ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 3057

Can We Differentiate Takayasu’s Arteritis from Atherosclerosis Using Carotid Artery Doppler Usg?

Serdal Ugurlu1, Fatma Ela keskin2, Firat Cetinkaya3, Melike Melikoglu1, Vedat Hamuryudan4, Izzet Fresko4, Pinar Kadioglu2 and Emire Seyahi4, 1Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, University of Istanbul, Turkey, Istanbul, Turkey, 2Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, University of Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey, 3Colormed Radiology Center, Istanbul, Turkey, 4Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, University of Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Atherosclerosis, diabetes and takayasu arteritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Title: Vasculitis Poster III

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Clinicians can have
difficulty in making differential diagnosis between Takayasu and
atherosclerosis. This is especially true when laboratory evaluations and FDG
PET are inconclusive. In addition o that atherosclerosis load is potentially
increased in TA because of the intense vascular inflammation. About 1/3rd of
the patients with TA had carotid artery plaques and almost half diffuse aortic
calcifications.

We thought that TA might have
unique vascular changes distinct from atherosclerosis when evaluated with
Doppler ultrasonography (USG). Thus, in this study we investigated the
morphologic and hemodynamic changes in the carotid arteries in TA, along with
patients with diabetes mellitus and healthy controls.

Methods:

Consecutive patients with TA seen
in the department of Rheumatology at Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty were studied. Healthy
controls were also included. TA patients and healthy controls were aged between
18 and 50 years. Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) who were followed by the
endocrinology outpatient clinic were also studied. For the purposes of this
study, no age limit was set for patients with DM. Only females were studied.
Traditional atherosclerotic risk factors were also assessed.

The radiologist scanned the right
and left common, internal and external carotids and carotid bulb with the help of Doppler
USG.  Intima media thickness (IMT) was measured and resistivity index was
calculated. The presence of atherosclerotic plaques, turbulence and macaroni
sign was assessed. Macaroni sign was defined as diffuse homogenous IMT
thickening of at least 0.9 mm.   

Results:

We studied 58
patients with TA (mean age: 43 ±11), 42 patients with DM (mean age: 57 ± 9) and
24 healthy controls (mean age: 41 ± 4).  Atherosclerotic risk factors are
summarized in Table 1 and carotid artery Doppler findings in Table 2. Patients
with DM were significantly older and had significantly more atherosclerotic
risk factors compared to patients with TA. Only smoking was significantly more
frequent among healthy controls.  

Patients with DM had
more plaques and had higher IMT when compared to patients with TA, however,
macaroni sign and turbulence were observed almost only among patients with TA.
Finally the mean resistivity index was only significantly increased in TA.

Conclusion:

This study showed
that carotid artery USG may be helpful in differentiating TA from
atherosclerosis. Diffuse homogenous increase in IMT, presence of turbulence and
higher resistivity index can be considered as suggestive of  TA rather than
atherosclerosis.   

 

 

Table 1. Atherosclerotic
risk factors

 

Takayasu arteritis

n= 58

Diabetes Mellitus

n= 42

Healthy controls

n= 24

P

BMI

25.6 ± 4.4

30.8 ± 5.8

26.7 ± 4.9

<0.001

Smoking, n (%)

12 (22)

11 (28)

16 (76)

<0.001

Diabetes mellitus, n (%)

4 (8)

42 (100)

0

< 0.001

Hypertension, n (%)

31 (56)

30 (77)

1 (5)

< 0.001

Familial history of ischemic heart disease, n (%)

22 (41)

16 (40)

8 (38)

0.978

Post-menauposal status, n (%)

23 (42)

36 (92)

1 (5)

<0.001

 

Table 2. Morphologic
and hemodynamic findings in the carotid artery USG

 

Takayasu arteritis

n= 58

Diabetes Mellitus

n= 42

Healthy controls

n= 24

P

Macaroni sign, n (%)

45 (78)

1 (2)

0

<0.001

Atherosclerotic  plaques, n (%)

21 (36)

28 (67)

2 (8)

<0.001

Turbulence, n (%)

8 (14)

0

0

0.008

Intima-media thickness, mm

0.90 ±0.36

0.96 ± 0.25

0.40 ± 0.12

<0.001

Resistivity index

0.63 ± 0.10

0.50 ± 0.04

0.56 ± 0.04

<0.001

 


Disclosure: S. Ugurlu, None; F. E. keskin, None; F. Cetinkaya, None; M. Melikoglu, None; V. Hamuryudan, None; I. Fresko, None; P. Kadioglu, None; E. Seyahi, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Ugurlu S, keskin FE, Cetinkaya F, Melikoglu M, Hamuryudan V, Fresko I, Kadioglu P, Seyahi E. Can We Differentiate Takayasu’s Arteritis from Atherosclerosis Using Carotid Artery Doppler Usg? [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/can-we-differentiate-takayasus-arteritis-from-atherosclerosis-using-carotid-artery-doppler-usg/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/can-we-differentiate-takayasus-arteritis-from-atherosclerosis-using-carotid-artery-doppler-usg/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology