ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2086

Hexagonal Phase Phospholipid Neutralization Assay Is the Most Sensitive but Least Specific Among Nine Tests for Detecting APS in SLE or Non-SLE Patients

Katalin Banki1, Phillip Aleksiejuk2, Jessica Patel2 and Andras Perl3, 1Clinical Pathology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, 2Internal Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, 3Department of Medicine, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Antiphospholipid antibodies, antiphospholipid syndrome, diagnosis and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2016

Title: Antiphospholipid Syndrome - Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune, hypercoagulable state which may elicit thrombosis and pregnancy loss.  Although several tests exist to guide diagnosis of APS and SLE, their utilization has been highly variable among laboratories. Therefore, we have introduced a panel of nine tests and examined their sensitivity and specificity for supporting the diagnosis of APS in SLE and non-SLE patients at our Institution between 2010 and 2015.

Methods: 356 SLE and 288 non-SLE patients were evaluated for the presence of APS, as earlier defined (J. Thromb. Haemost. 4:295-306). SLE patients satisfied the ACR criteria for a definitive diagnosis (Arthritis Rheum. 25:1271-1277; Arthritis Rheum. 40:1725). Lupus anticoagulants were assessed in house on fresh samples within 24 h of acquisition by hexagonal phase phospholipid neutralization assay (HPPNA; delta <10 seconds; Stago, Parsippany, NJ), diluted Russell viper venom test (DRVVT; <1.2 normalized ratio; Stago), and platelet neutralization procedure (PNP; delta < 1 second) using a STA-R Evolution instrument (Stago). IgG, IgM, and IgA antibodies against β2-glycoprotein 1 (aβ2-IgG, aβ2-IgM, aβ2-IgA) and cardiolipin (aCL-IgG, aCL-IgM, aCL-IgA) were measured by Quest Diagnostics (Madison, NJ). Sensitivity and specificity for detection of APS was calculated in both SLE and non-SLE patients and compared amongst these assays by χ2 test using GraphPad software (San Diego, CA).

Results: 77/356 SLE patients had APS when using a combination of nine tests. Table 1 shows the frequency of positive and negative test results and p value for each assay in the SLE cohort. HPPNA has provided by far the greatest sensitivity at 73% for detecting APS in SLE patients relative to all other tests. In contrast, HPPNA has lower specificity at 85% as compared to all other test. While not shown, HPPNA also exhibited the greatest sensitivity at 78% for detecting APS in 61/78 non-SLE patients. Importantly, the 2nd most sensitive test for detection of APS in non-SLE patients was DRVVT at 14.3%; which was lower than that of HPPNA (chi-square p<0.0001). However, DRVVT had greater specificity at 96% for detection on APS in non-SLE subjects (p<0.0001).

Conclusion: This study indicates that HPPNA is the most sensitive but least specific assay for detecting APS both in SLE and non-SLE subjects. While it has been underutilized in a survey of 53 North-American Coagulation Laboratories (Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 134:764-773), these data clearly indicate the relevance of HPPNA for the clinical diagnosis of APS in patients who need long-term anticoagulation to prevent life-threatening thrombotic events.  

Table 1. Sensitivity and specificity of nine test for detection of APS in SLE patients

TEST

HPPNA

PNP

DRVVT

aβ2-IgG

aβ2-IgM

aβ2-IgA

aCL-IgG

aCL-IgM

aCL-IgA

APS+TEST+

54

15

16

11

5

8

21

18

8

APS+TEST-

20

22

51

55

61

58

52

54

61

APS-TEST+

40

4

5

0

8

9

5

23

3

APS-TEST-

226

141

234

262

258

257

262

247

245

p value

<0.0001

<0.0001

<0.0001

<0.0001

0.23

0.0039

<0.0001

<0.0001

<0.0001

Sensitivity (%)

73

41

24

17

8

12

29

25

12

p value vs  HPPNA

–

0.0009

<0.0001

<0.0001

<0.0001

<0.0001

<0.0001

<0.0001

<0.0001

Specificity (%)

85

97

98

100

97

97

98

91

99

p value vs  HPPNA

–

<0.0001

<0.0001

<0.0001

<0.0001

<0.0001

<0.0001

<0.0001

<0.0001


Disclosure: K. Banki, None; P. Aleksiejuk, None; J. Patel, None; A. Perl, Pfizer Inc, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Banki K, Aleksiejuk P, Patel J, Perl A. Hexagonal Phase Phospholipid Neutralization Assay Is the Most Sensitive but Least Specific Among Nine Tests for Detecting APS in SLE or Non-SLE Patients [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/hexagonal-phase-phospholipid-neutralization-assay-is-the-most-sensitive-but-least-specific-among-nine-tests-for-detecting-aps-in-sle-or-non-sle-patients/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/hexagonal-phase-phospholipid-neutralization-assay-is-the-most-sensitive-but-least-specific-among-nine-tests-for-detecting-aps-in-sle-or-non-sle-patients/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology