ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2165

Awareness and Reasons for Lack of Post-Fracture Osteoporosis Therapy: A Survey of Post-Menopausal Women

Denise Boudreau1, Onchee Yu1, Akhila Balasubramanian2, Jane Grafton1, Heidi Wirtz3, Andreas Grauer3, D. Barry Crittenden3 and Delia Scholes1, 1Group Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, 2Center for Observational Research, Amgen, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, 3Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: fractures, medication, osteoporosis, patient engagement and treatment

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2015

Title: ACR/ARHP Combined Abstract Session: Epidemiology and Pubic Health

Session Type: ACR/ARHP Combined Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose: Osteoporotic fractures cause patient morbidity and increase risk for future fracture. Effective drug therapies for osteoporosis (OP) are available, yet only a minority of women receives osteoporosis pharmacotherapy (OP-Rx) post-fracture. Reasons for lack of post-fracture OP-Rx are not well understood. We undertook the first large scale survey of women with recent osteoporotic fractures to characterize their beliefs about OP and their physician interactions, and to understand the factors associated with lack of post-fracture OP-Rx.

Methods: A survey was mailed to 985 women, aged >55 years with an osteoporotic fracture in 2013-2014, who were enrollees of Group Health Cooperative, a large Northwest health plan. Receipt of OP-Rx in the 6 months post-fracture was determined from automated pharmacy data. The associations between factors of interest and non-receipt of post-fracture OP-Rx were assessed using age-adjusted modified Poisson regression with a robust sandwich estimator.

Results: 634 women returned the survey (73% response rate, excluding 119 ineligibles); mean age was 75 years (SD 11.1) and 77% were white. Primary fracture sites were distal forearm (31%), hip (27%), spine (14%), and humerus (18%). 84% of women did not receive OP-Rx within 6 months post fracture. Even among the 11% of women who were on OP-Rx prior to fracture, 40% did not continue therapy following the fracture. Only 20% of all respondents believed that OP-Rx reduces risk of fracture. Women who were not concerned about OP or future fractures, did not think OP caused their fracture, did not think OP-Rx was effective in reducing fractures, or did not believe a fracture put them at risk for future fracture were at increased risk for non-receipt of OP-Rx (Table). Similarly, women who did not discuss OP management or fracture prevention with their physicians, and whose primary source of information on OP was the media or family and friends rather than their medical providers were also at higher risk for not receiving OP-Rx.

Conclusion: The majority of women who suffered an OP fracture did not receive OP-Rx in the 6 months post-fracture. This study suggests that patient education about OP, the risk for future fracture after an initial fracture, and the potential benefits of therapy – through physician input or potentially other reliable sources – may help reverse the substantial under-treatment of women post-fracture.

Table.  Association between   patient perspectives and interactions with medical providers on non-receipt   of osteoporosis pharmacotherapy (OP-Rx) within 6 months of osteoporotic   fracture

 

Relative Risk1

95% CI

Patient self-reported   perspectives and beliefs on osteoporosis and fracture

Concerned about their future risk of   fractures

Not at all vs. very/somewhat

1.13

1.05-1.21

Concerned about osteoporosis

Not at all vs. very/somewhat

1.21

1.14-1.28

Believe a fracture puts them at risk for   future fractures

No vs. yes

1.17

1.09-1.25

Believe osteoporosis caused their fracture

No vs. yes

1.31

1.15-1.48

Believe OP-Rx reduces risk of fracture

No vs. yes

1.22

1.09-1.36

Believe harms of OP-Rx outweigh benefits

Yes vs. no

1.06

0.98-1.14

Interactions with   medical providers on osteoporosis and fractures

Primary source of information on   osteoporosis

Media vs. medical provider

Family/friends vs. medical provider

1.13

1.20

1.05-1.21

1.11-1.30

PCP aware of fracture

No vs. yes

1.08

1.00-1.17

Told had osteoporosis by provider

No vs. yes

1.25

1.16-1.36

Provider recommendation to prevent fractures   and/or manage osteoporosis

OP-Rx

Other (e.g. supplements, diet)

No recommendation

(ref)

1.89

1.85

1.61-2.21

1.57-2.19

Contact with PCP post fracture

No vs. yes

1.03

0.92-1.15

Discussed   preventing fractures

No vs. yes

1.13

1.04-1.24

Discussed   managing osteoporosis

No vs. yes

1.38

1.23-1.54

Osteoporosis   was among top 3 topics discussed at PCP visits

No vs. yes

1.34

1.21-1.49

Time spent   with PCP

Not enough vs. enough

0.92

0.78-1.08

Abbreviations: OP-Rx –osteoporosis pharmacotherapy; PCP – primary care provider

1 All risk estimates, except for age, are adjusted for age.


Disclosure: D. Boudreau, Amgen, 2; O. Yu, Amgen, 2; A. Balasubramanian, Amgen, 3,Amgen, 1; J. Grafton, Amgen, 2; H. Wirtz, Amgen, 1,Amgen, 3; A. Grauer, Amgen, 1,Amgen, 3; D. B. Crittenden, Amgen, 1,Amgen, 3; D. Scholes, Amgen, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Boudreau D, Yu O, Balasubramanian A, Grafton J, Wirtz H, Grauer A, Crittenden DB, Scholes D. Awareness and Reasons for Lack of Post-Fracture Osteoporosis Therapy: A Survey of Post-Menopausal Women [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/awareness-and-reasons-for-lack-of-post-fracture-osteoporosis-therapy-a-survey-of-post-menopausal-women/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/awareness-and-reasons-for-lack-of-post-fracture-osteoporosis-therapy-a-survey-of-post-menopausal-women/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology