ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2955

Biologic Therapy in Severe Peripheral Ulcerative Keratitis (PUK). Multicenter Study of 27 Patients

Lucia C. Domínguez-Casas1, Vanesa Calvo-Río1, Olga Maiz2, Ana Blanco3, Emma Beltran4, L. Martinez-Costa5, Maria Concepcion Alvarez de Buergo6, Esteban Rubio-Romero7, David Diaz-Valle8, R. López-González9, Angel M. Garcia-Aparicio10, Antonio Juan Mas11, Natalia Palmou-Fontana1, Miguel Angel Gonzalez-Gay1 and Ricardo Blanco12, 1Rheumatology, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla. IDIVAL, Santander, Spain, 2Hospital Universitario Donostia, Donostia, Spain, 3Hospital Universitario Donostia, San Sebastian, Spain, 4Rheumatology, Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain, 5Hospital Dr. Peset., Valencia, Spain, 6Hosp. Rio Carrion, Palencia, Spain, 7Rheumatology Department,, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain, 8Ophthalmology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain, 9Rheumatology, Complejo Hospitalario de Zamora, Zamora, Spain, 10Rheumatology, Hospital Virgen de la Salud, Toledo, Spain, 11Rheumatology, Hospital Son Llàtzer., Palma de Mallorca., Spain, 12Rheumatology Department. Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Biologic agents

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2016

Title: Vasculitis - Poster III: Rarer Vasculitides

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:   Peripheral Ulcerative Keratitis (PUK) is a severe inflammation of the outer portions of the cornea that may be associated with systemic conditions. The progression of marginal corneal thinning may lead to perforation of the cornea and to rapid and permanent vision loss in the involved eye. Treatment of PUK is based on corticosteroids and conventional systemic immunosuppressive drugs. Our aim was to evaluate the response to biologic therapy in cases with severe and refractory PUK.

Methods:   Multicenter study of 27 (35 affected eyes) patients. All of them presented inadequate response to conventional therapy with corticosteroids and at least 1 systemic traditional immunosuppressive drug. The main outcome measures were visual acuity, signs of inflammation (scleritis and episcleritis), progression to corneal thinning, central keratolysis and ocular perforation.

Results:   We studied 27 patients/35 affected eyes (7 men/20 women) with a mean age of 57.2±16.3 years. PUK was primary (n=1) and in the 26 remaining cases, the underlying diseases were Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) (n=19), Psoriasic Arthritis (2), RA+Felty syndrome+common variable immunodeficiency (1), Behçet Disease (1), Type I diabetes mellitus (1), granulomatous polyangiitis (1) and microscopic polyangiitis (1). They received the following topical therapy: corticosteroids (n=18), antibiotics (17), lubricants (18), autologous serum (11), topical cyclosporin (11) and topical tacrolimus 0.03% (1). Besides oral corticosteroids and before the biologic therapy they had received iv methylprednisolone (n=8), methotrexate (16), oral doxycycline (9), azathioprine (3) and ascorbic acid (2). Moreover, 10 patients required surgery: amniotic membrane (n=7), penetrating keratoplasty (4), conjunctival resection (3), tissue adhesives (2), conjunctival flap (1) and lamellar keratoplasty (1). Anti-TNFα drugs were the most common biologic agents (n=19): Adalimumab (ADA) (10; 37%), Infliximab (IFX) (; 29.6%) and etanercept (n=1; 3.7%). In the remaining 8 cases the biologic agents were rituximab (n=7; 25.9%) and tocilizumab (n=1; 3.7%). The main outcome measures are summarized in the Table. After a mean follow-up of 23.7±20 months, all objective outcomes had improved with a reduction of the median prednisone dose from 33.7 [IQR 17.5-52.5] mg at baseline to 0 [0-2.5] mg (p=0.028). The main observed adverse effects were supraventricular tachycardia (n=1) and pulmonary Tuberculosis (n=1).

Conclusion:  In our series, biological therapy, especially IFX and ADA, is effective and relatively safe in patients with PUK refractory to standard systemic treatment. TABLE

Basal

1 week

1 month

6 months

1 year

Visual Acuity, mean±SD

0.54±0.37

0.55±0.35

0.58±0.33

0.67±0.3*

0.69±0.27*

Peripheral thinning #

85.7

80*

57.1*

40*

34.3*

Central keratolysis #*

17.1

8.6*

0*

8.6*

5.7*

Ocular perforation #

11.4

14.3

0*

0*

2.8*

Scleritis #

34.3

22.8*

8.6*

0*

0*

Episcleritis #

22.8

11.4*

5.7*

2.8*

2.8*

Uveitis#

14.3

14.3

8.6*

2.8*

2.8*

* p <0.05 compared with basal data# Data are expressed as % of the active eyes


Disclosure: L. C. Domínguez-Casas, None; V. Calvo-Río, None; O. Maiz, None; A. Blanco, None; E. Beltran, None; L. Martinez-Costa, None; M. C. Alvarez de Buergo, None; E. Rubio-Romero, None; D. Diaz-Valle, None; R. López-González, None; A. M. Garcia-Aparicio, None; A. J. Mas, None; N. Palmou-Fontana, None; M. A. Gonzalez-Gay, None; R. Blanco, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Domínguez-Casas LC, Calvo-Río V, Maiz O, Blanco A, Beltran E, Martinez-Costa L, Alvarez de Buergo MC, Rubio-Romero E, Diaz-Valle D, López-González R, Garcia-Aparicio AM, Mas AJ, Palmou-Fontana N, Gonzalez-Gay MA, Blanco R. Biologic Therapy in Severe Peripheral Ulcerative Keratitis (PUK). Multicenter Study of 27 Patients [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/biologic-therapy-in-severe-peripheral-ulcerative-keratitis-puk-multicenter-study-of-27-patients/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/biologic-therapy-in-severe-peripheral-ulcerative-keratitis-puk-multicenter-study-of-27-patients/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology