ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1643

Tofacitinib: Treatment Outcomes in Seropositive Versus Seronegative Patients in a Phase 3 RA Population

Paul Bird1, Stephen Hall2, Peter Nash3, Carol A Connell4, Kenneth Kwok5, David Witcombe6 and Krishan Thirunavukkarasu6, 1University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 2Cabrini Health and Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, 3Department of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia, 4Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT, 5Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, 6Pfizer Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and tofacitinib

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2016

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy - Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of RA. This study examined response to treatment with tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg twice daily (BID) in seropositive (anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide [CCP]+ and/or RF+) versus seronegative (anti-CCP- and RF-) groups of patients with moderately to severely active RA and an inadequate response to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.

Methods: ‘Serotype’ subgroups were defined at baseline as: anti-CCP+/RF+ (Sero-1); anti-CCP+/RF- (Sero-2); anti-CCP-/RF+ (Sero-3); anti-CCP-/RF- (Sero-4). Subgroup data were pooled from one monotherapy (ORAL Solo) and four combination therapy (ORAL Sync, Standard, Scan, and Step) Phase 3 studies. The proportions of patients achieving ACR20/50/70, disease activity score in 28 joints (4-variable) using erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-4[ESR])-associated remission and low disease activity, change from baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Short Form (36) (SF-36) physical functioning, and functional assessment of chronic illness therapy (FACIT) were evaluated after 12 weeks. Incidence of adverse events (AEs), discontinuation due to AEs, and serious AEs (SAEs) were compared among subgroups.

Results: In this exploratory analysis, baseline demographics and characteristics were similar between Sero-subgroups 1–4 (n=1551, n=249, n=142, n=449, respectively) for tofacitinib and placebo (PBO; n=670). After 12 weeks of treatment, all Sero-subgroups showed significantly improved ACR20/50/70 response rates with tofacitinib versus PBO (range: p<0.0001–p<0.05). The same range of significance was obtained for Sero-1 and Sero-2 versus PBO in achieving DAS28-4(ESR)<2.6; the lower treatment differences observed in Sero-3 and Sero-4 subgroups were not significant versus PBO. Tofacitinib showed significant (same range) changes in HAQ-DI and FACIT versus PBO for all Sero-subgroups, and SF-36 physical functioning with the exception of Sero-4 subgroup patients receiving tofacitinib 5 mg BID. Frequencies of AEs and SAEs were similar across all treatment groups and Sero‑subgroups. Tofacitinib-treated patients showed similar discontinuation incidence rates (per 100 patient-years) due to AEs in all Sero-subgroups (7.7–13.3 versus PBO: 8.6–19.7).

Conclusion: Tofacitinib treatment significantly reduced the signs and symptoms of RA, irrespective of anti-CCP or RF status. In this analysis, DAS28 remission rates and SF-36 physical functioning appeared to be lower in anti-CCP patients. Similar safety endpoints for tofacitinib treatment were observed across all Sero-subgroups.


Disclosure: P. Bird, None; S. Hall, Pfizer Inc, 5,Celgene, 5,Roche, 5,AbbVie, 5,Eli Lilly, 5,Janssen, 5; P. Nash, None; C. A. Connell, Pfizer Inc, 1,Pfizer Inc, 3; K. Kwok, Pfizer Inc, 3,Pfizer Inc, 1; D. Witcombe, Pfizer Inc, 1,Pfizer Australia PFE Pty Ltd, 3; K. Thirunavukkarasu, Pfizer Inc, 1,Pfizer Australia PFE Pty Ltd, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Bird P, Hall S, Nash P, Connell CA, Kwok K, Witcombe D, Thirunavukkarasu K. Tofacitinib: Treatment Outcomes in Seropositive Versus Seronegative Patients in a Phase 3 RA Population [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/tofacitinib-treatment-outcomes-in-seropositive-versus-seronegative-patients-in-a-phase-3-ra-population/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/tofacitinib-treatment-outcomes-in-seropositive-versus-seronegative-patients-in-a-phase-3-ra-population/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology