ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 495

The Relative Performance of 28-Joint Disease Activity Score Based on C-Reactive Protein with Three Versus Four Components in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Ferdinand Breedveld1, Xin Wang2, Anabela Cardoso3 and Edward Keystone4, 1Leiden Univ Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands, 2AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, 3Torre Oriente, AbbVie, Lisboa, Portugal, 4Mt. Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: performance, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2016

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Clinical Aspects - Poster I: Clinical Characteristics/Presentation/Prognosis

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: The commonly used version of the 28-joint disease activity score based on C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP4) includes swollen and tender joint counts (S/TJC), CRP and the patient global assesment of disease activity (PGA), while the 3-component version (DAS28-CRP3) does not include PGA. We examined whether these two instruments can be used interchangeably, and if assessment of disease activity status and treatment response to a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi), such as originator adalimumab (ADA) in patients (pts) with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), differs.

Methods: This post hoc analysis used data from five randomized controlled trials: PREMIER, OPTIMA and CONCERTO enrolled pts with early RA who were MTX- and TNFi-naïve; DE019 and MUSICA enrolled pts with established RA and an inadequate response to MTX. The correlation between the two versions was calculated by Pearson correlation coefficients. The change from baseline in DAS28-CRP3 and DAS28-CRP4, and the number of patients reaching low disease activity (LDA, DAS28-CRP ≤3.2) or DAS28-CRP <2.6, was assessed at Weeks 12 and 24/26. Data from pts with non-missing DAS28-CRP-3 and -4 is included, pooled across trials by randomized treatment into ADA+ MTX, or placebo (PBO)+MTX.

Results: The DAS28-CRP3 and -4 versions showed a strong correlation (0.98, p<0 .001) for pts receiving MTX or ADA+MTX across all 5 trials, at both Week 12 and 24/26. Overall, in both treatment groups, most pts who achieved DAS28-CRP3 <2.6 (or LDA), also achieved DAS28-CRP4 <2.6 (or LDA) at both Week 12 and 24/26 (Table 1). Both versions were comparably responsive, with similar changes from baseline for pts in either treatment group, similar treatment differences, and response rate differences between pts receiving ADA+MTX and pts on PBO+MTX at Weeks 12 (Table 2) and 24 (not shown).

Conclusion: While the patient perspective is important, when PGA is not available, the DAS28-CRP3 score is able to provide an assessment of disease activity which correlates highly with the DAS28-CRP4 version.

Table 1. Patients who achieved DAS28-CRP <2.6 or LDA by the 3-component or 4-component versions at Weeks 12 and 24

Week 12

Week 24

Patients with DAS3 <2.6

Patients with DAS3<2.6 but not DAS4 <2.6

Patients with DAS3 <2.6

Patients with DAS3<2.6 but not DAS4 <2.6

PBO + MTX

69

8/69 (11.6)

127

4/127 (3.1)

ADA 40 mg + MTX

193

14/193 (7.3)

248

10/248 (4.0)

Patients with DAS3 LDA

Patients in DAS3 but not DAS4 LDA

Patients with DAS3 LDA

Patients in DAS3 but not DAS4 LDA

PBO + MTX

148

13/148 (8.8)

213

14/213 (6.6)

ADA 40 mg + MTX

346

19/346 (5.5)

424

16/424 (3.8)

Table 2. Change from Baseline measured by the 3-component (ΔDAS3) or 4-component (ΔDAS4) versions of the score at Week 12

ΔDAS3

treatment difference

ΔDAS4

treatment difference

PBO + MTX

-1.4

-0.7****

-1.6

-0.8****

ADA 40 mg + MTX

-2.1

-2.4

LDA response rate measured by the 3-component (DAS3) or 4-component (DAS4) versions at Week 12

DAS3

response rate difference

DAS4

response rate difference

PBO + MTX

15.3

19.7****

16.4

19.8****

ADA 40 mg + MTX

34.9

36.3

DAS28-CRP <2.6 response rate measured by the 3-component (DAS3) or 4-component (DAS4) versions at Week 12

DAS3

response rate difference

DAS4

response rate difference

PBO + MTX

7.1

12.4****

7.8

14.1****

ADA 40 mg + MTX

19.5

21.9

**** p<0.001

Disclosure: F. Breedveld, Centocor, Schering-Plough, Amgen/Wyeth, and AbbVie Inc, 5; X. Wang, AbbVie, 1,AbbVie, 3; A. Cardoso, AbbVie, 1,AbbVie, 3; E. Keystone, AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Janssen, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB, 2,AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Janssen, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB, 5,AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Janssen, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB, 8.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Breedveld F, Wang X, Cardoso A, Keystone E. The Relative Performance of 28-Joint Disease Activity Score Based on C-Reactive Protein with Three Versus Four Components in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-relative-performance-of-28-joint-disease-activity-score-based-on-c-reactive-protein-with-three-versus-four-components-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-relative-performance-of-28-joint-disease-activity-score-based-on-c-reactive-protein-with-three-versus-four-components-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology