ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2141

Risk of Cancer in Non-TNFi Biologics-Treated RA

Hjalmar Wadström1, Johan Askling2 and the ARTIS study group, 1Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden, 2Clinical Epidemiology Unit and Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Biologics, Malignancy, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and safety

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2015

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis-Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy IV: Safety of Targeted Therapies

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose:

Immune incompetence may lower host surveillance against incipient tumours. Conversely, immune therapies have emerged as a promising therapeutic approach to cancer. Malignancies thus constitute an important aspect of the safety of biologics as used in Rheumatology, including agents targeting TNF, CD20, CTLA-4, and IL6. Previous reports concerning TNF inhibitors (TNFi) and risk of malignancies have mostly been reassuring. The risk of malignancies among RA patients treated with non-TNFi biologics is less well-known.

Methods:

Through linkages of Swedish national and population-based registers we assembled three cohorts of patients with RA initiating a first ever treatment of: 1) rituximab, 2) abatacept, 3) tocilizumab, 4) any TNFi, and 5) a cohort initiating a second TNFi. Also, 6) a biologics-naïve RA cohort was assembled, and 7) a general population comparator cohort, matched 1:10 on the biologics-naïve RA cohort. Through linkage with the Cancer Register information on cancer events were gathered. Outcomes were defined as first solid invasive malignancy, first hematologic malignancy, first invasive squamous cell skin cancer, and first solid or hematologic malignancy, all defined as first during follow-up. Patients were followed from treatment start until death, emigration, outcome or end of follow up. Crude incidences, as well as age and sex standardized incidences were calculated for outcomes from 2006 through 2012. Hazard ratios were calculated using Cox-regression, adjusted for age and sex.

Results:

Adjusted for age and sex, there were no statistically significant differences, for any of the outcomes, between initiators of non-TNFi biologics and initiators of a first or second TNFi, although small number of events precluded formal comparisons in some of the analyses. 

Conclusion: The overall risk of malignancies among RA patients initiating rituximab, abatacept, or tocilizumab in clinical practice does not differ substantially from that of RA patients initiating a first or second TNF inhibitor, though risks for specific cancer sites or with longer latency cannot be excluded.

Table. Number of persons, events, crude incidence, standardized incidence, average follow-up time and hazard ratios for the different outcomes under study. 

Outcome definition

Cohort

Number of persons at risk

Number of events

Crude incidence per 100,000 pys 

Incidence rate standardized to the non-tnfi bio cohorts (by age and sex)

Mean follow-up, years

HR (adjusted for age and sex)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First invasive solid cancer

 1 rituximab

 2048

 62

 1028

 1013

 2.94

 1.05 (0.82-1.34)

 2 abatacept

 622

 12

 787

 832

 2.45

 0.86 (0.49-1.51)

 3 tocilizumab

 630

 13

 1186

 1302

 1.74

 1.33 (0.77-2.30)

 4 First TNFi

 7389

 189

 849

 977

 3.01

 1.03 (0.89-1.18)

 5 Second TNFi

 3120

 71

 858

 986

 2.65

 1.05 (0.83-1.33)

 6 Biologics-naïve RA

 43 523

 2181

 1212

 1033

 4.13

 1.07 (1.02-1.12)

 7 General population

 387 480

 20172

 1074

 960

 4.85

 REF

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First hematologic malignancy

 1 rituximab

 2048

 5

 82

 84

 2.98

 1.08 (0.45-2.60)

 2 abatacept

 622 

 4

 260

 258

 2.47

 NA

 3 tocilizumab

 630

 0

 0

 0

 1.76

 NA

 4 First TNFi

 7389

 21

 93

 99

 3.05

 1.51 (0.98-2.32)

 5 Second TNFi

 3120

 10

 120

 149

 2.68

 1.96 (1.05-3.65)

 6 Biologics-naïve RA 

 43 524

 275

 150

 124

 4.22

 1.58 (1.39-1.80)

 7 General population

 387 488

 1694

 88

 74

 4.95

 REF

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First invasive squamous cell skin cancer

 1 rituximab

 2048

 9

 147

 135

 2.98

 2.23 (1.16-4.29)

 2 abatacept

 622

 2

 130

 180

 2.48

 NA

 3 tocilizumab

 630

 1

 90

 90

 1.76

 NA

 4 First TNFi

 7389

 25

 111

 145

 3.05

 2.36 (1.59-3.50)

 5 Second TNFi

 3120

 5

 60

 72

 2.68

 1.27 (0.53-3.05)

 6 Biologics-naïve RA

 43526

 330

 180

 116

 4.22

 1.67 (1.48-1.88)

 7 General population

 387 485

 1819

 95 

 73

 4.95

 REF

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

First invasive solid or hematologic cancer

 1 rituximab

 2048

 66

 1096

 1086

 2.94

 1.04 (0.82-1.32)

 2 abatacept

 622

 16

 1052

 1096

 2.45

 1.07 (0.66-1.75)

 3 tocilizumab

 630

 13

 1186

 1309

 1.74

 1.25 (0.72-2.14)

 4 First TNFi

 7389

 208

 936

 1078

 3.01

 1.06 (0.92-1.21)

 5 Second TNFi

 3120

 81

 981

 1143

 2.65

 1.12 (0.90-1.39)

 6 Biologics-naïve RA

 43521

 2440

 1360

 1161

 4.12

 1.11 (1.06-1.16)

 7 General population

 387 480

 21735

 1160

 1037

 4.84

 REF


Disclosure: H. Wadström, None; J. Askling, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, UCB, Roche, Merck, BMS, Abbvie, 9.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Wadström H, Askling J. Risk of Cancer in Non-TNFi Biologics-Treated RA [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/risk-of-cancer-in-non-tnfi-biologics-treated-ra/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/risk-of-cancer-in-non-tnfi-biologics-treated-ra/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology