ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2011

Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium Versus Azathioprine for Patients with Moderate/Severe Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Results from a Phase 3, Randomized, Parallel, Multicentre Study

Josefina Cortés-Hernández1, luis Sáez-Comet2, Mercedes Pérez-Conesa2, M Rubio Rivas3, Francesca Mitjavila4, A. Castro Salomó5, Sandra Parra6, J. Cuquet Pedragosa7, Vera Ortiz-Santamaría8, M. Mauri Plana9, Segundo Bujan-Rivas10, P Suñé Martin11, Xavier Vidal12 and Josep Ordi-Ros13, 1Internal Medicine Department, Vall d´Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain, 2Internal Medicine, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain, 3Internal Medicine, hopital Universitario Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain, 4Internal Medicine, Bellvitge University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain, 5Hospital Universitari de Reus, Spain, Reus, Spain, 6Internal Medicine, Sant Joan de Reus University Hospital, Reus, Spain, 7Internal Medicine, Granollers University Hospital, Granollers, Spain, 8Rheumatology, Hospital General. Granollers., Granollers, Spain, 9Internal Medicine, Mataró Hospital, Mataró, Spain, 10Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, 11Pharmacy Department, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain, 12Statistical Department, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain, 13Internal Medicine, Systemic Autoimmune disease Research Unit. Hospital Vall d'Hebron., Barcelona, Spain

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: SLE and azathioprine

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2016

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Clinical Aspects and Treatment III: Novel and Current Therapies

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:30PM-4:00PM

Background/Purpose: Treatment of non-renal manifestations in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) remains challenging. To date, available data on the efficacy, safety and steroid-sparing effects of non-biological therapies is limited and provided mainly by small open-label studies and few randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The aim of the study is to assess the efficacy and safety of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPs) compared with azathioprine (AZA) for active non-renal SLE.

Methods: This is a 24-month randomized, superiority, open-label, multicenter study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01112215). Adults age ≥18 years with moderate-to-severe active SLE disease were recruited from 13 Hospitals in Spain. Patients were stratified by centre and SLEDAI-2k score (6-9 vs. ≥10) and randomized (1:1) to receive oral EC-MPs (target dose: 1440 mg/day) or azathioprine (target dose: 2 mg/Kg, according to TPMT levels when available), in addition to background therapy with oral prednisone and antimalarial agents. To have a ≥80% statistical power to detect a ~20% difference in clinical response between the 2 study groups, assuming a clinical response in the AZA group at 2 years of 40-50% we calculated we needed 120 patients in each group with a two-sided significance level of 0.05. Statistical analysis was by intention-to-treat. Rates of complete remission (CR) at 3 and 24 months were the primary endpoints. Secondary endpoints included time to CR, rate and time to BILAG A/B or BILAG A flares, reduction of corticosteroids and adverse events.

Results:  A total of 240 patients were included. More patients in the EC-MPs group than in the azathioprine group achieved CR at 3 (32.5% vs. 19.2%, p=0.027) and 24 months (71.2% vs. 48.3%, p=0.0005). Time to CR was shorter in the EC-MPs group (hazard ratio, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.91; P=0.017). BILAG A/B flares were observed in 86 (71.7%) AZA-treated and 60 (50%) EC-MPs-treated patients (p=0.001). Time to first flare was longer with EC-MFs (hazard ratio, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.3 to 2.56; p=0.0004). New BILAG A flares occurred in 26 (21.7%) AZA-treated and 10 (8.3%) EC-MPs-treated patients (p=0.004). Time to severe flare was longer in the EC-MPs group (hazard ratio, 2.84; 95% CI, 1.37 to 5.89; p=0.0029). Steroid reduction was superior in the EC-MPS group (p=0.024). Adverse events did not differ between groups except for leukopenia in the AZA group.

Conclusion:  EC-MPs was superior to AZA for treating active disease and preventing relapse in non-renal SLE patients.


Disclosure: J. Cortés-Hernández, None; L. Sáez-Comet, None; M. Pérez-Conesa, None; M. Rubio Rivas, None; F. Mitjavila, None; A. Castro Salomó, None; S. Parra, None; J. Cuquet Pedragosa, None; V. Ortiz-Santamaría, None; M. Mauri Plana, None; S. Bujan-Rivas, None; P. Suñé Martin, None; X. Vidal, None; J. Ordi-Ros, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Cortés-Hernández J, Sáez-Comet L, Pérez-Conesa M, Rubio Rivas M, Mitjavila F, Castro Salomó A, Parra S, Cuquet Pedragosa J, Ortiz-Santamaría V, Mauri Plana M, Bujan-Rivas S, Suñé Martin P, Vidal X, Ordi-Ros J. Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium Versus Azathioprine for Patients with Moderate/Severe Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Results from a Phase 3, Randomized, Parallel, Multicentre Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/enteric-coated-mycophenolate-sodium-versus-azathioprine-for-patients-with-moderatesevere-active-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-results-from-a-phase-3-randomized-parallel-multicentre-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/enteric-coated-mycophenolate-sodium-versus-azathioprine-for-patients-with-moderatesevere-active-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-results-from-a-phase-3-randomized-parallel-multicentre-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology