ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2498

Barriers to Appointment Compliance and the Effect of Reminder Phone Calls on Lupus Clinic Show Rate in an Underserved Community

Anand Kumthekar1 and Beverly Johnson2, 1Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Jacobi Medical Center, Bronx, NY, 2Jacobi Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Compliance, Lupus and clinical practice

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Title: Quality Measures and Quality of Care Poster Session

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Appointment compliance is a nationwide problem with a higher prevalence in the underserved communities. For physicians it results in lost time, decreased efficiency, and for patients it results in dissatisfaction and reduced quality of care. The primary objective of this study was to identify major barriers to appointment compliance in an underserved lupus clinic. A secondary objective was to assess appointment compliance after an intervention involving reminder phone calls.

Methods:

We retrospectively assessed the clinic show rate at our lupus clinic serving a low income population with primarily Medicare/Medicaid or no insurance from November, 2013 to July, 2014. Appointment attendance was confirmed by using electronic medical records (EMR). A survey was designed based on the perceived barriers for appointment compliance from literature review, was piloted and then administered from July 1st,2014 to August 31st,2014. An intervention involving reminder telephone calls 1-3 days prior to the visit was implemented from September 1st,2014-April 30th,2015. IRB exemption was received for this study.

Results:

We collected survey results from 43 patients. The most common reason mentioned for missed appointments was forgetting the appointment date (46.5%). 13% responded that the appointment was cancelled by the clinic and 13% said they had family issues. 12% mentioned they did not have adequate child care and 11% said they did not receive an appointment before they left the clinic. Before the intervention, 352 lupus clinic appointments were analyzed with an average show rate of 58.8%. After the telephone reminder, we analyzed 378 patient visits with a show rate of 74.86%. Using Pearson’s chi square test, the improvement in clinic show rate was statistically significant (p=0.046).

Study Period

Appointments Scheduled

Clinic Show Rate

Pre-Intervention

352

207 (58.8%)

Post-Intervention

378

283 (74.86%)

Conclusion:

Our study identifies barriers to care from the patient perspective in an underserved community. Limitations include the retrospective nature of the study and the pre and post intervention states were studied at different times of the year. Our data suggests that reminder phone calls significantly improves clinic show rates, which improves quality of care. In a multidisciplinary specialized lupus clinic serving a low income population we found that clinic show rate is related to lack of appointment reminders. Reminder phone calls are a low cost intervention with the potential for significant benefit and should be considered in similar low income lupus clinics.


Disclosure: A. Kumthekar, None; B. Johnson, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Kumthekar A, Johnson B. Barriers to Appointment Compliance and the Effect of Reminder Phone Calls on Lupus Clinic Show Rate in an Underserved Community [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/barriers-to-appointment-compliance-and-the-effect-of-reminder-phone-calls-on-lupus-clinic-show-rate-in-an-underserved-community/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/barriers-to-appointment-compliance-and-the-effect-of-reminder-phone-calls-on-lupus-clinic-show-rate-in-an-underserved-community/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology