ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 622

Efficacy after Transition to SB5 from Reference Adalimumab (Humira®) Vs. Continuation of SB5 or Reference Adalimumab By Antibodies Developed after Transition from a SB5 Phase III Study

Mark C. Genovese1, Michael Weinblatt2, Edward C. Keystone3, Asta Baranauskaite4, Soo Yeon Cheong5 and Jeehoon Ghil5, 1Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA, 2Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, 3Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, 4Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania, 5Samsung Bioepis Co., Ltd., Incheon, South Korea

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: biosimilars

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2016

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy - Poster I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose : SB5 has been developed as a biosimilar of the reference adalimumab (ADL). The 52-week efficacy and safety results were reported previously. 1 Here we report the efficacy results by anti-drug antibody (ADA) during the transition period.

Methods : Patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite methotrexate treatment were randomly assigned to receive 40 mg of either SB5 or ADL administered subcutaneously every other week. After 24 weeks of treatment, patients in the ADL group were re-randomized (1:1) to either be transitioned to SB5 (ADL/SB5) or continue on ADL (ADL/ADL) up to Week 50. Patients receiving SB5 continued to receive SB5 (SB5/SB5) but they followed the randomization procedure for blinding purposes. Efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity were assessed up to Week 52. Patients with detectable ADA were those who newly developed ADA or developed ADA with increased titer after transition.

Results : The proportion of patients with detectable ADA after transition was 15.7% vs. 16.8% vs. 18.3% for SB5/SB5, ADL/SB5, and ADL/ADL, respectively. In all treatment groups, the mean DAS28 tended to improve in patients without ADA while it tended to worsen in patients with detectable ADA between Week 24 and Week 52 (Figure). The mean change in DAS28 from Week 24 was comparable across treatment groups within each ADA subgroup. In other efficacy parameters such as EULAR response rates, proportion of patients with low disease activity and remission based on DAS28, there was a trend towards decreased efficacy in patients with detectable ADA compared to those without ADA (Table).

Conclusion : Patients with detectable ADA after transition were more likely to have reduced efficacy compared to those without ADA. Efficacy was comparable across treatment groups within patients with detectable ADA and within patients without ADA.

 

 

   

Reference 1. Weitnblatt ME et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2016;75(Suppl2): 487


Disclosure: M. C. Genovese, Abbvie, Amgen, BI, FkB, Samsung Bioepis, 5,Abbvie, 2; M. Weinblatt, Amgen, BMS, Crescendo Bioscience, UCB, 2,mgen, AbbVie, BMS, Eli-Lilly, Gilead, Merck, Pfizer Inc, Novartis, Roche, Samsung Bioepis, UCB, 5; E. C. Keystone, Abbott Laboratories, Astra Zeneca, BMS, Hoffmann-La Roche, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis, UCB, 2,Abbott Laboratories, Astra Zeneca, Biotest, BMS, Crescendo Bioscience, Hoffmann-La Roche, Genentech, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Pfizer, Samsung Bioepis, UCB, 5,Abbott Laboratories, Amgen, Astra Zeneca, BMS, Hoffmann-La Roche, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis, UCB, 8; A. Baranauskaite, Abbvie, Samsung Bioepis, 5; S. Y. Cheong, Samsung Bioepis, 3; J. Ghil, Samsung Bioepis, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Genovese MC, Weinblatt M, Keystone EC, Baranauskaite A, Cheong SY, Ghil J. Efficacy after Transition to SB5 from Reference Adalimumab (Humira®) Vs. Continuation of SB5 or Reference Adalimumab By Antibodies Developed after Transition from a SB5 Phase III Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-after-transition-to-sb5-from-reference-adalimumab-humira-vs-continuation-of-sb5-or-reference-adalimumab-by-antibodies-developed-after-transition-from-a-sb5-phase-iii-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-after-transition-to-sb5-from-reference-adalimumab-humira-vs-continuation-of-sb5-or-reference-adalimumab-by-antibodies-developed-after-transition-from-a-sb5-phase-iii-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology