ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 361

The Effect of Immunosuppressive and Antiresorptive Therapy on Bone Mineral Density in Lung Transplant Patients

Mireia Barceló-Bru1, Sandra Farietta-Varela2, Basilio Rodriguez-Díez1, Mireia López-Corbeto2, Ernesto Trallero-Araguás1, Juan Jose De Agustin De Oro2, Roxana Coras2 and Agusti Sellas-Fernandez2, 1Rheumatology, Hospital Universitario Vall d´Hebron, Barcelona, Spain, 2Hospital Universitario Vall d´Hebron, Barcelona, Spain

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: osteoporosis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2016

Title: Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone Disease – Clinical Aspects and Pathogenesis - Poster

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Osteoporosis is a very frequent complication in recipients of a lung transplant . The factors that intervene can be previous to the transplant, such as the individual risk, the underlying disease, the treatments received but also the ones related to the lung transplant, like the prolonged post-surgery immobilization. The rate of bone mass loss in the lumbar spine and the femoral neck in the first year is around 2-5% and fracture prevalence is between 18-37%. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effect of antiresorptive, glucocorticosteroids and other immunosuppressive treatments on bone mineral density in lung transplant patients.

Methods: This is a retrospective study on a cohort of 179 patients who were submitted to lung transplant between 2004 and 2014 in the Vall d’Hebron University Hospital. A bone densitometry was practiced to all patients before and after the lung transplant. The comparison between the determinations was made by calculating the percentage of change in bone mass expressed in g/cm2 at each of the explored region: the lumbar spine (L2-L4), the femoral neck and the total femur. For the analysis of the effect of immunosuppressant therapy on bone mineral mass, a subgroup of 136 patients was selected, who were receiving a standard treatment regimen: glucocorticosteroids, tacrolimus and mycophenolate. 3 groups were established, depending on the moment of the densitometry realization: in the first 6 months, between 6 and 12 months and more than 12 months after the lung transplant. The correlation between bone mineral loss in the regions of interest and the accumulated dose of each of the treatments was evaluated using logistic regression and multivariate analysis.

Results: Out of the 179 patients, 121 received treatment for osteoporosis after the lung transplant (89 were previously receiving it). Table 1 shows the number of treated patients as well as the received treatments. The average time (rank) between the start of the treatment and the realization of the bone densitometry post-transplant was of 24 months (5-120).

Table 1. Osteoporosis treatment after post-transplant
Treated (n=121) Not Treated (n=58) p
Osteopenia 61 (50.4) 26 (44.8) 0.272
Osteoporosis 46 (38) 23 (29.7) 0.480
Normal 14 (11.6) 9 (15.5)
Drug type
Oral byphosphonate 64 (52.9)
Intravenous byphosphonate 46 (38)
Strontium ranelate 2 (1.7)
Teriparatide 1 (1.7)
Calcitonin 1 (0.8)
Denosumab  3 (2.5)

Among the 136 patients (58.8% men) who were selected for the study of the effect of immunosuppressants on bone mineral mass, 49 (36%) had been diagnosed of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, 64 (47%) of Interstitial Lung Disease and 23 (17%) of other pulmonary diseases. The average percentage of variation of the bone mineral mass in all 136 patients was of +1.3% in lumbar spine, -3.4% in femoral neck and -2.3% in total femur. The percentage of variation of bone mineral mass pre and post-transplant in the treated patients was of 2.8% for the lumbar spine, -0.5% for the femoral neck and -1.3% for the total femur, in comparison to the group of untreated patients where the variation was of -2.5, -5.4% and -3.9, respectively. There was no significant difference in the average accumulated dose of glucocorticosteroids and immunosuppressants between patients whose post-transplant bone mineral mass improved or worsened, in none of the studied regions, nor in the global study or in either of the subgroups of studied diseases. In the multivariate analysis, feminine sex was the only variable which was associated to bone mineral loss in all the studied regions, except for the femoral neck.

Conclusion: The patients who received antiresorptive treatment pre transplant have a major increment of bone mineral mass at the lumbar spine and a lower post-transplant bone mineral mass loss than the not treated ones. No association was observed between glucocorticosteroid and other immunosuppressants and post-transplant bone mineral mass.


Disclosure: M. Barceló-Bru, None; S. Farietta-Varela, None; B. Rodriguez-Díez, None; M. López-Corbeto, None; E. Trallero-Araguás, None; J. J. De Agustin De Oro, None; R. Coras, None; A. Sellas-Fernandez, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Barceló-Bru M, Farietta-Varela S, Rodriguez-Díez B, López-Corbeto M, Trallero-Araguás E, De Agustin De Oro JJ, Coras R, Sellas-Fernandez A. The Effect of Immunosuppressive and Antiresorptive Therapy on Bone Mineral Density in Lung Transplant Patients [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-effect-of-immunosuppressive-and-antiresorptive-therapy-on-bone-mineral-density-in-lung-transplant-patients/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-effect-of-immunosuppressive-and-antiresorptive-therapy-on-bone-mineral-density-in-lung-transplant-patients/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology