ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 607

The Clinical Response to Biologic and Non-Biologic Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) According to Gender in a French-Canadian Population with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)

Sonia Lagacé1, Louis Bessette2,3, Louis Coupal4 and Denis Choquette4, 1Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada, 2Rheumatology, Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada, 3Rhumatologie, CHU de Québec - Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada, 4Rheumatology, Institut de Recherche en Rhumatologie de Montréal (IRRM), Montréal, QC, Canada

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Biologics, Clinical Response, DMARDs, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and treatment

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2016

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy - Poster I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Several studies have reported that women with RA had higher level of pain, disease activity and functional impairment compared to men. In addition, women also seem to response less than men to biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) and non-biologic DMARDs (nbDMARDs). Outcomes: Describe the disease activity and the clinical response to methotrexate (MTX) and bDMARDs in men and women with RA and evaluate the factors that could influence difference observed between genders.

Methods: Data on RA patients starting a treatment with MTX or a first bDMARD were extracted for the Rhumadata clinical database used in two rheumatologic centers. The baseline characteristics, the duration of the disease before the initiation of treatment, the concomitant treatments, the inflammatory markers (sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein) and the immunologic factor (rheumatoid factor, Anti-CCP) were extracted according to gender. A univariate analysis comparing the mean change between the men and women in the methotrexate and in the biologic groups was conducted for the « Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)» and the « Clinical Disease Activity Index  (CDAI) » at 6 and 12 months. A mutivariate analysis comparing those same parameters to adjust for the different baseline’s characteristics is being conducted.

Results: 922 women (mean age: 53 (± 13); mean disease duration: 1.3 years (± 5.3)) and 316 men (mean age: 57 (± 12); mean disease duration: 1.5 years (± 5.4)) started MTX. 548 women (mean age: 54 (± 13); mean disease duration: 7.6 years (± 7.7)) and 159 men (mean age: 56 (± 12); mean disease duration: 6.6 years (± 7.4)) started a first bDMARD (TNFi: 84%). In the univariate analysis, the mean HAQ score at baseline, 6 and 12 months were higher in women than in men in the MTX group. However, both groups had a similar means change in HAQ score at 6 and 12 months. For the CDAI score, women and men in both groups had similar score at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Mean change in the CDAI score at 6 and 12 months was a slightly higher in men than women in both treatment groups, but the change was not statistically significant.

Conclusion: In this cohort of RA patients, women seem to have a more severe functional impairment throughout their illness, but do not seem to have a poorer response to nbDMARDs and bDMARDs compared to men. The analysis evaluating factors influencing disease activity changes over time in men and women is ongoing. Table

Methotrexate

First Biologic Agent

Male Female P value Male Female P value
N 316 922 159 548
Mean HAQ Score
Baseline 0.68 (0.54) 1.04 (0.66) 0,0005 1.12 (0.67) 1.33 (0.63) 0,0030
6 months 0.26 (0.38) 0.64 (0.66) 0,0001 0.56 (0.63) 0.86 (0.72) 0,0035
12 months 0.30 (0.44) 0.68 (0.62) 0,0024 0.55 (0.59) 0.84 (0.69) 0,0001
Mean change in HAQ Score
6 months -0.43 (0.50) -0.37 (0.55) 0,5250 -0.48 (0.60) -0.41 (0.59) 0,4590
12 months -0.42 (0.49) -0.40 (0.63) 0,8451 -0.56 (0.69) -0.42 (0.56) 0,1683
Mean CDAI Score
Baseline 19.95 (15.50) 20.64 (13.25) 0,8077 27.68 (14.12) 24.77 (12.03) 0,1210
6 months 5.20 (4.05) 8.09 (6.56) 0,0429 10.29 (10.42) 7.39 (6.14) 0,1689
12 months 4.80 (8.20) 6.40 (6.79) 0,4788 4.85 (4.66) 6.38 (5.88) 0,2336
Mean Change in CDAI Score
6 months -11.94 (15.00) -11.40 (13.65) 0,8918 -21.10 (11.31) -18.03 (11.91) 0,2273
12 months -16.31 (18.37) -12.11 (13.83) 0,3784 -25.64 (12.79) -21.46 (11.50) 0,1257


Disclosure: S. Lagacé, None; L. Bessette, AbbVie, 2,Amgen, 2,BMS, 2,Pfizer Inc, 2,Roche Pharmaceuticals, 2,UCB, 2,AbbVie, 5,Amgen, 5,BMS, 5,Pfizer Inc, 5,Roche Pharmaceuticals, 5,UCB, 5,AbbVie, 8,Amgen, 8,BMS, 8,Pfizer Inc, 8,Roche Pharmaceuticals, 8,UCB, 8; L. Coupal, None; D. Choquette, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Lagacé S, Bessette L, Coupal L, Choquette D. The Clinical Response to Biologic and Non-Biologic Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) According to Gender in a French-Canadian Population with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-clinical-response-to-biologic-and-non-biologic-disease-modifying-antirheumatic-drugs-dmards-according-to-gender-in-a-french-canadian-population-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-ra/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-clinical-response-to-biologic-and-non-biologic-disease-modifying-antirheumatic-drugs-dmards-according-to-gender-in-a-french-canadian-population-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-ra/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology