ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 3210

Evaluation of Sacroiliac Joint Radiographs in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain: Is Erosion the Main Driver of Interreader Disagreement?

Alice Ashouri Christiansen1,2, Oliver Hendricks1,2, Dorota Kuettel1, Kim Hørslev-Petersen1,2, Anne Grethe Jurik2,3,4, Steen Nielsen1, Kaspar Rufibach5, Anne Gitte Loft6,7, Susanne Juhl Pedersen8,9, Louise Thuesen Hermansen1,2, Mikkel Østergaard8,10, Bodil Arnbak2,4, Claus Manniche2,4 and Ulrich Weber1,2, 1Department of Research, King Christian 10th Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Graasten, Denmark, 2Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark, 3Department of Radiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark, 4Hospital Lillebaelt, Spine Centre of Southern Denmark, Middelfart, Denmark, 5rePROstat, Basel, Switzerland, 6Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark, 7Department of Rheumatology, Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Denmark, 8Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark, 9Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Copenhagen, Denmark, 10Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet - Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: classification criteria, radiography, spondylarthritis and spondylarthropathy

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Title: Spondylarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis - Clinical Aspects and Treatment: Clinical Aspects, Imaging and Biomarkers

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose: Evaluation of sacroiliac joints (SIJ) on pelvic radiographs according to the modified New York criteria (mNYc) is considered the gold standard for classification of axial spondyloarthritis (SpA). However, agreement among trained readers was consistently limited with kappa values around 0.5 [1-4]. The goals of this study in chronic back pain patients suspected of having SpA were: to determine the reproducibility of radiographic SIJ evaluation among 7 readers with varying levels of experience; to identify potential drivers to disagreement in classification among 5 predefined radiographic lesion types.

Methods: The study sample comprised 104 (38% male) consecutive patients aged 18-40 years with low back pain ≥3 months’ duration, who met the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) definition for a positive SIJ MRI (n=92) or were HLA B27 positive (n=12) and had ≥1 SpA related clinical/laboratory feature according to the ASAS classification criteria for axial SpA. All readers (2 musculoskeletal (MSK) radiologists; 2 junior and 3 senior rheumatologists) were calibrated by reference images covering all mNYc grades. The rheumatologists additionally had 3 training sessions comprising independent evaluation of unrelated pelvic radiographs. 7 blinded readers classified pelvic radiographs according to the mNYc and then recorded 5 lesion types in both SIJ: erosion, sclerosis, ankylosis, joint space widening and narrowing. Reproducibility of the mNYc classification among 21 reader pairs was assessed by Cohen’s kappas and percent agreement. Potential drivers of disagreement were identified as proportions of concordant lesion types among patients with discordant classification. Finally, a generalized linear mixed logistic regression model was computed to explore to which extent discordance in lesion type was associated to discrepant mNYc classification.

Results: Kappas (percent concordance) for classification by mNYc were: 0.39 over 7 readers; 0.46 (79.8%) between 2 MSK radiologists; 0.55 (86.5%) and 0.36 (77.9%) among the most experienced rheumatologist and the 2 MSK radiologists.

Figure 1 Proportion of concordant lesion types among patients with discordant classification among 21 reader pairs

Table 1 Odds ratio for disagreement in classification in relation to lesion type among 21 reader pairs

Discordance in lesion type

Odds ratio for disagreement in mNYc

95% confidence interval

P-value

Erosion

13.5

9.1 to 20.1

<0.0001

Sclerosis

0.9

0.6 to 1.3

0.49

Ankylosis

4.8

2.7 to 8.3

<0.0001

Joint space widening

5.6

3.4 to 9.2

<0.0001

Joint space narrowing

3.0

2.0 to 4.6

<0.0001

Conclusion: Reproducibility of SIJ classification by mNYc was fair to moderate among 7 readers with varying experience in assessing pelvic X-rays. Erosion was the main driver of discordant classification.

References: ARD 1987;46:139. ARD 2003;62:519. A&R 2012;64:1412. A&R 2014;66:2403.


Disclosure: A. Ashouri Christiansen, None; O. Hendricks, None; D. Kuettel, None; K. Hørslev-Petersen, None; A. G. Jurik, None; S. Nielsen, None; K. Rufibach, None; A. G. Loft, None; S. Juhl Pedersen, None; L. Thuesen Hermansen, None; M. Østergaard, None; B. Arnbak, None; C. Manniche, None; U. Weber, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Ashouri Christiansen A, Hendricks O, Kuettel D, Hørslev-Petersen K, Jurik AG, Nielsen S, Rufibach K, Loft AG, Juhl Pedersen S, Thuesen Hermansen L, Østergaard M, Arnbak B, Manniche C, Weber U. Evaluation of Sacroiliac Joint Radiographs in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain: Is Erosion the Main Driver of Interreader Disagreement? [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/evaluation-of-sacroiliac-joint-radiographs-in-patients-with-chronic-low-back-pain-is-erosion-the-main-driver-of-interreader-disagreement/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/evaluation-of-sacroiliac-joint-radiographs-in-patients-with-chronic-low-back-pain-is-erosion-the-main-driver-of-interreader-disagreement/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology