ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2493

Improvement of Disease Activity and Quality of Care in a Cohort of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Treated with Conventional Dmard Therapy Under Treat to Target Recommendations and a Model of Patient-Centered Care

Pedro Ivan Santos-Moreno1, Ginna Saavedra2, Rosana Ramirez2, Laura Villarreal2, Ana Bolena Cardozo2, Vanessa Giraldo2, Paola Martinez2, Adriana Sanchez2, Merle Sanchez2, Danny Gomez2 and Juan Manuel Bello2, 1Rheumatology, Biomab, Center for Rheumatoid Arthritis., Bogota, Colombia, 2Rheumatology, Biomab, Center for Rheumatoid Arthritis, Bogota, Colombia, Bogota, Colombia

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Disease Activity, patient outcomes, Quality of care and rheumatoid arthritis, treatment

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Title: Quality Measures and Quality of Care Poster Session

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Treat to Target (T2T) strategy becomes from the need to develop therapeutic targets and tools to achieve defined outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Moreover, models of patient-centered care where multidisciplinary teams make disease management increasingly take place in rheumatology. The aim of this study was to describe change in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) using T2T strategy for a 24-month period in patients with conventional DMARD therapy in a large cohort of patients from a specialized in RA center where a model of patient-centered management is used.

Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was performed. Records of patients in conventional DMARD therapy from specialized in RA center were reviewed; those patients were followed-up under T2T standards. Clinical follow-up was done strictly according to DAS28 as follows: every 3-5 weeks (DAS28 > 5.1), every 7-9 weeks (DAS28 ≥ 3.1 and ≤ 5.1), and every 11-13 weeks (DAS28 < 3.1). Tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), DAS28 and HAQ were measured on each visit. Therapy had to be adjusted with DAS28 > 3.2 unless patient´s conditions don’t permit it; we considered this follow-up type as implementation of a T2T strategy in patients with RA. We divided patients in four groups: remission (Rem), low disease activity (LDA), moderate disease activity (MDA) and high disease activity (HDA) patients and the aim of the study was to look at what percentage of patients who were in moderate or high disease activity reached a low disease activity or remission after 24-month period. On the other hand, patients were followed-up by physiatrist, psychologist, nutritionist and therapists at least 3 times a year. Descriptive epidemiology was done, percentages and averages were calculated; the median of each variable was analyzed using t-Student assuming normality for DAS28 distribution and the level disease activity was analyzed using Pearson´s statistics. 

Results: 1110 patients were included in this study, 826 (74.4%) women and 284 (25.5%) men. Average age was 61 y/o (15-89) with disease duration of 11 years (0.5-47). Concerning to treatment of entire cohort 76 (6.8%) patients were using Leflunomide alone, 114 (10.2%) Metothrexate alone, 100 (9.0%) Leflunomide plus Metothrexate, 98 (8.8%) Leflunomide plus other DMARDs, 519 (46,7%) Metothrexate plus others DMARDs and 203 (16.9%) “only” DMARDs without Leflunomide or Metothrexate. At 24 months 66.6% of patients got remission and 13% LDA and was observed a decrease in percentage of patients in MDA/HDA statistically significant. For the entire cohort, at beginning DAS28 was 3.6 and after 24 months of follow-up DAS28 was 2.6 showing improvement (p <0.00). In overall, 98% of patients rated the quality and accessibility of multi-disciplinary care as good or excellent. 

Conclusion: There is a great improvement of DAS28 in a cohort of RA patients only receiving conventional therapy with following-up under strict T2T strategy. This is very important issue in those countries or environments with limited resources for health care. Regarding a model of patient-centered care, studies are needed to measure the impact of the multidisciplinary team on the clinical results obtained.


Disclosure: P. I. Santos-Moreno, None; G. Saavedra, None; R. Ramirez, None; L. Villarreal, None; A. B. Cardozo, None; V. Giraldo, None; P. Martinez, None; A. Sanchez, None; M. Sanchez, None; D. Gomez, None; J. M. Bello, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Santos-Moreno PI, Saavedra G, Ramirez R, Villarreal L, Cardozo AB, Giraldo V, Martinez P, Sanchez A, Sanchez M, Gomez D, Bello JM. Improvement of Disease Activity and Quality of Care in a Cohort of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Treated with Conventional Dmard Therapy Under Treat to Target Recommendations and a Model of Patient-Centered Care [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/improvement-of-disease-activity-and-quality-of-care-in-a-cohort-of-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-treated-with-conventional-dmard-therapy-under-treat-to-target-recommendations-and-a-model-of-patient-ce/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/improvement-of-disease-activity-and-quality-of-care-in-a-cohort-of-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-treated-with-conventional-dmard-therapy-under-treat-to-target-recommendations-and-a-model-of-patient-ce/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology