ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2953

The Emergency Room and SLE: What Characteristics Are Associated with Increased Emergency Room Utilization in Lupus Patients?

Kimberly Trotter1, Kichul Ko1, Gabrielle Liu1 and Tammy Utset2, 1Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 2University of Chicago, Chicago, IL

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus - Clinical Aspects and Treatment Poster Session III

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:
There is sparse data examining the characteristics of SLE patients who frequent
the emergency room (ER). Data suggest that lupus patients with certain sociodemographic
risk factors and possibly lack of access to preventive care are more likely to
go to the ER. We sought to explore which characteristics were associated with
ER utilization in our lupus cohort.

Methods: 125 patients
fulfilling the ACR criteria for SLE were recruited during routine ambulatory
visits between November 2013 and December 2014. Demographics, disease duration,
preventive care, healthcare utilization, reason for ER visit, who referred the patient
to the ER, disposition, and prevention of ER visits were elicited via a patient
reported questionnaire. Patients also completed the Medication Adherence Self-Report
Inventory (MASRI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, Short Form 36 Health
Survey (SF-36), Beck depression Inventory, and Interpersonal Support Evaluation
List (ISEL).  We compared patients with no ER visits versus ≥ 1 ER visit
in the past year. Categorical variables were evaluated using chi-square while
continuous variables were evaluated using two-tailed Student’s unpaired t-test,
Wilcoxon rank-sum test, or logistic regression analysis. 

Results: Patients with
≥ 1 ER visit were more likely to be younger, non-Caucasian, single, non-college
graduates, and have Medicaid.  ER utilizers also had higher pain scores, worse
overall mental and physical health, and increased depression. Patients who
utilized the ER were also less likely to have ever had a lipid panel (Table 1).
There was no difference in frequency of PCP or rheumatology appointments, mammograms,
flu shots, pap smears.  In a multivariate analysis, only younger age was found
to be associated with ≥ 1 ER visit.

In regards to characteristics associated with each ER
visit, 57.3% of patients went to the ER due to lupus. 73% of patients self-directed
themselves to the ER and felt nothing could have prevented the ER visit. Only 23.4%
of these ER visits actually resulted in admission. The majority of ER visits
were reportedly due to pain/arthritis (26.5%) and cardiopulmonary complaints
(20.5%).

Conclusion: Frequent
ER utilization was shown to be associated with certain sociodemographic
features and worse self-reported outcomes. Studies from the general population
have also found an association with frequent ER use and poor access to medical
care. Conversely, our data showed that access to primary care, rheumatology,
and preventive services was equivalent between the two groups. This suggests
that access to care may not be associated with ER utilization in the SLE
population.  Lastly, given the majority of patients self-directed
themselves to the ER and were not admitted to the hospital, we need to educate
them to call their physician first to determine the utility of an ER evaluation.

Table 1

Characteristics of study population by ER Visits

Variables

No ER Visits (n=53)

Any ER Visits (n=56)

P Value

Percent of total sample

48.6 %

51.4 %

 

Demographics

 

 

 

Age, mean (standard deviation)(SD)

47.3 (10.3)

40.5 (11.9)

0.002

Race/Ethnicity

 

 

0.007

     Caucasian, %

43%

20%

 

     Non- Caucasian, %

57%

80%

 

Education, %

 

 

0.04

     < College degree

39.6%

58.9%

 

     ≥ College degree

60.4%

41.1%

 

Employed, %

53%

48%

0.63

Married, %

62%

35%

0.006

Insurance, %

 

 

 

      Private

54.7%

40%

 

      Medicare

24.5

36.4%

0.01

      Medicaid

5.7%

21.8%

 

      Health Maintenance    

      Organization (HMO)

13.2%

1.8%

 

      Other (self-pay)

1.9%

0%

 

Disease characteristics

 

 

 

Disease duration, mean years (SD)

14.5 (9.5)

11.7 (10.4)

0.06

MASRI, mean score (SD)

9 (1.4)

8.9 (1.8)

0.55

VAS, pain, mean score (SD)

4 (2.8)

5.7 (2.8)

0.003

SF-36, mental mean score (SD)

47.6 (11)

42 (10.8)

0.01

SF-36, physical mean score (SD)

40.4 (10.4)

34.9 (10.6)

0.007

ISEL, mean score (SD)

93.3 (16.2)

85.4 (21)

0.06

Becks, mean score (SD)

8.6 (7.8)

14.5 (9)

0.0006

Primary Care Physician (PCP), %

87%

91%

0.48

PCP visits, mean (SD)

2.6 (2.6)

3 (2.7)

0.3

Rheumatology visits, mean (SD)

2.9 (1.2)

3.6 (2.1)

0.18

Frequency missed PCP visits,  %

 

 

0.18

              0

50.6%

49.4%

 

            ≥1

33.3%

66.7%

 

Missed Rheumatology visits, %

 

 

0.6

              0

49.3%

50.7%

 

           ≥ 1

43.3%

56.7%

 

Preventive Care

 

 

 

Lipids ever, %

83%

66%

0.04

Lipids last 5 years, %

76%

67%

0.34

Flu shot, %

69%

62%

0.46

Pap smear, (q3/q1 years) %

28/54%

28/59%

0.85

Mammogram (yearly), %

67%

46%

0.19

 


Disclosure: K. Trotter, None; K. Ko, None; G. Liu, None; T. Utset, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Trotter K, Ko K, Liu G, Utset T. The Emergency Room and SLE: What Characteristics Are Associated with Increased Emergency Room Utilization in Lupus Patients? [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-emergency-room-and-sle-what-characteristics-are-associated-with-increased-emergency-room-utilization-in-lupus-patients/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-emergency-room-and-sle-what-characteristics-are-associated-with-increased-emergency-room-utilization-in-lupus-patients/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology