abs positivity at presentation in our group.

Table 1. GCA and aPL-Abs

aPL-Abs

(number of patients)

Clinical characteristics

aPL negative

single positive  

double or triple positive

N 26 39

32

Gender (F) (%) 57.7 66.7

81.3

Age (years; median, IQR) 73.6 (68.7; 78.8) 75.1 (67.3; 78.5) 70.9 (66.4; 77.2)
Smoking (%) 38.5 38.5 43.8
General symptoms (%) 73.1 71.8 78.1
Fever (≥38◦C) (%) 23.1 23.1 28.1
Weight loss (%) 53.8 53.8 71.9
Rheumatic polymyalgia 23.1 15.4 12.5
Headache (%) 69.2 74.4 62.5
Jaw claudication (%) 38.5 46.2 37.5
Visual disturbances (%) 34.6 30.8 15.6
TVL or PVL (%) 7.7 (22.2*) 10.3 (33.3*) 15.6 (100.0*)
Stroke (%) 0 2.6 3.1
Dry cough (%) 15.4 23.1 37.5
Clin. changed TA (%) 53.8 74.4 53.1
TAB (%) 81.0 80.0 88.0
CDS TA (%) 84.6 79.5 68.8
LVV – clinically. (%) 0 12.8 18.8
LVV – CDS (%) 33.3 56.8 62.1
ESR (median, IQR) 88 (66; 95) 85 (64; 113) 95 (75; 109)
CRP (median, IQR) 66 (49; 116) 76 (48; 129) 75 (54; 127)
Patients with a relapse during follow up (%)

55.0

43.3

52.4

Legend: aPL-Ab antiphospholipid antibody; F female; TVL transient visual loss (amaurosis fugax); PVL permanent visual loss; * % of those with visual disturbances; TA temporal artery; TAB temporal artery biopsy; CDS color Doppler sonography; LVV large vessel vasculitis; ESR erythrocyte sedimentation rate; CRP C-reactive protein;

Conclusion:  Our results indicate that aPL-Abs could identify a subgroup of GCA patients with severe visual manifestations and extracranial large vessel disease.


Disclosure: A. Hocevar, None; R. Jese, None; Z. Rotar, None; P. Žigon, None; S. Čučnik, None; M. Tomšič, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Hocevar A, Jese R, Rotar Z, Žigon P, Čučnik S, Tomšič M. Antiphospoholipid Antibodies in Giant Cell Arteritis. What Can They Tell Us? [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/antiphospoholipid-antibodies-in-giant-cell-arteritis-what-can-they-tell-us/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/antiphospoholipid-antibodies-in-giant-cell-arteritis-what-can-they-tell-us/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology