ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 783

Review of SLE Cohort to Identify Predictors of Response to B Cell Depletion in Patients with Active SLE

Pedro Mota1, Ashleigh Hennessey2, Ada Ferenkeh-Koroma2 and David A. Isenberg2, 1Internal Medicine, Hospital da Luz, Lisbon, Portugal, 2Centre for Rheumatology, Division of Medicine, University College London, London, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: B cells, SLE and rituximab

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2016

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Clinical Aspects and Treatment - Poster I: Clinical Trial Design and Current Therapies

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

The use of Rituximab (RTX) has been documented via published cohort data from over 20 sites worldwide (1,2) demonstrating its useful role in the treatment of Systemic Lupus Erythematous (SLE). UCLH have been using RTX for SLE since 2000 and have records from the 139 patients treated to date. The aim of this retrospective review of this cohort data to was determine if there are any relatively simple clinical aspects or bio markers that can help the clinician anticipate the likely response to B Cell depletion with Rituximab.

Methods:

Patients in the UCLH cohort are included once they meet ACR criteria for a diagnosis of SLE. During their routine clinic visits they have prospective data collected which was utilised in this review. Patient files were then reviewed to collect the available laboratory results. From this retrospective analysis 139 patients were identified as having received Rituximab, 121 patients were used in the analysis. We excluded 3 patients due to follow up time <6months and 15 due to missing BILAG scores for the times of interest. We compared the responders (defined using BILAG scores – Complete Response (CR) loss of all A’s or Bs; Partial Response (PR) loss of some A’s and B’s but not all, at 6 month follow up) versus Non-Responders (NR) these do not meet criteria for CR/PR, developed a new A or B during 6months follow up or had died. We only analysed the first dose of RTX with response for each patient.

The cohort is described in table 1.

Responders

Non-Responders

Complete Responder

(n = 52)

Partial Responder

(n=32)

(n=37)

Female

50 (96%)

28 (87.5%)

37 (100%)

Age at diagnosis

26.3 (8-69)

25.2 (10-59)

26.9 (8-51)

Age at RTX

34.4 (16-69)

33.2 (15-73)

34.9 (19-57)

Caucasian

29 (56%)

11 (34%)

13 (35%)

Ro

24 (47%)

17 (53%)

24 (64%)

La

11 (21%)

5 (16%)

10 (27%)

Sm

13 (25%)

11 (34%)

11 (30%)

RNP

23 (45%)

17 (53%)

16 (43%)

Fatigue

15 (29%)

8 (25%)

18 (49%)

Raynauds

9 (17%)

6 (19%)

8 (22%)

Photosensitivity

2 (4%)

1 (3%)

1 (3%)

Rash

31 (60%)

12 (38%)

25 (62%)

Alopecia

10 (19%)

8 (25%)

16 (43%)

Oral ulcers

10 (19%)

8 (25%)

10 (27%)

Arthritis

33 (63%)

25 (78%)

31 (84%)

Serositis

13 (25%)

9 (28%)

7 (19%)

Renal

18 (35%)

17 (53%)

15 (41%)

Neurological

4 (8%)

3 (9%)

6 (16%)

Haematological

12 (23%)

9 (28%)

11 (34%)

B Symptoms

8 (15%)

6 (19%)

8 (22%)

Lymphadenopathy

2 (4%)

5 (16%)

2 (6%)

Vasculitis

9 (17%)

6 (19%)

5 (14%)

Sicca Syndrome

3 (6%)

1 (3%)

2 (6%)

Myositis

1 (2%)

2 (6%)

0

No Steroids and ≥ 1 immunossupressor

5 (10%)

0

3 (8%)

Steroids

2 (4%)

2 (6%)

2 (6%)

Steroids and 1 immunosuppression

7 (13%)

4 (12%)

6 (16%)

Steroids and >1 immunosuppression

38 (25%)

26 (81%)

26 (70%)

dsDNA pre-treatment

mild elevation <5xULN,

17 (33%)

6 (19%) 7 (19%)
moderate elevation >5xULN

14 (27%)

17 (53%) 13 (35%)
CD19 depletion at 3 months 38 (73%) 27 (84%) 26 (70%)

Variables including age, sex, ethnicity, age at diagnosis, age at first dose of rituximab, clinical phenotype, ENA, previous medications, C3 levels pre and at 6months, dsDNA levels pre and 6months, CD19 count pre and at 3 months were examined via univariable analysis to determine if there was a statistically significant correlation.

Results:

Alopecia and fatigue presence were inversely correlated with response to treatment (p value 0.014 and 0.023, respectively) however for fatigue this was not maintained in the sub group analysis (comparison between complete responders and non- responders only). In this cohort there were no statistically significant association between response and CD19 depletion, dsDNA or C3 levels pre and post-Rituximab.

Conclusion:

During this retrospective review of the SLE cohort from UCLH we were unable to identify any routine laboratory biomarkers to predict response. In this cohort the only clinical feature was alopecia which was inversely correlated with response.

References:

1. Favas C, Isenberg DA. Nature Rev Rheum 5; 711-6; 2009.

2. Beckwith, H, Lightstone, L. Nephron Clin Pract 2014;128:250–254 Hannah Beckwith Liz Lightstone


Disclosure: P. Mota, None; A. Hennessey, None; A. Ferenkeh-Koroma, None; D. A. Isenberg, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Mota P, Hennessey A, Ferenkeh-Koroma A, Isenberg DA. Review of SLE Cohort to Identify Predictors of Response to B Cell Depletion in Patients with Active SLE [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/review-of-sle-cohort-to-identify-predictors-of-response-to-b-cell-depletion-in-patients-with-active-sle/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/review-of-sle-cohort-to-identify-predictors-of-response-to-b-cell-depletion-in-patients-with-active-sle/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology