ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1697

Validity of Diagnostic Codes and Point Prevalence of Psoriatic Arthritis in Israel – a Population-Based Study

Lihi Eder1, Arnon Dov Cohen2,3, Ilan Feldhamer3, Sari Greenberg-Dotan3, Erez Batat3 and Devy Zisman4,5, 1Medicine, University of Toronto, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2Siaal Research Center for Family Medicine and Primary Care, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheba, Israel, 3Chief Physician's Office, Clalit Health Services, Tel Aviv, Israel, 4The Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Haifa, Israel, 5Department of Rheumatology, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: population studies and psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2016

Title: Spondylarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis – Clinical Aspects and Treatment - Poster II: Psoriatic Arthritis

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:  The information on the population-based prevalence of Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) is limited. Large population-based databases provide an opportunity to study the epidemiology of PsA, however, strict validation procedures for case ascertainment are required. We aimed to examine the validity of a diagnostic code for PsA in Clalit Health Services (CHS) database in Israel and to estimate its point prevalence in the general population.

Methods:  CHS database, Israel’s largest public health fund serving 4.3 million enrollees (>50% of Israel’s population), has real-time input from pharmaceutical, medical and administrative operating systems. CHS database was searched for all individuals who received their initial diagnostic code of PsA (ICD-9 code 696.0) in 2014. Cases were divided according to the type of specialist (rheumatologists, family physicians, dermatologists, orthopedics) who assigned the diagnostic code of PsA.. Approximately 25% of the cases in each subspecialty group were selected at random for the validation of a diagnostic code of PsA. All medical records of these patients were thoroughly read by two rheumatologists. Based on this information a decision was made whether the PsA diagnosis was 1) definite/probable PsA; 2) not PsA; 3) no data to verify the diagnosis of PsA. We calculated the positive predicted value (PPV) and the 95% confidence interval in each group. Several algorithms were examined to determine the method resulting in the highest PPV. The sensitivity and specificity for the selected algorithm were calculated and the point prevalence of PsA in the general population and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated.

Results: 869 individuals who received a diagnosis of PsA in 2014 were identified. 205 cases were selected for validation based on the specialty of the physician who assigned the diagnosis. The proportion of ICD-9 codes that could be confirmed by reviewing the medical records was 94%. The PPVs for a diagnostic code assigned by a rheumatologist or given during hospitalization was: 90.5% (95% CI 82.3%, 95.3%), orthopedics 18.2% (95% CI 3.2%, 52.2%) dermatologists 13.3% (95% CI 2.3%, 41.6%) and family physicians 50% (95% CI 29.6%, 70.3%). The selected algorithm comprised the PsA code assigned by a rheumatologist, or a permanent diagnosis code assigned by a family physician combined with use of DMARDs, or PsA code given during hospitalization. This algorithm had sensitivity and specificity of 88.7% and 88.1%, respectively. Using the validated algorithm, 3874 PsA patients were identified among a population of 4,296,000 enrollees in the CHS database, reflecting prevalence of 90 per 100,000 (95% CI 87, 93 per 100,000).

Conclusion:  Data within electronic medical records can be used to accurately identify patients with PsA. The estimated prevalence of PsA in the general population in Israel is 0.09%. This figure is consistent with other population-based estimates.


Disclosure: L. Eder, None; A. D. Cohen, None; I. Feldhamer, None; S. Greenberg-Dotan, None; E. Batat, None; D. Zisman, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Eder L, Cohen AD, Feldhamer I, Greenberg-Dotan S, Batat E, Zisman D. Validity of Diagnostic Codes and Point Prevalence of Psoriatic Arthritis in Israel – a Population-Based Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/validity-of-diagnostic-codes-and-point-prevalence-of-psoriatic-arthritis-in-israel-a-population-based-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/validity-of-diagnostic-codes-and-point-prevalence-of-psoriatic-arthritis-in-israel-a-population-based-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology