ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2876

Baseline Demographic and Disease Characteristics Associated with Response to Golimumab in Patients with Active Nonradiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis

Maxime Dougados1, Gina Bergman2, Walter Maksymowych3, Sean P. Curtis2, Susan Huyck2, Anjela Tzontcheva2 and Joachim Sieper4, 1Paris-Descartes University, Paris, France, 2Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, 3University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 4University Clinic Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: anti-TNF therapy, axial spondyloarthritis, non-radiographic, randomized trials and spondylarthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Title: Spondylarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis - Clinical Aspects and Treatment Poster III: Therapy

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:  Subgroup analyses can be used to investigate the size and direction of treatment effects across a range of demographic and disease characteristics. The purpose of this study was to explore response consistency in subgroups of patients with nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) who received golimumab (GLM) or placebo for 16 wks.

Methods: GO-AHEAD was a double-blind, randomized, placebo (PBO)-controlled trial of GLM in patients with active nr-axSpA (ASAS criteria and centrally read sacroiliac (SI) joint X-rays and MRIs; disease duration ≤5 years; chronic back pain; high disease activity [total back pain ≥40 mm on a 0–100 mm Visual Analogue Scale and BASDAI ≥4 cm]; and inadequate response/intolerance to NSAIDs). Patients were randomized 1:1 to subcutaneous GLM 50 mg or PBO every 4 wks. Estimated between-group treatment differences and 95% CIs for ASAS 20 and ASAS 40 response at wk 16 were calculated for prespecified patient subgroups. Treatment and subgroup differences were compared by stratified Miettinen–Nurminen methods with baseline inflammation by SI joint MRI and screening C-reactive protein (CRP) level as stratification factors. No multiplicity control was applied.

Results:  A total of 197 patients were treated (GLM=97; PBO=100). Overall, ASAS 20 at wk 16 was achieved by 71.1% of GLM patients and 40.0% of PBO patients (P <.0001). Although size of response differed somewhat across the subgroups, responses were greater to GLM than PBO in most patient subgroups (P<.05; Table). Because of the small numbers of patients within subgroups and because subgroups may not represent randomized samples, results should be considered exploratory and interpreted with caution. Treatment group differences appeared to be larger in patients with objective signs of inflammation (MRI SI or CRP>ULN). The results for ASAS 40 were very similar to those for ASAS 20.

Table. ASAS 20 Attainment at Week 16 by Treatment Group and Baseline Characteristics

Subgroup

GLM

n/N (%)

PBO

n/N (%)

Difference vs PBOa

% (95% CI)

Gender

 

 

 

  Female

21/36 (58.3)

20/48 (41.7)

14.8 (–6.9, 35.4)

  Male

48/61 (78.7)

20/52 (38.5)

40.0 (21.8, 55.6)

Age

 

 

 

  ≤30 years

41/56 (73.2)

16/45 (35.6)

39.6 (20.4, 56.0)

  >30 years

28/41 (68.3)

24/55 (43.6)

26.1 (5.6, 43.7)

Disease duration

 

 

 

  >median

38/48 (79.2)

18/51 (35.3)

43.3 (24.1, 59.3)

  ≤median

31/49 (63.3)

22/49 (44.9)

18.2 (–1.4, 36.3)

HLA-B27

 

 

 

  Negative

8/16 (50.0)

7/18 (38.9)

11.1 (–23.3, 43.5)

  Positive

61/81 (75.3)

33/82 (40.2)

35.0 (20.2, 48.2)

MRI sacroiliitis

 

 

 

  Yes

48/65 (73.8)

25/66 (37.9)

36.0 (19.3, 50.7)

  No

21/32 (65.6)

15/34 (44.1)

21.6 (–2.6, 43.0)

CRP

 

 

 

  ≤ULN

35/58 (60.3)

25/59 (42.4)

17.9 (–0.3, 35.0)

  >ULN

34/39 (87.2)

15/41 (36.6)

50.6 (30.5, 66.6)

MRI sacroiliitis (+) or CRP >ULN

60/78 (76.9)

30/80 (37.5)

39.6 (24.6, 52.6)

MRI sacroiliitis (–) and CRP ≤ULN

9/19 (47.4)

10/20 (50.0)

–2.6 (–32.7, 27.9)

aDifferences derived from the statistical model.

Conclusion:  Overall, patients with active nr-axSpA who received GLM were more likely to achieve ASAS 20 at wk 16 than those treated with PBO across a variety of baseline characteristics, including those with baseline objective signs of inflammation (eg, MRI SI or CRP >ULN).


Disclosure: M. Dougados, AbbVie, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, UCB, 2; G. Bergman, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA, 3,Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA, 1; W. Maksymowych, AbbVie, Janssen, Pfizer, 2,AbbVie, UCB, Pfizer, Merck, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Celgene, Synarc, 5; S. P. Curtis, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA, 3,Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA, 1; S. Huyck, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA, 3,Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA, 1; A. Tzontcheva, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA, 3,Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA, 1; J. Sieper, AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssen Biologics, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, UCB, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Dougados M, Bergman G, Maksymowych W, Curtis SP, Huyck S, Tzontcheva A, Sieper J. Baseline Demographic and Disease Characteristics Associated with Response to Golimumab in Patients with Active Nonradiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/baseline-demographic-and-disease-characteristics-associated-with-response-to-golimumab-in-patients-with-active-nonradiographic-axial-spondyloarthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/baseline-demographic-and-disease-characteristics-associated-with-response-to-golimumab-in-patients-with-active-nonradiographic-axial-spondyloarthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology